Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
Floriey Industries International v. Life Pro Fitness et al. | Patent Lawsuit 1:22-cv-05791

Floriey Industries International Co., Ltd. v. Life Pro Fitness, LLC et al.

1:22-cv-05791 E.D.N.Y. Closed US6656093B2
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 28 Sep 2022 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York and closed 18 Sep 2023, with US6656093B2 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: voluntary dismissal.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Patent involved
US6656093B2
Application no.
US09/867509
Case no.
1:22-cv-05791
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
E.D.N.Y.
Court level
District Court
Case region
New York
Chief judge
None recorded
Trial level
First instance
Filed – Closed
28 Sep 2022 – 18 Sep 2023
Duration
355 days
Basis of termination
Voluntary dismissal
Products & marks
Dumbbells
Validity challenges
None recorded
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 1:22-cv-05791, United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US6656093B2 Inactive App. US09/867509

Adjustable dumbbell having easily adjusting structure

An adjustable dumbbell includes one or more weights engaged onto a rod, and a latch slidably engaged in the rod and movable to engage with one or more of the weights for selectively or adjustably securing the weights to the rod. The weights each has a groove for receiving the rod, and each has a channel communicating with the groove for receiving the latch. A fastener is secured to the latch and slidably engaged in the rod for moving the latch relative to the rod. A barrel is slidably engaged on the fastener and a spring may bias the barrel to engage with the rod.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Inactive
Granted
2 Dec 2003
Est. expiry
27 Apr 2022
Validity challenges
None recorded
Licences recorded
None recorded
Inventors
CHEN, PAUL
Classification
A63B21/072A63B21/06A63B21/062A63B21/075
Examiner
DONNELLY, JEROME W.
Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Counsel of record

Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Floriey Industries International Co., Ltd. (“Floriey”) and Defendant Life Pro Fitness LLC (“Life Pro”) hereby stipulate to the voluntary dismissal of the above-captioned action with prejudice pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement executed by the parties, with each Party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs”

Case 1:22-cv-05791 · E.D.N.Y. · closed 18 September 2023
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 1:22-cv-05791?

1:22-cv-05791 is a patent infringement action brought by Floriey Industries International Co., Ltd. against Life Pro Fitness, LLC, filed on 28 Sep 2022 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The case closed on 18 September 2023.

Which patent was asserted in 1:22-cv-05791?

US6656093B2 (“Adjustable dumbbell having easily adjusting structure”), assigned to CHEN, PAUL, currently inactive. The record also lists Dumbbells.

How was case 1:22-cv-05791 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is voluntary dismissal. The termination text reads: “Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Floriey Industries International Co., Ltd. (“Floriey”) and Defendant Life Pro Fitness LLC (“Life Pro”) hereby stipulate to the voluntary dismissal of the above-captioned action with prejudice pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement executed by the parties, with each Party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs”

What does dismissal with prejudice mean?

A dismissal with prejudice permanently ends the claims that were filed, so the same claims cannot be brought again against that defendant. It is the usual form when the parties have settled.

How long did case 1:22-cv-05791 take?

355 calendar days, from filing on 28 Sep 2022 to closure on 18 September 2023.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 1:22-cv-05791?

Anthony H. Handal is recorded as counsel for plaintiff Floriey Industries International. Max Moskowitz. appears for defendant Life Pro Fitness.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 1:22-cv-05791 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 1:22-cv-05791 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.