Err Content IP, LLC v. FuboTV, Inc.
Infringement action filed 18 Mar 2026 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and closed 10 Apr 2026, with US10721542B2 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: voluntary dismissal.
Case record
- Patent involved
- US10721542B2
- Application no.
- US14/396843
- Case no.
- 1:26-cv-02230
- Verdict cause
- Infringement action
- Court
- S.D.N.Y.
- Court level
- District Court
- Case region
- New York
- Chief judge
- Jennifer H. Rearden
- Trial level
- First instance
- Filed – Closed
- 18 Mar 2026 – 10 Apr 2026
- Duration
- 23 days
- Basis of termination
- Voluntary dismissal
- Products & marks
- FuboTV app system and related systems (e.g. https:// https://support.fubo.tv/hc/en-ca/articles/115003444191-How-do-I-cast-Fubo-using-Chromecast/)
- Validity challenges
- 1 on record
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
Get an FTO claim chart- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
Method and device for providing a main content and an extra content to a user through reference item
A method for providing a main content and an extra content to a user by accessing said extra content through a reference item. The method includes receiving said main content from a first source and displaying said main content by said first device. Also, based on said reference item, said extra content is retrieved and/or received from a second source and simultaneously displayed together with said main content on said first device. Or said reference item may be forwarded to a second device, and thereby said extra content is retrieved and/or received from a second source by said second device and, simultaneously, the main content is displayed on said first device and the extra content is displayed on said second device.
- Legal status
- Active
- Granted
- 21 Jul 2020
- Est. expiry
- 26 Apr 2032
- Validity challenges
- 1 on record90019787 · EPR
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- EZEQUIEL, RUIZ RODRIGUEZ
- Classification
- H04N21/81H04N21/431H04N21/462H04N21/858H04N21/436H04N21/4725H04N5/445H04N21/41H04N21/422H04N5/44
- Prosecution counsel
- Workman Nydegger
- Examiner
- ALATA, YASSIN
Parties of record
Err Content IP, LLC
- Core tech
- H04N21/81H04N21/431H04N21/462H04N21/858
- Counsel
- David John Hoffman
- Firm
- Law Office David J. Hoffman
FuboTV, Inc.
- Core tech
- Not recorded
- Counsel
- Not recorded
- Firm
- Not recorded
Counsel of record
| Attorney | For | Role |
|---|---|---|
| David John Hoffman | Err Content IP, LLC | Plaintiff |
Basis of termination
From the record · verbatim“Pursuant to Federal Rule 41 (a)(1)(A)(i), the Plaintiff, Err Content IP, LLC hereby files this notice of voluntary dismissal of this action for all of Plaintiff’s claims as Defendant has not answered the complaint or filed a motion for summary judgement. The Plaintiff agrees that the dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims shall be WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”
Case 1:26-cv-02230 · S.D.N.Y. · closed 10 April 2026
Related cases
Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.
Frequently asked questions
What is case 1:26-cv-02230?
1:26-cv-02230 is a patent infringement action brought by Err Content IP, LLC against FuboTV, Inc., filed on 18 Mar 2026 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The case closed on 10 April 2026.
Which patent was asserted in 1:26-cv-02230?
US10721542B2 (“Method and device for providing a main content and an extra content to a user through reference item”), assigned to ERR CONTENT IP, LLC, currently active. The record also lists FuboTV app system and related systems (e.g. https:// https://support.fubo.tv/hc/en-ca/articles/115003444191-How-do-I-cast-Fubo-using-Chromecast/).
How was case 1:26-cv-02230 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is voluntary dismissal. The termination text reads: “Pursuant to Federal Rule 41 (a)(1)(A)(i), the Plaintiff, Err Content IP, LLC hereby files this notice of voluntary dismissal of this action for all of Plaintiff’s claims as Defendant has not answered the complaint or filed a motion for summary judgement. The Plaintiff agrees that the dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims shall be WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”
What does dismissal without prejudice mean?
A dismissal without prejudice ends this action but leaves the claims alive — the plaintiff may file them again later, subject to the limitation period.
How long did case 1:26-cv-02230 take?
23 calendar days, from filing on 18 Mar 2026 to closure on 10 April 2026.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 1:26-cv-02230?
Chief Judge Jennifer H. Rearden presided. David John Hoffman is recorded as counsel for plaintiff Err Content IP.
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 1:26-cv-02230 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.