Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
Focus Global Solutions v. Zoho | Patent Lawsuit 6:23-cv-00167

Focus Global Solutions, LLC v. Zoho Corporation

6:23-cv-00167 W.D. Tex. Closed US6978301B2
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 6 Mar 2023 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas and closed 17 Aug 2023, with US6978301B2 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: voluntary dismissal.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Patent involved
US6978301B2
Application no.
US09/799579
Case no.
6:23-cv-00167
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
W.D. Tex.
Court level
District Court
Case region
Texas
Chief judge
Fred Biery
Trial level
First instance
Filed – Closed
6 Mar 2023 – 17 Aug 2023
Duration
164 days
Basis of termination
Voluntary dismissal
Products & marks
System and method for configuring a network device
Validity challenges
None recorded
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 6:23-cv-00167, United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US6978301B2 Inactive App. US09/799579

System and method for configuring a network device

A system and method for communicating with network devices without regard to the device type and/or manufacturer is described. In one embodiment, the present invention provides a global graphical user interface (GUI) for communicating with various network devices. The global GUI includes an intuitive interface driven by a template library. For each device type and each device manufacturer, this template library can store both the attribute fields required for device configuration and the format for communicating those attribute fields. When a network administrator wants to communicate with a particular network device, the template associated with that device can be retrieved from the template library. The network administrator can then populate the attribute fields of that template with the appropriate data. This attribute data can be formatted and provided to the network device.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Inactive
Granted
20 Dec 2005
Earliest priority
6 Dec 2000
Est. expiry
23 Oct 2022
Validity challenges
None recorded
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
G06F15/173H04L41/0894H04L41/0895
Prosecution counsel
KINNEY & LANGE, P.A.
Examiner
BAROT, BHARAT
US6978301B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US6978301B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2
Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Counsel of record

Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff hereby dismisses this action without prejudice. Defendant has not yet answered the Complaint or moved for summary judgment.”

Case 6:23-cv-00167 · W.D. Tex. · closed 17 August 2023
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 6:23-cv-00167?

6:23-cv-00167 is a patent infringement action brought by Focus Global Solutions, LLC against Zoho Corporation, filed on 6 Mar 2023 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. The case closed on 17 August 2023.

Which patent was asserted in 6:23-cv-00167?

US6978301B2 (“System and method for configuring a network device”), assigned to FOCUS GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LLC, currently inactive. The record also lists System and method for configuring a network device.

How was case 6:23-cv-00167 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is voluntary dismissal. The termination text reads: “Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff hereby dismisses this action without prejudice. Defendant has not yet answered the Complaint or moved for summary judgment.”

What does dismissal without prejudice mean?

A dismissal without prejudice ends this action but leaves the claims alive — the plaintiff may file them again later, subject to the limitation period.

How long did case 6:23-cv-00167 take?

164 calendar days, from filing on 6 Mar 2023 to closure on 17 August 2023.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 6:23-cv-00167?

Chief Judge Fred Biery presided. Isaac Rabicoff is recorded as counsel for plaintiff Focus Global Solutions. Carolyn Chang, Julie Polansky Bell, Miguel Villarreal Jr and Ryan J. Marton appear for defendant Zoho.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 6:23-cv-00167 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 6:23-cv-00167 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.