Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
Edelta v. Great Innovations: iFLO A/C Drain Cleaning Patent Dispute | PatSnap
Explore in Eureka
Case ID0:24-cv-61564
FiledAug 2024
ClosedSep 2024
Patent Litigation

Edelta v. Great Innovations: iFLO A/C Drain Patent Case Dismissed Without Prejudice

Edelta, Inc. and inventor John S. Gutierrez sued Great Innovations, LLC over US9943778B1, a patent covering the iFLO Smart Automated A/C Drain Line & Drain Pan Cleaning System. Filed in the Florida Southern District Court, the infringement action lasted just 19 days before plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed without prejudice, leaving the door open for re-filing.

Resolution time
19days
19 days — resolved before any substantive court response, well below the district median
Patents asserted
1
US9943778B1 — iFLO Smart Automated A/C Drain Line & Drain Pan Cleaning System
Outcome
Dismissed without Prejudice
Voluntary dismissal without prejudice; plaintiff retains right to re-file the same claims
Cost ruling
Costs: N/A
No cost or fee order recorded; case closed before defendant response was filed
Published by PatSnap Insights Team · Verified by PatSnap Eureka Data
Case overview

A swift voluntary exit: Edelta’s 19-day A/C drain patent action

On 25 August 2024, Edelta, Inc. and individual plaintiff John S. Gutierrez filed a patent infringement action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case No. 0:24-cv-61564) against Great Innovations, LLC and Joseph McDonnell. The asserted patent, US9943778B1, covers the iFLO Smart Automated A/C Drain Line & Drain Pan Cleaning System — a product in the HVAC maintenance technology space. The case was assigned to Judge Raag Singhal and represented on the plaintiff side by attorney Louis R. Gigliotti.

Just 19 days after filing, on 13 September 2024, the plaintiffs filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal without Prejudice (DE [8]). Judge Singhal reviewed the notice and entered an order dismissing the matter without prejudice, directing the Clerk to close the case and denying all pending motions as moot. A dismissal without prejudice means no final judgment was entered on the merits, and the plaintiffs retain the legal right to re-file the same infringement claims against the same defendants in the future.

The 19-day lifespan of this action — ending before any defendant appearance or substantive briefing on the record — suggests the dismissal was likely driven by a pre-litigation settlement, licensing negotiation, or a strategic reassessment of the case. The public record is silent on the specific motivation. Because the dismissal is without prejudice, any resolution between the parties cannot be confirmed from court documents alone, and the underlying patent remains enforceable.

Case at a glance
Case no.0:24-cv-61564
PlaintiffEdelta, Inc.
CourtFlorida Southern
JudgeRaag Singhal
FiledAugust 25, 2024
ClosedSeptember 13, 2024
Duration19 days
OutcomeDismissed without Prejudice
Verdict causeInfringement Action
BasisDismissed without Prejudice
Prior Art Intelligence
See what prior art exists on this patent.
Eureka scans millions of patents and papers to surface prior art that may have invalidated these claims before costly litigation begins.
Check Prior Art
Case data sourced from PACER / Florida Southern District Court via PatSnap Eureka Litigation Intelligence Explore similar cases ↗
Case timeline

Filing to Dismissed without Prejudice in 19 days

19 days — resolved before any substantive court response, well below the district median

Case timeline: Complaint filed AUG 25 2024, SEP–OCT — 19 days total Horizontal timeline showing the three key events in Edelta, Inc. v Great Innovations, LLC from filing to resolution. Source: PACER, Florida Southern District Court. AUG 25 2024 Complaint filed Pre-trial proceedings SEP 13 2024 Dismissed without Prejudice 19 DAYS TOTAL
Dismissal terms

Voluntarily dismissed without prejudice: what the order means for both parties

Legal mechanism

Voluntary dismissal without prejudice under Rule 41

A voluntary dismissal without prejudice, governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), is a plaintiff-initiated exit before the defendant has served an answer or summary judgment motion. It carries no merit-based adjudication — the court makes no finding on infringement, validity, or damages. Critically, it is ‘without prejudice’, meaning the same claims can be re-filed in the future, subject to the statute of limitations.

No merits ruling entered
Dismissal distinction

Without prejudice vs. with prejudice — the public record is silent on why

A dismissal with prejudice would permanently bar the plaintiff from re-filing on the same patent claims. A dismissal without prejudice preserves that right. This order is explicitly without prejudice. However, the public record does not disclose whether an out-of-court agreement — such as a license or settlement — was reached. Practitioners should not assume a resolution was achieved; the case may simply have been withdrawn for strategic or procedural reasons.

Re-filing right preserved
Plaintiff outcome

Edelta retains enforcement rights — case can be re-filed

Because no prejudice attaches, Edelta and Gutierrez are not barred from reasserting US9943778B1 against Great Innovations or other parties. If the dismissal reflects an unresolved dispute rather than a settlement, defendants remain exposed to future litigation. Patent holders in HVAC technology segments have increasingly used sequential filings as a monitoring and enforcement tactic.

Future enforcement possible
Defendant outcome

Great Innovations avoids judgment — but uncertainty persists

Great Innovations and McDonnell achieved dismissal without any court finding against them, and incurred no cost order. However, a without-prejudice dismissal provides no immunity. If no license was granted, the defendants face continued exposure under US9943778B1. Companies in the A/C drain maintenance and HVAC accessories space should monitor the patent’s status and any re-filing activity by Edelta.

No immunity from re-filing
Legal analysis based on PACER docket records for case 0:24-cv-61564 and PatSnap Eureka litigation intelligence Search PatSnap Eureka ↗
Parties and representation

Full party and counsel information

RoleNameTypeDetail
PlaintiffEdelta, Inc.CompanyHVAC technology company — holder of US9943778B1 (iFLO A/C Drain Cleaning System)Search in Eureka ↗
Co-PlaintiffJOHN S. GUTIERREZIndividualSearch in Eureka ↗
DefendantGreat Innovations, LLCCompanyGreat Innovations, LLC and Joseph McDonnell — accused of infringing the iFLO drain cleaning patentSearch in Eureka ↗
Co-DefendantJOSEPH MCDONNELLIndividualSearch in Eureka ↗
Plaintiff counselLouis R. Gigliotti.AttorneyCounsel for Edelta, Inc.Search in Eureka ↗
Presiding judgeJudge Raag SinghalJudgeFlorida Southern District CourtSearch in Eureka ↗
Official verdict

Official order — verbatim text

“THIS CAUSE came before the Court on the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal without Prejudice filed by Plaintiff (DE [8]). The Court having reviewed the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal and the docket, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case and any pending motions are DENIED as moot. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 13th day of September 2024.”
Source: PACER Docket, Case 0:24-cv-61564, Florida Southern District Court

The court’s order tracks the plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal directly, entering dismissal without prejudice and mooting all pending motions. The phrasing ‘DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE’ confirms no merits determination was made — neither infringement nor invalidity was adjudicated. For practitioners, this means US9943778B1 exits the litigation record unscathed, and Great Innovations carries no res judicata protection against future assertions of the same patent.

PACER case 0:24-cv-61564 · Public docket record Explore in Eureka ↗
Patent at issue

US9943778B1 — iFLO Smart Automated A/C Drain Line & Drain Pan Cleaning System

Publication No.US9943778B1
Application No.US14/560469
Patent details
ProductSmart automated A/C drain line and drain pan cleaning system for HVAC maintenance
Cited in actionAugust 25, 2024

US9943778B1 (application number US14/560469) covers the iFLO Smart Automated A/C Drain Line & Drain Pan Cleaning System — a technology in the HVAC preventive maintenance space designed to automate the clearing of condensate drain lines and pans in air conditioning units. Such systems address a common failure point in residential and commercial HVAC installations where blockages cause water damage and system inefficiency. The patent’s B1 designation indicates it issued without post-issuance amendment, suggesting its claims emerged from prosecution in their original form.

In the HVAC accessories and smart home maintenance market, automated drain cleaning systems represent a niche but commercially relevant segment. A granted patent in this space can create meaningful barriers for competitors offering similar automated or IoT-connected drain maintenance products. The assertion of this patent against Great Innovations — a company whose name suggests a product innovation focus — is consistent with enforcement against a direct competitive offering. Companies developing connected HVAC maintenance devices should assess claim scope carefully before product launch.

Patent data sourced from USPTO via PatSnap Eureka patent database Search patent records in Eureka ↗
Freedom to operate

Should you run an FTO analysis against US9943778B1?

Any company designing, manufacturing, importing, or selling automated A/C drain line cleaning systems, drain pan maintenance devices, or connected HVAC preventive maintenance products in the U.S. market should consider a freedom-to-operate review against US9943778B1. The patent has been actively asserted, and the without-prejudice dismissal confirms it remains enforceable. The risk is particularly relevant for products targeting residential or commercial HVAC installation aftermarkets.

PatSnap Eureka’s FTO Search Agent can map the claim landscape of US9943778B1 against your product specifications, flag design-around opportunities, and identify any continuation or related applications that may extend the patent family’s coverage. Given the active enforcement posture of the patent holder, proactive FTO analysis is a lower-cost alternative to litigation defence — especially for companies entering the smart HVAC accessories segment.

PatSnap Eureka FTO Search

Run a freedom-to-operate analysis on US9943778B1 to assess your product’s exposure

Run FTO in Eureka →
Related litigation

Similar HVAC patent infringement cases in Florida federal courts

Explore related patent infringement actions involving HVAC maintenance and smart home device patents filed in Florida federal district courts.

🔍
Access 40+ similar cases in PatSnap Eureka
Edelta, Inc. patent enforcement history, Florida Southern case history, Edelta, Inc.’s full IP portfolio, and comparable case analysis
HVAC patent actions FLDrain system IP disputesSmart home device patentsFL Southern IP filings
Unlock similar cases in Eureka →
Strategic implications

What this case signals for the HVAC accessories IP landscape

A 19-day patent action in the A/C drain cleaning space raises questions about enforcement strategy, licensing intent, and sector-wide patent risk.

Short-duration dismissals often precede licensing deals or re-filings

When plaintiffs voluntarily dismiss within weeks of filing — before any defendant answer — it typically signals either a rapid out-of-court resolution or a strategic pause. Neither outcome is confirmed here. Companies in the HVAC maintenance product space should track Edelta’s subsequent filings to assess whether a broader enforcement campaign is underway.

US9943778B1 remains active and enforceable post-dismissal

The without-prejudice dismissal has no effect on the validity or enforceability of US9943778B1. Any competitor manufacturing, selling, or distributing automated A/C drain line or drain pan cleaning systems should conduct a freedom-to-operate review against this patent before market entry or product launch.

🔒
Full strategic analysis in PatSnap Eureka
Unlock gated analysis on HVAC patent enforcement strategy and Florida Southern District Court filing patterns.
Inventor co-plaintiff riskRe-filing probability signalsFL Southern District trends
Unlock full analysis →
Analysis powered by PatSnap Eureka Litigation Intelligence Explore in Eureka ↗
Frequently asked questions

Edelta v Great — key questions answered

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka can answer them instantly from patent and litigation data. Ask Eureka ↗
PatSnap Eureka

Stay ahead of HVAC patent enforcement actions

Track re-filing risk on US9943778B1 and map the broader A/C drain cleaning patent landscape with PatSnap Eureka. Run an FTO analysis before launching competing HVAC maintenance products in the US market.

Ask anything about this case.
PatSnap Eureka searches patents and litigation data to answer instantly.
Powered by PatSnap Eureka
Link copied to clipboard

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.