DigitalDoors Incorporated v. BNC National Bank
Infringement action filed 24 Oct 2025 in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona and closed 14 May 2026, with 4 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: voluntary dismissal.
Case record
- Patents involved
- US10250639B2US10182073B2US9734169B2US9015301B2
- Case no.
- 2:25-cv-03999
- Verdict cause
- Infringement action
- Court
- D. Ariz.
- Court level
- District Court
- Case region
- Arizona
- Chief judge
- Dominic W Lanza
- Trial level
- First instance
- Filed – Closed
- 24 Oct 2025 – 14 May 2026
- Duration
- 202 days
- Basis of termination
- Voluntary dismissal
- Products & marks
- Digital information infrastructure and method for security designated data and with granular data stores · Information infrastructure management data processing tools for processing data flow with distribution controls · Information infrastructure management tools with extractor, secure storage, content analysis and classification and method therefor · Information infrastructure management tools with variable and configurable filters and segmental data stores
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
Get an FTO claim chart- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
Information infrastructure management data processing tools for processing data flow with distribution controls
Method of processing and organizing (sometimes sanitizing) data throughput in an information infrastructure of a distributed computing system with configurable filters. Data stores are created with the data throughput. Filters operate on data to locate, extract, separate and store sensitive content (e.g., trade secrets) or select content (e.g., critical content) in designated, distributed data stores. Configurable filters expand sensitive/select data throughput, contract throughput, inferencing throughput, and hierarchical/orthogonal classifier filters reorganize the sensitive/select data, all to segment and store sensitive/select data in designated stores. Data output enables (a) sanitation; (b) data storage organization; (c) classification; (d) application of data processing (copying, distribution, archiving, etc.).
- Legal status
- Active
- Granted
- 2 Apr 2019
- Earliest priority
- 5 Jan 2007
- Est. expiry
- 9 Dec 2029
- Validity challenges
- None recorded
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- REDLICH, RON M. · NEMZOW, MARTIN A.
- Classification
- G06F15/173G06Q10/10H04L29/06G06F21/62H04L29/08
- Prosecution counsel
- The Concept Law Group, P.A.
- Examiner
- RAHMAN, S M A
Information infrastructure management tools with variable and configurable filters and segmental data stores
Method of creating an information infrastructure for processing data throughput or a method for processing data throughput in a distributed computing system works on sensitive content (e.g., trade secrets) or select content (e.g., critical content) and generates or reduces sensitive/select data with configurable filters (expanding, contracting, hierarchical/orthogonal classifier filters) to separate and store sensitive/select data in designated, distributed data stores. Sensitive/select data stores may have security clearance requirements.
- Legal status
- Active
- Granted
- 15 Jan 2019
- Earliest priority
- 5 Jan 2007
- Est. expiry
- 9 Dec 2029
- Validity challenges
- None recorded
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- REDLICH, RON M. · NEMZOW, MARTIN A.
- Classification
- G06F15/173G06Q10/10H04L29/08G06F21/62H04L29/06
- Prosecution counsel
- The Concept Law Group, P.A.
- Examiner
- RAHMAN, S M A
Also asserted in this case
2 moreThe docket lists 4 asserted patents. Full bibliographic detail, drawings and prosecution history for the remaining 2 asserted patents are one query away in Eureka.
Parties of record
DigitalDoors Incorporated
- Core tech
- G06F15/173G06Q10/10H04L29/06G06F21/62
- Counsel
- Matthew Lawrence Bycer · Michael Benjamin Marion
- Firm
- Bycer & Marion PLC – Phoenix, AZ
BNC National Bank
- Core tech
- Not recorded
- Counsel
- Grant D. Fairbairn · Stacey Faith Gottlieb
- Firm
- Fredrikson & Byron PA – Minneapolis, Papetti Samuels Weiss Mckirgan, LLP
Counsel of record
| Attorney | For | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Matthew Lawrence Bycer | DigitalDoors Incorporated | Plaintiff |
| Michael Benjamin Marion | DigitalDoors Incorporated | Plaintiff |
| Grant D. Fairbairn | BNC National Bank | Defendant |
| Stacey Faith Gottlieb | BNC National Bank | Defendant |
Basis of termination
From the record · verbatim“Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff DigitalDoors, Inc., by and through undersigned counsel, gives notice of voluntary dismissal of this action in its entirety, without prejudice.”
Case 2:25-cv-03999 · D. Ariz. · closed 14 May 2026
Related cases
Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.
Frequently asked questions
What is case 2:25-cv-03999?
2:25-cv-03999 is a patent infringement action brought by DigitalDoors Incorporated against BNC National Bank, filed on 24 Oct 2025 in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. The case closed on 14 May 2026.
Which patents were asserted in 2:25-cv-03999?
US10250639B2 (“Information infrastructure management data processing tools for processing data flow with distribution controls”), assigned to DIGITAL DOORS, INC., currently active; US10182073B2 (“Information infrastructure management tools with variable and configurable filters and segmental data stores”), assigned to DIGITAL DOORS, INC., currently active; US9734169B2 (“Digital information infrastructure and method for security designated data and with granular data stores”), assigned to DIGITAL DOORS, INC.; US9015301B2 (“Information infrastructure management tools with extractor, secure storage, content analysis and classification and method therefor”), assigned to DIGITAL DOORS, INC.. The record also lists Digital information infrastructure and method for security designated data and with granular data stores, Information infrastructure management data processing tools for processing data flow with distribution controls, Information infrastructure management tools with extractor, secure storage, content analysis and classification and method therefor and Information infrastructure management tools with variable and configurable filters and segmental data stores.
How was case 2:25-cv-03999 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is voluntary dismissal. The termination text reads: “Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff DigitalDoors, Inc., by and through undersigned counsel, gives notice of voluntary dismissal of this action in its entirety, without prejudice.”
What does dismissal without prejudice mean?
A dismissal without prejudice ends this action but leaves the claims alive — the plaintiff may file them again later, subject to the limitation period.
How long did case 2:25-cv-03999 take?
202 calendar days, from filing on 24 Oct 2025 to closure on 14 May 2026.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 2:25-cv-03999?
Chief Judge Dominic W Lanza presided. Matthew Lawrence Bycer and Michael Benjamin Marion are recorded as counsel for plaintiff DigitalDoors. Grant D. Fairbairn and Stacey Faith Gottlieb appear for defendant BNC National Bank.
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 2:25-cv-03999 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.