Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
Eset et al. v. Finjan | Patent Lawsuit 22-930

Eset, LLC et al. v. Finjan, LLC

22-930 U.S. Supreme Court Closed 5 patents
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 22 Mar 2023 in the U.S. Supreme Court and closed 24 Apr 2023, with 5 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: petition dismissed.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Case no.
22-930
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
U.S. Supreme Court
Court level
Supreme Court
Case region
District of Columbia
Chief judge
None recorded
Trial level
Judicial review
Filed – Closed
22 Mar 2023 – 24 Apr 2023
Duration
33 days
Basis of termination
Petition Dismissed
Products & marks
Malicious mobile code runtime monitoring system and methods · System and method for attaching a downloadable security profile to a downloadable · System and method for protecting a computer and a network from hostile downloadables
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 22-930, U.S. Supreme Court. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US6804780B1 Inactive App. US09/539667

System and method for protecting a computer and a network from hostile downloadables

A computer-based method for generating a Downloadable ID to identify a Downloadable, including obtaining a Downloadable that includes one or more references to software components required by the Downloadable, fetching at least one software component identified by the one or more references, and performing a function on the Downloadable and the fetched software components to generate a Downloadable ID. A system and a computer-readable storage medium are also described and claimed.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Inactive
Granted
12 Oct 2004
Est. expiry
6 Nov 2017
Validity challenges
2 on recordIPR2016-00492 · filed by Blue Coat Systems, Inc.IPR2016-00165 · filed by Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
G06F1/00G06F21/00G06F13/00G06F21/51G06F21/53H04L29/06
Prosecution counsel
Bey & Cotropia PLLC
Examiner
SHEIKH, AYAZ
US9219755B2 Inactive App. US14/732188

Malicious mobile code runtime monitoring system and methods

Protection systems and methods provide for protecting one or more personal computers (“PCs”) and/or other intermittently or persistently network accessible devices or processes from undesirable or otherwise malicious operations of Java TN applets, ActiveX™ controls, JavaScript™ scripts, Visual Basic scripts, add-ins, downloaded/uploaded programs or other “Downloadables” or “mobile code” in whole or part. A protection engine embodiment provides for monitoring information received, determining whether received information does or is likely to include executable code, and if so, causes mobile protection code (MPC) to be transferred to and rendered operable within a destination device of the received information. An MPC embodiment further provides, within a Downloadable-destination, for initiating the Downloadable, enabling malicious Downloadable operation attempts to be received by the MPC, and causing (predetermined) corresponding operations to be executed in response to the attempts.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Inactive
Granted
22 Dec 2015
Earliest priority
8 Nov 1996
Est. expiry
29 Jan 2017
Validity challenges
1 on recordIPR2017-00997 · Other · filed by BLUE COAT SYSTEMS LLC
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
H04L29/06G06F21/53G06F21/56G06F21/51
Prosecution counsel
Bey & Cotropia PLLC
Examiner
NALVEN, ANDREW
US9219755B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US9219755B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2

Also asserted in this case

3 more

The docket lists 5 asserted patents. Full bibliographic detail, drawings and prosecution history for the remaining 3 asserted patents are one query away in Eureka.

Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Counsel of record

AttorneyForRole
Nicola A. PisanoEset, LLCPlaintiff
Juanita R. BrooksFinjan, LLCDefendant
Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“Petition DENIED”

Case 22-930 · U.S. Supreme Court · closed 24 April 2023
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 22-930?

22-930 is a patent infringement action brought by Eset, LLC against Finjan, LLC, filed on 22 Mar 2023 in the U.S. Supreme Court. The case closed on 24 April 2023.

Which patents were asserted in 22-930?

US6804780B1 (“System and method for protecting a computer and a network from hostile downloadables”), assigned to FINJAN LLC, currently inactive; US9219755B2 (“Malicious mobile code runtime monitoring system and methods”), assigned to FINJAN LLC, currently inactive; US6154844A (“System and method for attaching a downloadable security profile to a downloadable”), assigned to FINJAN LLC; US8079086B1 (“Malicious mobile code runtime monitoring system and methods”), assigned to FINJAN LLC; US9189621B2 (“Malicious mobile code runtime monitoring system and methods”), assigned to FINJAN LLC. The record also lists Malicious mobile code runtime monitoring system and methods, System and method for attaching a downloadable security profile to a downloadable and System and method for protecting a computer and a network from hostile downloadables.

How was case 22-930 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is petition dismissed. The termination text reads: “Petition DENIED”

How long did case 22-930 take?

33 calendar days, from filing on 22 Mar 2023 to closure on 24 April 2023.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 22-930?

Nicola A. Pisano is recorded as counsel for plaintiff Eset. Juanita R. Brooks appears for defendant Finjan.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 22-930 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 22-930 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.