Heritage IP, LLC v. RM Acquisition, LLC
Infringement action filed 31 Jul 2022 in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware and closed 26 Jan 2023, with US7221200B1 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: voluntary dismissal.
Case record
- Patent involved
- US7221200B1
- Application no.
- US11/075632
- Case no.
- 1:22-cv-01019
- Verdict cause
- Infringement action
- Court
- D. Del.
- Court level
- District Court
- Case region
- Delaware
- Chief judge
- Gregory B. Williams
- Trial level
- First instance
- Filed – Closed
- 31 Jul 2022 – 26 Jan 2023
- Duration
- 179 days
- Basis of termination
- Voluntary dismissal
- Products & marks
- Programmable low voltage reset apparatus for multi-Vdd chips
- Validity challenges
- None recorded
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
Get an FTO claim chart- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
Programmable low voltage reset apparatus for multi-Vdd chips
A programmable low voltage reset apparatus for a device having a plurality of power supplies comprises a low voltage signal generator for sensing when a power supply output decreases below a predetermined voltage and generating a reset signal, a reset selector for selecting one of the power supplies, and a programmable reference voltage for varying a reference voltage according to the voltage of the selected power supply.
- Legal status
- Inactive
- Granted
- 22 May 2007
- Earliest priority
- 24 Mar 2004
- Est. expiry
- 29 Apr 2025
- Validity challenges
- None recorded
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- KOTRA, PRASAD · THAMARAN, SUNIL · SHAH, SHAILESH
- Classification
- H03L7/00
- Prosecution counsel
- Miller Nash LLP
- Examiner
- LE, DINH T.
Parties of record
Heritage IP, LLC
- Core tech
- H03L7/00
- Counsel
- Jimmy C. Chong
- Firm
- Chong Law Firm PA
RM Acquisition, LLC
- Core tech
- Not recorded
- Counsel
- Not recorded
- Firm
- Not recorded
Counsel of record
| Attorney | For | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jimmy C. Chong | Heritage IP, LLC | Plaintiff |
Basis of termination
From the record · verbatim“Now comes Plaintiff, Heritage IP LLC, by and through its counsel, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), and hereby voluntarily dismisses all of the claims asserted against Defendant RM Acquisition, LLC in the within action With Prejudice with each party bearing their own costs and fees. RM Acquisition, LLC has not filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment.”
Case 1:22-cv-01019 · D. Del. · closed 26 January 2023
Related cases
Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.
Frequently asked questions
What is case 1:22-cv-01019?
1:22-cv-01019 is a patent infringement action brought by Heritage IP, LLC against RM Acquisition, LLC, filed on 31 Jul 2022 in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The case closed on 26 January 2023.
Which patent was asserted in 1:22-cv-01019?
US7221200B1 (“Programmable low voltage reset apparatus for multi-Vdd chips”), assigned to HERITAGE IP LLC, currently inactive. The record also lists Programmable low voltage reset apparatus for multi-Vdd chips.
How was case 1:22-cv-01019 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is voluntary dismissal. The termination text reads: “Now comes Plaintiff, Heritage IP LLC, by and through its counsel, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), and hereby voluntarily dismisses all of the claims asserted against Defendant RM Acquisition, LLC in the within action With Prejudice with each party bearing their own costs and fees. RM Acquisition, LLC has not filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment.”
What does dismissal with prejudice mean?
A dismissal with prejudice permanently ends the claims that were filed, so the same claims cannot be brought again against that defendant. It is the usual form when the parties have settled.
How long did case 1:22-cv-01019 take?
179 calendar days, from filing on 31 Jul 2022 to closure on 26 January 2023.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 1:22-cv-01019?
Chief Judge Gregory B. Williams presided. Jimmy C. Chong is recorded as counsel for plaintiff Heritage IP.
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 1:22-cv-01019 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.