“This action having been commenced by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited (“Plaintiff” or “Dyson”) against the defendants identified on Schedule A, and using the Online Marketplace Accounts identified on Schedule A (collectively, the “Defendant Internet Stores”), and Plaintiff having moved for entry of Default and Default Judgment against the defendants identified on Schedule A attached hereto which have not yet been dismissed from this case (collectively, “Defaulting Defendants”); This Court having entered a preliminary injunction against certain defendants; Plaintiff having properly completed service of process on Defaulting Defendants, the combination of providing notice via electronic publication and e-mail, along with any notice that Defaulting Defendants received from payment processors, being notice reasonably calculated under all circumstances to apprise Defaulting Defendants of the pendency of the action and affording them the opportunity to answer and present their objections; and None of the Defaulting Defendants having answered or appeared in any way, and the time for answering having expired, so that the allegations of the Complaint are uncontroverted and are deemed admitted; Case: 1:25-cv-12610 Document #: 58 Filed: 12/17/25 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:986 2 This Court finds that it has personal jurisdiction over Defaulting Defendants because Defaulting Defendants directly target their business activities toward consumers in the United States, including Illinois. Specifically, Plaintiff has provided a basis to conclude that Defaulting Defendants have targeted sales to Illinois residents by setting up and operating e-commerce stores that target United States consumers using one or more seller aliases, offer shipping to the United States, including Illinois, accept payment in U.S. dollars and/or funds from U.S. bank accounts, and have sold the same product shown in Exhibit 1 to the Complaint [3], that infringes Plaintiff’s U.S. Patent No. D853,642 and U.S. Patent No. D852,415, namely hair styling products that copy the ornamental designs shown in the below chart, to residents of Illinois. In this case, Plaintiff has presented screenshot evidence that each Defendant ecommerce store is reaching out to do business with Illinois residents by operating one or more commercial, interactive internet stores through which Illinois residents can and do purchase the Infringing Products. See Docket No. [19], which includes screenshot evidence confirming that each Defendant e-commerce store does stand ready, willing and able to ship the Infringing Products to customers in Illinois. Plaintiff’s U.S. Patent No. D853,642 and U.S. Patent No. D852,415 (the “Dyson Designs”) are shown in the below chart. Patent Number Claim Issue Date D853,642 July 9, 2019 Case: 1:25-cv-12610 Document #: 58 Filed: 12/17/25 Page 2 of 11 PageID #:987 3 Patent Number Claim Issue Date Case: 1:25-cv-12610 Document #: 58 Filed: 12/17/25 Page 3 of 11 PageID #:988 4 Patent Number Claim Issue Date D852,415 June 25, 2019 Case: 1:25-cv-12610 Document #: 58 Filed: 12/17/25 Page 4 of 11 PageID #:989 5 Patent Number Claim Issue Date This Court further finds that Defaulting Defendants are liable for design patent infringement (35 U.S.C. § 271). Case: 1:25-cv-12610 Document #: 58 Filed: 12/17/25 Page 5 of 11 PageID #:990 6 Accordingly, this Court orders that Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default and Default Judgment is GRANTED as follows, that Defaulting Defendants are deemed in default, and that this Default Judgment is entered against Defaulting Defendants. This Court further orders that: 1. Defaulting Defendants, their officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons acting for, with, by, through, under, or in active concert with them be permanently enjoined and restrained from: a. offering for sale, selling, and importing Infringing Product; b. aiding, abetting, contributing to, or otherwise assisting anyone in offering for sale, selling, and importing the Infringing Product; and c. effecting assignments or transfers, forming new entities or associations or utilizing any other device for the purpose of circumventing or otherwise avoiding the prohibitions set forth in Subparagraphs (a) and (b). 2. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 289, Plaintiff is awarded profits from each of the Defaulting Defendants for the sale of the Infringing Product sold through at least the Defaulting Defendants’ Seller Aliases according to the below chart: No. Defendant/Seller Alias Award 1 bofangim $250.00 2 gai199 $250.00 3 JingErKangJiaZheng $250.00 9 TFXR-AUTO Store $250.00 11 All we have is now $250.00 12 Find your fire $250.00 13 FYun-Enterprise $250.00 14 GaoHeNine $250.00 15 HB-501 $250.00 17 Jin Yue III $250.00 18 Jin Yue Li $250.00 19 Jin Yue zhou $250.00 Case: 1:25-cv-12610 Document #: 58 Filed: 12/17/25 Page 6 of 11 PageID #:991 7 20 Light chaser $250.00 21 LuoS-Enterprise $250.00 22 MSY-Enterprise $250.00 25 Phoenix plus local $250.00 26 QI XIN II Ltd $250.00 27 QI XIN IV Ltd $250.00 30 Shine like the stars $282.79 31 shuoshangfuzhuangyouxiangongsi $250.00 32 Take the road less $250.00 33 Tang Shuang $250.00 34 VTOCC $250.00 35 YONGDE seven Ltd $250.00 36 YONGDE six Ltd $250.00 37 YY&MIS $250.00 38 Zhang Weijun $250.00 3. Defaulting Defendants and any third party with actual notice of this Order who is providing services for any of the Defaulting Defendants, or in connection with any of the Defaulting Defendants’ Online Marketplaces, including, without limitation, any online marketplace platforms such as PayPal, Inc. (“PayPal”), eBay, Inc. (“eBay”), Amazon.com, Inc. (“Amazon”) and Walmart, Inc. (“Walmart”) (collectively, the “Third Party Providers”), shall within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of this Order cease: a. using, linking to, transferring, selling, exercising control over, or otherwise owning the Online Marketplace Accounts, or any other online marketplace account that is being used to sell or is the means by which Defaulting Defendants could continue to sell Infringing Products; and b. operating and/or hosting websites that are involved with the distribution, marketing, advertising, offering for sale, or sale of the Infringing Products. 4. Upon Plaintiff’s request, those with notice of this Order, including the Third Party Providers as defined in Paragraph 3, shall within seven (7) calendar days after receipt of Case: 1:25-cv-12610 Document #: 58 Filed: 12/17/25 Page 7 of 11 PageID #:992 8 such notice, disable and cease displaying any advertisements used by or associated with Defaulting Defendants in connection with the sale of Infringing Products. 5. Any Third Party Providers holding funds for Defaulting Defendants, including PayPal, Amazon and Walmart, shall, within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of this Order, permanently restrain and enjoin any accounts connected to Defaulting Defendants or the Defendant Internet Stores from transferring or disposing of any funds (up to the damages awarded in Paragraph 2 above) or other of Defaulting Defendants’ assets. 6. All monies (up to the amount of the damages awarded in Paragraph 2 above) currently restrained in Defaulting Defendants’ financial accounts, including monies held by Third Party Providers such as PayPal, Amazon and Walmart, are hereby released to Plaintiff as partial payment of the above-identified damages, and Third Party Providers are ordered to release to Plaintiff the amounts from Defaulting Defendants’ financial accounts within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of this Order. 7. Until Plaintiff has recovered full payment of monies owed to it by any Defaulting Defendant, Plaintiff shall have the ongoing authority to commence supplemental proceedings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69. 8. In the event that Plaintiff identifies any additional online marketplace accounts or financial accounts owned by Defaulting Defendants, Plaintiff may send notice of any supplemental proceeding, including a citation to discover assets, to Defaulting Defendants by e-mail at the e-mail addresses identified in Exhibits to the Declaration of Giles Samuel Lane and any e-mail addresses provided for Defaulting Defendants by third parties. 9. The seventeen thousand dollar ($17,000) ($1,000 per Defendant subject to the TRO) surety bond posted by Plaintiff is hereby released to Plaintiff or its counsel, Greer, Burns & Crain, Case: 1:25-cv-12610 Document #: 58 Filed: 12/17/25 Page 8 of 11 PageID #:993 9 Ltd. The Clerk of the Court is directed to return the surety bond previously deposited with the Clerk of the Court to Plaintiff or its counsel. This is a Default Judgment.”