“Force MOS acquired all rights to the ’409 Patent from Dr. Fu-Yuan Hshieh; 2. ASUSTeK has infringed Claims 1, 2, and 3 of the ’634 Patent; 3. ASUSTeK has infringed Claim 1 of the ’409 Patent; 4. Claim 1 of the ’409 Patent is not invalid; 5. ASUSTeK’s infringement was willful; 6. Force MOS is awarded damages and shall have and recover from and against ASUSTeK the sum of $10,500,000.00 U.S. Dollars as a lump sum reasonable royalty payment for ASUSTeK’s above infringement of the ’634 and ’409 Patents; 7. Notwithstanding the jury’s finding of willfulness, the Court having considered the totality of the circumstances together with the material benefit of having presided throughout the jury trial and having seen the same evidence and heard the same arguments as the jury, and mindful that enhancement is generally reserved for “egregious cases of culpable behavior,”2 concludes that enhancement of the compensatory award herein is not warranted under 35 U.S.C. § 284 and consequently, the Court elects not to enhance the damages awarded herein; 8. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d), Local Rule CV-54, and 28 U.S.C. § 1920, Force MOS is the prevailing party in this case and shall recover its costs from ASUSTeK. Accordingly, Force MOS is directed to file its Bill of Costs; Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284 and Supreme Court guidance that “prejudgment interest should ordinarily be awarded absent some justification for withholding such an award,”3 the Court awards pre-judgment interest applicable to all sums awarded herein, calculated at the 5-year U.S. Treasury Bill rate, compounded quarterly, from the date of infringement through the date of entry of this Judgment;4 and 10. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961, the Court awards post-judgment interest applicable to all sums awarded herein, at the statutory rate, from the date of entry of this Judgment until paid. All other requests for relief now pending and requested by either party but not specifically addressed herein are DENIED.”