Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
GenghisComm v. Asustek Computer | Patent Lawsuit 2:23-cv-00099

GenghisComm Holdings, LLC v. Asustek Computer, Inc.

2:23-cv-00099 E.D. Tex. Closed 3 patents
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 9 Mar 2023 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and closed 5 Dec 2023, with 3 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: dismissed with prejudice.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Case no.
2:23-cv-00099
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
E.D. Tex.
Court level
District Court
Case region
Texas
Chief judge
None recorded
Trial level
First instance
Filed – Closed
9 Mar 2023 – 5 Dec 2023
Duration
271 days
Basis of termination
Dismissed with Prejudice
Products & marks
Coordinated multipoint systems · Spreading and precoding in OFDM · Transmit pre-coding
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 2:23-cv-00099, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US11252005B1 Inactive App. US16/940383

Spreading and precoding in OFDM

An OFDM transmitter spreads original data symbols with a complex-valued spreading matrix derived from a discrete Fourier transform. Spread data symbols are mapped to OFDM subcarriers. Spreading and mapping are configured to produce a transmitted spread-OFDM signal with a low peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) and orthogonal code spaces. In MIMO systems, the complex-valued spreading matrix can comprise a MIMO precoding matrix, and the code spaces can comprise MIMO subspaces. In Cooperative-MIMO, a combination of low code-space cross correlation and low PAPR can be achieved.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Inactive
Granted
15 Feb 2022
Earliest priority
2 Aug 2004
Est. expiry
10 Oct 2025
Validity challenges
2 on recordIPR2025-00791 · Patentability · filed by Samsung Electronics Co Ltd90019847 · EPR · filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
H04L27/26H04L12/24H04L12/28H04W72/04H04B7/0456H04L12/707H04J13/00H04L12/801H04B7/024H04W52/42H04B7/026H04B7/0452H04B7/06H04J11/00H04J13/12H04L5/00H04B7/185H04W88/02H04W84/18H04L45/24
Examiner
LO, DIANE L
US11252005B1 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US11252005B1 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2
US11424792B2 Inactive App. US17/183114

Coordinated multipoint systems

A flexible channel bandwidth for mobile radio communications is provided by provisioning a set of Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) subcarriers for mobile radio communications; encoding data symbols with polyphase codes derived from a discrete Fourier transform to produce encoded data symbols; and modulating the encoded data symbols onto the OFDM subcarriers to produce a superposition signal that resembles a single-carrier signal and has one of a plurality of different symbol durations. The provisioning comprises selecting one of a plurality of different selectable subcarrier spacings, to provide for the one of the plurality of different symbol durations.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Inactive
Granted
23 Aug 2022
Est. expiry
16 Oct 2025
Validity challenges
2 on recordIPR2025-00793 · Patentability · filed by Samsung Electronics Co Ltd90019848 · EPR · filed by Samsung Eletronics Co., Ltd.
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
H04B7/0456H04B1/00H04B7/024H04B7/0452H04B7/06
Examiner
KUMAR, SHAILENDRA
US11424792B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US11424792B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2

Also asserted in this case

1 more

The docket lists 3 asserted patents. Full bibliographic detail, drawings and prosecution history for the remaining asserted patent are one query away in Eureka.

Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Counsel of record

Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“Before the Court is the Stipulation of Dismissal Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) by GenghisComm Holdings LLC and Defendant ASUSTeK Computer Inc. (Dkt. No. 46.) in the Stipulation, the parties represent that the above-captioned cases have been resolved and request dismissal of the above-captioned actions with prejudice. (Id. at 1). Having considered the Stipulation, the Court ACCEPTS AND ACKNOWLEDGES that all claims and causes of action asserted between plaintiff and Defendant in the abovecaptioned cases are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party is to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees. All pending requests for relief in the above-captioned case not explicitly granted herein are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE both of the above captioned cases.”

Case 2:23-cv-00099 · E.D. Tex. · closed 5 December 2023
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 2:23-cv-00099?

2:23-cv-00099 is a patent infringement action brought by GenghisComm Holdings, LLC against Asustek Computer, Inc., filed on 9 Mar 2023 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The case closed on 5 December 2023.

Which patents were asserted in 2:23-cv-00099?

US11252005B1 (“Spreading and precoding in OFDM”), assigned to GENGHISCOMM HOLDINGS, LLC, currently inactive; US11424792B2 (“Coordinated multipoint systems”), assigned to GENGHISCOMM HOLDINGS, LLC, currently inactive; US11381285B1 (“Transmit pre-coding”), assigned to GENGHISCOMM HOLDINGS, LLC. The record also lists Coordinated multipoint systems, Spreading and precoding in OFDM and Transmit pre-coding.

How was case 2:23-cv-00099 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is dismissed with prejudice. The termination text reads: “Before the Court is the Stipulation of Dismissal Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) by GenghisComm Holdings LLC and Defendant ASUSTeK Computer Inc. (Dkt. No. 46.) in the Stipulation, the parties represent that the above-captioned cases have been resolved and request dismissal of the above-captioned actions with prejudice. (Id. at 1). Having considered the Stipulation, the Court ACCEPTS AND ACKNOWLEDGES that all claims and causes of action asserted between plaintiff and Defendant in the abovecaptioned cases are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party is to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorney

What does dismissal with prejudice mean?

A dismissal with prejudice permanently ends the claims that were filed, so the same claims cannot be brought again against that defendant. It is the usual form when the parties have settled.

How long did case 2:23-cv-00099 take?

271 calendar days, from filing on 9 Mar 2023 to closure on 5 December 2023.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 2:23-cv-00099?

Alison Aubry Richards is recorded as counsel for plaintiff GenghisComm.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 2:23-cv-00099 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 2:23-cv-00099 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.