Garden Hose Patent Dispute Ends in Settlement: Fixin Chips BH LLC v. E. Mishan & Sons
What would you like to do next?
Choose your path based on your current needs:
📋 Case Summary
| Case Name | Fixin Chips BH LLC v. E. Mishan & Sons, Inc. |
| Case Number | 1:25-cv-03865 (SDNY) |
| Court | Southern District of New York |
| Duration | May 2025 – Feb 2026 9 months |
| Outcome | Settlement in Principle |
| Patents at Issue | |
| Accused Products | Non-expandable garden hose with three-layer construction |
Case Overview
The Parties
⚖️ Plaintiff
Patent-holding entity asserting IP rights over its patented garden hose construction, actively enforcing its portfolio.
🛡️ Defendant
New York-based consumer products company with an established presence in general merchandise and home goods market.
Patents at Issue
This case involved **U.S. Patent No. US11732826B2** (Application No. US17/521376), covering a distinctively constructed garden hose product. The patent protects a hose product comprising three discrete structural layers — (i) a plastic inner lining, (ii) a metal middle portion, and (iii) a fabric outer portion. This layered architecture appears engineered to provide durability, flexibility, and resistance to environmental wear.
- • US11732826B2 — Non-expandable garden hose construction (plastic inner, metal middle, fabric outer)
Designing a similar product?
Check if your multi-layer hose design might infringe this or related patents before launch.
The Verdict & Legal Analysis
Outcome
The case was resolved through a **settlement in principle**, as reported to the court via ECF No. 50. Judge Vyskocil issued a discontinuance order on February 11, 2026, dismissing the action **without costs to either party and without prejudice**, subject to a restoration deadline of **March 12, 2026**. No specific damages amount or licensing terms were publicly disclosed.
Legal Significance
The **Southern District of New York** continues to attract IP enforcement actions involving commercial product disputes, particularly where defendant companies are headquartered or do substantial business in New York. The court cited Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004) in its order, which addresses the procedural standard for discontinuing actions subject to settlement finalization. This confirms the court applied standard Second Circuit practice for conditional settlements.
Freedom to Operate (FTO) Analysis
This case highlights critical IP risks in consumer hardware design. Choose your next step:
📋 Understand This Case’s Impact
Learn about the specific risks and implications from this litigation.
- View all related patents in this technology space
- See which companies are most active in hose patents
- Understand claim construction patterns
🔍 Check My Product’s Risk
Run a comprehensive FTO analysis for your own technology or product.
- Input your product description or technical features
- AI identifies potentially blocking patents
- Get actionable risk assessment report
High Risk Area
Multi-layer garden hose constructions
50+ Related Patents
In consumer hardware space
Design-Around Options
Feasible for layered products
✅ Key Takeaways
Structural product patents with layer-by-layer claim definitions create strong, identifiable infringement theories suited to early enforcement.
Search related case law →SDNY remains a viable and efficient venue for commercial patent disputes with New York-based defendants, creating early settlement leverage.
Explore court dockets →Frequently Asked Questions
The case involved U.S. Patent No. US11732826B2 (Application No. US17/521376), covering a non-expandable garden hose with a three-layer construction.
The parties reached a settlement in principle, and the SDNY issued a discontinuance order on February 11, 2026. Financial terms were not publicly disclosed.
It reinforces that structurally specific product patents in the consumer goods space are enforceable and that SDNY is a viable venue for such claims. R&D teams should conduct FTO reviews for layered hose and tubing products.
Ready to Strengthen Your Patent Strategy?
Join 18,000+ IP professionals using PatSnap Eureka to conduct prior art searches, draft patents, and analyse competitive landscapes with AI-powered precision.
References
- USPTO Patent Search — US11732826B2
- PACER Case Lookup — SDNY
- SDNY Local Patent Rules
- Cornell Legal Information Institute — Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc.
- PatSnap — AI-native platform for global innovation intelligence
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. All case information is drawn from publicly available court records. For platform capabilities, visit PatSnap.