Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
Healthness v. Polar Electro | Patent Lawsuit 1:23-cv-01762

Healthness, LLC v. Polar Electro, Inc.

1:23-cv-01762 S.D.N.Y. Closed 2 patents
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 1 Mar 2023 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and closed 12 Jul 2023, with 2 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: voluntary dismissal.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Patents involved
US6445298B1US6696957B2
Case no.
1:23-cv-01762
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
S.D.N.Y.
Court level
District Court
Case region
New York
Trial level
First instance
Filed – Closed
1 Mar 2023 – 12 Jul 2023
Duration
133 days
Basis of termination
Voluntary dismissal
Products & marks
System and method for remotely monitoring movement of individuals
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 1:23-cv-01762, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US6445298B1 Inactive App. US09/746394

System and method for remotely monitoring movement of individuals

A system and method for remotely ascertaining movement or non-movement of an individual in order to determine a possible emergency condition. The system includes a plurality of base systems, a central monitoring system, and a plurality of client systems. Each base system is associated with a site to be monitored and includes at least one monitoring device for generating information in response to detected movement of an individual. The central monitoring system is remotely located from the base systems and is coupled thereto for receiving the generated information. The central monitoring system includes a database for storing and retrieving at least a portion of the generated information from each base system. Each client system is remotely located from the base systems and central monitoring system and is couplable to the central monitoring system for retrieving at least a portion of the stored information in the database. In this manner, the client system is able to determine the condition of the individual in a non-intrusive manner. The system can also be used in an alarm mode to determine when unauthorized persons have entered the site.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Inactive
Granted
3 Sep 2002
Est. expiry
21 Dec 2020
Validity challenges
None recorded
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
G08B13/194G08B13/196G08B13/189G08B25/08G08B13/19
Examiner
WU, DANIEL J.
US6696957B2 Inactive App. US10/156254

System and method for remotely monitoring movement of individuals

A system and method for remotely ascertaining movement or non-movement of an individual in order to determine a possible emergency condition. The system includes a plurality of base systems, a central monitoring system, and a plurality of client systems. Each base system is associated with a site to be monitored and includes at least one monitoring device for generating information in response to detected movement of an individual. The central monitoring system is remotely located from the base systems and is coupled thereto for receiving the generated information. The central monitoring system includes a database for storing and retrieving at least a portion of the generated information from each base system. Each client system is remotely located from the base systems and central monitoring system and is couplable to the central monitoring system for retrieving at least a portion of the stored information in the database. In this manner, the client system is able to determine the condition of the individual in a non-intrusive manner. The system can also be used in an alarm mode to determine when unauthorized persons have entered the site.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Inactive
Granted
24 Feb 2004
Est. expiry
21 Dec 2020
Validity challenges
None recorded
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
G08B13/19G08B13/194G08B13/189G08B13/196G08B25/08
Examiner
WU, DANIEL J.
Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Counsel of record

AttorneyForRole
Andrew S. CurfmanHealthness, LLCPlaintiff
Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“Now comes Plaintiff Healthness LLC, by and through its counsel, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), and hereby voluntarily dismisses all of the claims asserted against Defendant Polar Electro Inc. in the within action WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Polar Electro Inc. has not served an answer or a motion for summary judgment.”

Case 1:23-cv-01762 · S.D.N.Y. · closed 12 July 2023
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 1:23-cv-01762?

1:23-cv-01762 is a patent infringement action brought by Healthness, LLC against Polar Electro, Inc., filed on 1 Mar 2023 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The case closed on 12 July 2023.

Which patents were asserted in 1:23-cv-01762?

US6445298B1 (“System and method for remotely monitoring movement of individuals”), assigned to HEALTHNESS LLC, currently inactive; US6696957B2 (“System and method for remotely monitoring movement of individuals”), assigned to CVG MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, currently inactive. The record also lists System and method for remotely monitoring movement of individuals.

How was case 1:23-cv-01762 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is voluntary dismissal. The termination text reads: “Now comes Plaintiff Healthness LLC, by and through its counsel, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), and hereby voluntarily dismisses all of the claims asserted against Defendant Polar Electro Inc. in the within action WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Polar Electro Inc. has not served an answer or a motion for summary judgment.”

What does dismissal without prejudice mean?

A dismissal without prejudice ends this action but leaves the claims alive — the plaintiff may file them again later, subject to the limitation period.

How long did case 1:23-cv-01762 take?

133 calendar days, from filing on 1 Mar 2023 to closure on 12 July 2023.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 1:23-cv-01762?

Chief Judge Vernon S. Broderick presided. Andrew S. Curfman is recorded as counsel for plaintiff Healthness.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 1:23-cv-01762 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 1:23-cv-01762 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.