Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
EcoFactor v. Google et al. | Patent Lawsuit 22-1971

EcoFactor, Inc v. Google, LLC et al.

22-1971 Fed. Cir. Closed US10534382B2
Get a prior-art report

Patentability filed 30 Jun 2022 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and closed 30 Nov 2023, with US10534382B2 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: voluntary dismissal.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Patent involved
US10534382B2
Application no.
US16/374085
Case no.
22-1971
Verdict cause
Patentability
Court
Fed. Cir.
Court level
Court of Appeals
Case region
District of Columbia
Chief judge
None recorded
Trial level
Appeal
Filed – Closed
30 Jun 2022 – 30 Nov 2023
Duration
518 days
Basis of termination
Voluntary dismissal
Products & marks
System and method for using a wireless device as a sensor for an energy management system
Validity challenges
4 on record
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 22-1971, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US10534382B2 Inactive App. US16/374085

System and method for using a wireless device as a sensor for an energy management system

The invention comprises systems and methods for detecting the use of networked consumer electronics devices as indications of occupancy of a structure for purposes of automatically adjusting the temperature setpoint on a thermostatic HVAC control. At least one thermostat is located inside a structure and is used to control an HVAC system in the structure. At least one networked electronic device is used to indicate the state of occupancy of the structure. The state of occupancy is used to alter the setpoint on the thermostatic HVAC control to reduce unneeded conditioning of unoccupied spaces.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Inactive
Granted
14 Jan 2020
Earliest priority
14 Jul 2008
Est. expiry
13 Jul 2029
Validity challenges
4 on recordIPR2021-01052 · filed by ecobee Inc.90014679 · EPR · filed by DAVID P. EMERYIPR2021-00054 · Other · filed by Google LLCIPR2021-00054 · Patentability · filed by ECOFACTOR, INC
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
G05D23/00G08B1/08G05D23/19G05B15/02F24F11/70G06N7/00F24F11/30F24F11/62F24F11/46F24F11/56F24F11/63F24F120/10F24F120/12F24F120/14F24F120/20F24F140/60
Prosecution counsel
Tanner IP, PLLC
Examiner
OJHA, AJAY
US10534382B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US10534382B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2
Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Counsel of record

Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“On November 28, 2023, Ecofactor, Inc, Google LLC, and Ecobee Technologies ULC stipulated to voluntary dis-missal of Appeal Nos. 2022-1971, 2022-1974.”

Case 22-1971 · Fed. Cir. · closed 30 November 2023
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 22-1971?

22-1971 is a patent patentability brought by EcoFactor, Inc against Google, LLC, filed on 30 Jun 2022 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The case closed on 30 November 2023.

Which patent was asserted in 22-1971?

US10534382B2 (“System and method for using a wireless device as a sensor for an energy management system”), assigned to ECOFACTOR, INC., currently inactive. The record also lists System and method for using a wireless device as a sensor for an energy management system.

How was case 22-1971 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is voluntary dismissal. The termination text reads: “On November 28, 2023, Ecofactor, Inc, Google LLC, and Ecobee Technologies ULC stipulated to voluntary dis-missal of Appeal Nos. 2022-1971, 2022-1974.”

What does voluntary dismissal mean?

A voluntary dismissal is one the plaintiff asks for rather than one the court imposes. Where both sides stipulate to it, it commonly signals a settlement that is not filed on the public docket.

How long did case 22-1971 take?

518 calendar days, from filing on 30 Jun 2022 to closure on 30 November 2023.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 22-1971?

Brian David Ledahl, Jonathan Link and Reza Mirzaie are recorded as counsel for plaintiff EcoFactor. Andrew Baluch, Elizabeth Laughton and Matthew A. Smith appear for defendant Google.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 22-1971 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 22-1971 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.