“This action having been commenced by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited (“Plaintiff”) against Defendants foshanshihaobangyeshangmao (Def. No. 64), zhaoliangfashangmao (Def. No. 83), and Zhiding co., ltd (Def. No. 84) (collectively, “Defendants”). Plaintiff and Defendants have resolved all claims arising from the allegations in the Complaint. THIS COURT HEREBY FINDS that it has personal jurisdiction over Defendants since Defendants directly target their business activities toward consumers in the United States, including Illinois. “In the context of cases like this one, that means a plaintiff must show that each defendant is actually operating an interactive website that is accessible in Illinois and that each defendant has aimed such site at Illinois by standing ready, willing and able to ship its [infringing] goods to customers in Illinois in particular (or otherwise has some sufficient voluntary contacts with the state).” Am. Bridal & Prom Indus. Ass’n v. P’ships & Unincorporated Ass’ns Identified on Schedule A, 192 F. Supp. 3d 924, 934 (N.D. Ill. 2016). Specifically, Defendants have targeted sales to Illinois residents by setting up and operating e-commerce stores that target United States consumers using one or more Seller Aliases, offered shipping to the United States, including Illinois, accepted payment in U.S. dollars and/or funds from U.S. bank accounts, and has sold products featuring Plaintiff’s patented design U.S. Case: 1:24-cv-08188 Document #: 54 Filed: 11/21/24 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:1187 2 Patent No. D853,642 to residents of Illinois (the “Infringing Product). Plaintiff’s U.S. Patent No. D853,642 (the “Dyson Design”) is shown in the below chart. Patent Number Claim Issue Date D853,642 July 9, 2019 Case: 1:24-cv-08188 Document #: 54 Filed: 11/21/24 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:1188 3 Patent Number Claim Issue Date THIS COURT FURTHER FINDS that Defendant is liable for patent infringement (35 U.S.C. § 271). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendants, their officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons acting for, with, by, through, under, or in active concert with it be permanently enjoined and restrained from: a. offering for sale, selling, and importing the Infringing Product; b. aiding, abetting, contributing to, or otherwise assisting anyone in offering for sale, selling, and importing the Infringing Product; and c. effecting assignments or transfers, forming new entities or associations or utilizing any other device for the purpose of circumventing or otherwise avoiding the prohibitions set forth in Subparagraphs (a) and (b). 2. Pursuant to the parties’ settlement agreement, Defendants shall pay Plaintiff in total $5,000 (five thousand dollars) in damages (the “Damages Amount”). Case: 1:24-cv-08188 Document #: 54 Filed: 11/21/24 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:1189 4 3. Walmart Inc. (“Walmart”) is ordered to transfer the Damages Amount from Defendants’ accounts to Plaintiff within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of this Order. 4. Upon Walmart’s transfer of Damages Amount to Plaintiff pursuant to paragraph 2, Walmart shall remove any restraints that were placed on Defendant’s e-commerce store and financial account pursuant to the Temporary Restraining Order [22]. 5. This case is dismissed with leave to reinstate within one hundred and eighty (180) days, at such time, absent a motion to reinstate, shall automatically convert to a dismissal with prejudice. 6. Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED.”