ICON Worldwide Pty LTD v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations on Schedule A
Infringement action filed 9 Jan 2026 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois and closed 29 Jan 2026, with USD1048860S asserted. Recorded basis of termination: .
Case record
- Patent involved
- USD1048860S
- Application no.
- US29/874400
- Case no.
- 1:26-cv-00271
- Verdict cause
- Infringement action
- Court
- N.D. Ill.
- Court level
- District Court
- Case region
- Illinois
- Chief judge
- John F. Kness
- Trial level
- First instance
- Filed – Closed
- 9 Jan 2026 – 29 Jan 2026
- Duration
- 20 days
- Basis of termination
- None recorded
- Products & marks
- Wall mount
- Validity challenges
- None recorded
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
Get an FTO claim chart- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
Wall mount
- Legal status
- Active
- Granted
- 29 Oct 2024
- Earliest priority
- 19 Oct 2022
- Est. expiry
- 29 Oct 2039
- Validity challenges
- None recorded
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- ZORE, MATHEW
- Prosecution counsel
- TRASKBRITT, P.C.
- Examiner
- KEARNEY, RICHARD
Parties of record
ICON Worldwide Pty LTD
- Core tech
- Not recorded
- Counsel
- Robert Michael Dewitty
- Firm
- Dewitty And Associates, Chtd.
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations on Schedule A
- Core tech
- Not recorded
- Counsel
- Not recorded
- Firm
- Not recorded
Counsel of record
| Attorney | For | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Robert Michael Dewitty | ICON Worldwide Pty LTD | Plaintiff |
Basis of termination
From the record · verbatim“Plaintiff Icon Worldwide Pty LTD, by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby gives notice of voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), and states as follows: 1. This notice effects the dismissal of the entire action as to all defendants identified in Schedule A to the Complaint. 2. The dismissal is without prejudice.”
Case 1:26-cv-00271 · N.D. Ill. · closed 29 January 2026
Related cases
Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.
Frequently asked questions
What is case 1:26-cv-00271?
1:26-cv-00271 is a patent infringement action brought by ICON Worldwide Pty LTD against The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations on Schedule A, filed on 9 Jan 2026 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The case closed on 29 January 2026.
Which patent was asserted in 1:26-cv-00271?
USD1048860S (“Wall mount”), assigned to ICON WORLDWIDE PTY LTD, currently active. The record also lists Wall mount.
How was case 1:26-cv-00271 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is not recorded. The termination text reads: “Plaintiff Icon Worldwide Pty LTD, by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby gives notice of voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), and states as follows: 1. This notice effects the dismissal of the entire action as to all defendants identified in Schedule A to the Complaint. 2. The dismissal is without prejudice.”
What does dismissal without prejudice mean?
A dismissal without prejudice ends this action but leaves the claims alive — the plaintiff may file them again later, subject to the limitation period.
How long did case 1:26-cv-00271 take?
20 calendar days, from filing on 9 Jan 2026 to closure on 29 January 2026.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 1:26-cv-00271?
Chief Judge John F. Kness presided. Robert Michael Dewitty is recorded as counsel for plaintiff ICON Worldwide Pty.
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 1:26-cv-00271 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.