Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
Gamehancement v. Infineon Technologies Americas | Patent Lawsuit 6:23-cv-00843

Gamehancement, LLC v. Infineon Technologies Americas, Corp.

6:23-cv-00843 W.D. Tex. Closed US7849619B2
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 9 Dec 2023 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas and closed 15 Dec 2023, with US7849619B2 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: voluntary dismissal.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Patent involved
US7849619B2
Application no.
US11/060033
Case no.
6:23-cv-00843
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
W.D. Tex.
Court level
District Court
Case region
Texas
Chief judge
None recorded
Trial level
First instance
Filed – Closed
9 Dec 2023 – 15 Dec 2023
Duration
6 days
Basis of termination
Voluntary dismissal
Products & marks
Enhanced identification appliance for verifying and authenticating the bearer through biometric data
Validity challenges
None recorded
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 6:23-cv-00843, United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US7849619B2 Inactive App. US11/060033

Enhanced identification appliance for verifying and authenticating the bearer through biometric data

An enhanced identification appliance, such as a wristband, bracelet, patch, headband, neckband, ankleband, legband, card, sticker, or other wearable appliance, may have a biometric, chemical, optical, heat, pressure, humidity, electromagnetic, and/or acoustic sensor, various opto-electronics and/or various security features such as tamper-evident and tamper-resistant features. The sensors may obtain wearer-related information such as a fingerprint, retina, iris, blood, DNA, genetic data, voice pattern, temperature and other characteristic. Security features include a fastener on the identification appliance, which indicates whether the appliance has been attached to a wearer and if so, enables circuit functions. If one tampers with the appliance, circuit functions may be disabled, certain data erased, and/or evidence of tampering made apparent. The appliance may monitor the location or determine the identity of vehicle passengers for an airplane, train, boat, bus, etc. Alternatively, the identification band may contain a person’s immigration status.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Inactive
Granted
14 Dec 2010
Est. expiry
23 Apr 2024
Validity challenges
None recorded
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
A44C5/00A61B5/117B42D15/10G06K17/00G06K19/04G06K19/07G06K19/073G06K19/077G06K19/10
Examiner
HOGE, GARY C
US7849619B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US7849619B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2
Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Counsel of record

AttorneyForRole
Isaac RabicoffGamehancement, LLCPlaintiff
Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff hereby dismisses this action without prejudice. Defendant has not yet answered the Complaint or moved for summary judgment.”

Case 6:23-cv-00843 · W.D. Tex. · closed 15 December 2023
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 6:23-cv-00843?

6:23-cv-00843 is a patent infringement action brought by Gamehancement, LLC against Infineon Technologies Americas, Corp., filed on 9 Dec 2023 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. The case closed on 15 December 2023.

Which patent was asserted in 6:23-cv-00843?

US7849619B2 (“Enhanced identification appliance for verifying and authenticating the bearer through biometric data”), assigned to MIND FUSION, LLC, currently inactive. The record also lists Enhanced identification appliance for verifying and authenticating the bearer through biometric data.

How was case 6:23-cv-00843 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is voluntary dismissal. The termination text reads: “Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff hereby dismisses this action without prejudice. Defendant has not yet answered the Complaint or moved for summary judgment.”

What does dismissal without prejudice mean?

A dismissal without prejudice ends this action but leaves the claims alive — the plaintiff may file them again later, subject to the limitation period.

How long did case 6:23-cv-00843 take?

6 calendar days, from filing on 9 Dec 2023 to closure on 15 December 2023.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 6:23-cv-00843?

Isaac Rabicoff is recorded as counsel for plaintiff Gamehancement.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 6:23-cv-00843 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 6:23-cv-00843 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.