Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
HID Global et al. v. WaveLynx Technologies | Patent Lawsuit 1:22-cv-00362

HID Global, Corp. et al. v. WaveLynx Technologies Corporation

1:22-cv-00362 D. Del. Closed 2 patents
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 21 Mar 2022 in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware and closed 19 May 2023, with 2 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: case transferred.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Patents involved
US8943562B2US7439862B2
Case no.
1:22-cv-00362
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
D. Del.
Court level
District Court
Case region
Delaware
Trial level
First instance
Filed – Closed
21 Mar 2022 – 19 May 2023
Duration
424 days
Basis of termination
Case Transferred
Products & marks
Antenna array for an RFID reader compatible with transponders operating at different carrier frequencies · Secure Wiegand communications
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 1:22-cv-00362, United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US8943562B2 Active App. US13/689088

Secure Wiegand communications

The present invention is directed toward secure access systems. Specifically, a method and system is provided that enhances the security of unidirectional communication protocols used in access control systems, such as the Wiegand protocol. The enhancements may include obfuscation of data, a two-way packet-mode communications, and blind synchronization of pseudo-random number generators.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Active
Granted
27 Jan 2015
Earliest priority
11 Aug 2008
Est. expiry
11 Aug 2029
Validity challenges
1 on recordIPR2023-01018 · Patentability · filed by WAVELYNX TECHNOLOGIES CORP
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
G06F7/04G06F21/60H04L9/06H04L9/12H04L9/16H04L9/32H04L29/06
Prosecution counsel
Sheridan Ross PC
Examiner
LEMMA, SAMSON
US8943562B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US7439862B2 Inactive App. US11/016576

Antenna array for an RFID reader compatible with transponders operating at different carrier frequencies

An antenna array is provided for an RFID reader, which includes a first reader antenna tuned to operate at a first frequency and a second reader antenna tuned to operate at a second frequency different from the first frequency. The first and second antennas are preferably arranged in an overlapping arrangement or an opposing magnetic flux arrangement to reduce the effect of antenna self resonance.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Inactive
Granted
21 Oct 2008
Est. expiry
10 Mar 2025
Validity challenges
1 on recordIPR2023-00730 · Patentability · filed by WAVELYNX TECHNOLOGIES CORP
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
G08B13/14G06K7/08H01Q5/10
Prosecution counsel
Sheridan Ross PC
Examiner
GOINS, DAVETTA W.
US7439862B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US7439862B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2
Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Counsel of record

Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“HID Global Corporation and ASSA ABLOY AB (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and WaveLynx Technologies Corporation (“WaveLynx” or “Defendant”) stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on January 20, 2023, WaveLynx, a company based in Broomfield, Colorado, filed a Motion to Transfer the case to the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado (“District of Colorado”) (D.I. 28), which is fully briefed (D.I. 29-31, 36, 40); WHEREAS, on April 19, 2023, the parties submitted a proposed scheduling order (D.I. 45), which has not been entered; WHEREAS, the parties, having further met and conferred, agree to transfer this case to the District of Colorado; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the parties and subject to the approval of the Court, that: ( 1) the case is hereby transferred to the District of Colorado; and (2) WaveLynx’s Motion to Transfer (D.I. 28) is denied as moot, without prejudice to either party.”

Case 1:22-cv-00362 · D. Del. · closed 19 May 2023
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 1:22-cv-00362?

1:22-cv-00362 is a patent infringement action brought by HID Global, Corp. against WaveLynx Technologies Corporation, filed on 21 Mar 2022 in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The case closed on 19 May 2023.

Which patents were asserted in 1:22-cv-00362?

US8943562B2 (“Secure Wiegand communications”), assigned to ASSA ABLOY AB, currently active; US7439862B2 (“Antenna array for an RFID reader compatible with transponders operating at different carrier frequencies”), assigned to ASSA ABLOY AB, currently inactive. The record also lists Antenna array for an RFID reader compatible with transponders operating at different carrier frequencies and Secure Wiegand communications.

How was case 1:22-cv-00362 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is case transferred. The termination text reads: “HID Global Corporation and ASSA ABLOY AB (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and WaveLynx Technologies Corporation (“WaveLynx” or “Defendant”) stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on January 20, 2023, WaveLynx, a company based in Broomfield, Colorado, filed a Motion to Transfer the case to the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado (“District of Colorado”) (D.I. 28), which is fully briefed (D.I. 29-31, 36, 40); WHEREAS, on April 19, 2023, the parties submitted a proposed scheduling order (D.I. 45), which has not been entered; WHEREAS, the parties, having further met and conferred, agree to trans

What does dismissal without prejudice mean?

A dismissal without prejudice ends this action but leaves the claims alive — the plaintiff may file them again later, subject to the limitation period.

How long did case 1:22-cv-00362 take?

424 calendar days, from filing on 21 Mar 2022 to closure on 19 May 2023.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 1:22-cv-00362?

Chief Judge Gregory B. Williams presided. AnnaMartina Tyreus Hufnal, Chris Marchese, Noah C. Graubart, Taylor Burgener and Tim Rawson are recorded as counsel for plaintiff HID Global. Thatcher A. Rahmeier and Timothy E. Grimsrud appear for defendant WaveLynx Technologies.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 1:22-cv-00362 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 1:22-cv-00362 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.