Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
Flexiworld Technologies v. Hisense et al. | Patent Lawsuit 1:22-cv-04338

Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Hisense Company, Ltd. et al.

1:22-cv-04338 N.D. Ga. Closed US7609402B2
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 31 Oct 2022 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia and closed 7 Apr 2023, with US7609402B2 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: case settled.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Patent involved
US7609402B2
Application no.
US10/053651
Case no.
1:22-cv-04338
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
N.D. Ga.
Court level
District Court
Case region
Georgia
Chief judge
Steven D. Grimberg
Trial level
First instance
Filed – Closed
31 Oct 2022 – 7 Apr 2023
Duration
158 days
Basis of termination
Case Settled
Products & marks
Methods for universal data output
Validity challenges
1 on record
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 1:22-cv-04338, United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US7609402B2 Inactive App. US10/053651

Methods for universal data output

A data output method for rendering at an output device content accessible with an information apparatus, includes obtaining at the information apparatus one or more rasterization parameters corresponding to the output device and conforming at the information apparatus at least part of the data content into one or more output images with said one or more rasterization parameters. An intermediate output data is transmitted from the information apparatus to an output controller that is distinct from the information apparatus and associated with the selected output device, the intermediate output data including one or more output image. The intermediate output data is converted at the output controller into an output data acceptable for rendering at the output device.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Inactive
Granted
27 Oct 2009
Earliest priority
19 Jan 2001
Est. expiry
19 Dec 2025
Validity challenges
1 on recordIPR2023-00845 · Patentability · filed by LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
G06F3/12G06K15/00G06K15/02G06Q20/10H04L29/08H04W4/80
Prosecution counsel
CHERNOFF, VILHAUER LLP
Examiner
POPOVICI, DOV
US7609402B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US7609402B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2
Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Defendant

Hisense Company, Ltd.

Core tech
Not recorded
Counsel
Matthew C. Bernstein
Firm
Perkins Coie LLP
Also named
Guiyang Industrial And Commercial Assets Management Co., Ltd. · Qingdao Hisense Electronics Industry Holdings Co., Ltd. · Hisense USA Corporation · Hisense International Co., Ltd · Guiyang Hisense Electronics Co., Ltd. · Hisense Electronics Manufacturing Company of America Corporation · Hisense International (HK) Co., Ltd. · Hisense Visual Technology Co., Ltd. · Qingdao Huatong State-Owned Capital Operation (Group) Co., Ltd. · Hisense International America Holdings Co., Ltd.

Counsel of record

Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“The Court has been informed that the parties have reached a settlement and will present dismissal documents once the paperwork has been finalized. Therefore, the Clerk is DIRECTED to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case. This closure is not a dismissal and does not preclude the filing of documents. The case may be re-opened if necessary. The parties are ORDERED to file documents to dispose of the case within 60 days of the date of this Order. Absent an extension of that deadline or further order of the Court, if no request to reopen the case is made within 60 days, the case will be considered DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE at that time”

Case 1:22-cv-04338 · N.D. Ga. · closed 7 April 2023
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 1:22-cv-04338?

1:22-cv-04338 is a patent infringement action brought by Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. against Hisense Company, Ltd., filed on 31 Oct 2022 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The case closed on 7 April 2023.

Which patent was asserted in 1:22-cv-04338?

US7609402B2 (“Methods for universal data output”), assigned to FLEXIWORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC., currently inactive. The record also lists Methods for universal data output.

How was case 1:22-cv-04338 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is case settled. The termination text reads: “The Court has been informed that the parties have reached a settlement and will present dismissal documents once the paperwork has been finalized. Therefore, the Clerk is DIRECTED to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case. This closure is not a dismissal and does not preclude the filing of documents. The case may be re-opened if necessary. The parties are ORDERED to file documents to dispose of the case within 60 days of the date of this Order. Absent an extension of that deadline or further order of the Court, if no request to reopen the case is made within 60 days, the case will be considered DIS

What does dismissal with prejudice mean?

A dismissal with prejudice permanently ends the claims that were filed, so the same claims cannot be brought again against that defendant. It is the usual form when the parties have settled.

How long did case 1:22-cv-04338 take?

158 calendar days, from filing on 31 Oct 2022 to closure on 7 April 2023.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 1:22-cv-04338?

Chief Judge Steven D. Grimberg presided. Charles Austin Ginnings, John Nixon Mahaffey, Steven G. Hill and Timothy E. Grochocinski are recorded as counsel for plaintiff Flexiworld Technologies. Matthew C. Bernstein appears for defendant Hisense.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 1:22-cv-04338 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 1:22-cv-04338 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.