Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
Intercurrency Software v. TradeSanta Global | Patent Lawsuit 2:24-cv-00390

Intercurrency Software, LLC v. TradeSanta Global Limited

2:24-cv-00390 E.D. Tex. Closed 3 patents
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 29 May 2024 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and closed 18 Jun 2026, with 3 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: dismissed without prejudice.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Case no.
2:24-cv-00390
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
E.D. Tex.
Court level
District Court
Case region
Texas
Chief judge
Rodney Gilstrap
Trial level
First instance
Filed – Closed
29 May 2024 – 18 Jun 2026
Duration
750 days
Basis of termination
Dismissed without Prejudice
Products & marks
TradeSanta platforms and systems · https://tradesanta.com/
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 2:24-cv-00390, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US10776863B1 Active App. US16/113289

Method and apparatus for displaying trading assets in a preferred currency

Techniques to display trading assets in a preferred currency are described. According to one aspect of the present invention, a three-tier architecture is presented and includes a brokerage, a market exchange and a currency exchange. Through a consolidated trading platform, the brokerage presents all price, quotas, transactions or settlements in a preferred currency, in conjunction with the market exchange and the currency exchange. As a result, a trader always knows exactly what he/she may end up with a transaction of an asset, where a prevailing exchange rate is obtained prior to a transaction to prevent uncertainty in currency exchanges in another time.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Active
Granted
15 Sep 2020
Est. expiry
24 May 2027
Validity challenges
3 on recordIPR2024-00375 · Patentability · filed by ASKELADDEN L.L.CIPR2024-01278 · Patentability · filed by BITSGAP HOLDING OUIPR2024-00375 · Patentability · filed by ASKELADDEN L.L.C
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
G06Q40/00G06Q40/04
Prosecution counsel
LogicPatents, LLC
Examiner
KAZIMI, HANI M
US10776863B1 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US10776863B1 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2
US11449930B1 Active App. US17/019359

Method and apparatus for trading assets in different currencies

Techniques to display trading assets in a preferred currency are described. According to one aspect of the present invention, a three-tier architecture is presented and includes a brokerage, a market exchange and a currency exchange. Through a consolidated trading platform, the brokerage presents all price, quotas, transactions or settlements in a preferred currency, in conjunction with the market exchange and the currency exchange. As a result, a trader always knows exactly what he/she may end up with a transaction of an asset, where a prevailing exchange rate is obtained prior to a transaction to prevent uncertainty in currency exchanges in another time.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Active
Granted
20 Sep 2022
Est. expiry
18 Apr 2027
Validity challenges
3 on recordIPR2024-01279 · Patentability · filed by BITSGAP HOLDING OUIPR2024-00378 · Patentability · filed by ASKELADDEN L.L.CIPR2024-00378 · Patentability · filed by INTERCURRENCY SOFTWARE LLC
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
G06Q40/00G06Q40/04
Prosecution counsel
LogicPatents, LLC
Examiner
KAZIMI, HANI M
US11449930B1 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US11449930B1 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2

Also asserted in this case

1 more

The docket lists 3 asserted patents. Full bibliographic detail, drawings and prosecution history for the remaining asserted patent are one query away in Eureka.

Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Counsel of record

Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (the “Notice”). (Dkt. No. 4.) In the Notice, Plaintiff voluntarily dismisses the above-captioned case against Defendant without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Id. at 1.) Defendant has not yet answered the Complaint or moved for summary judgment. (Id.) Having considered the Notice, the Court ACCEPTS AND ACKNOWLEDGES that all claims by Plaintiff against Defendant in the above-captioned case are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Each party is to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees. All pending requests for relief in the above-captioned case between Plaintiff and Defendant not explicitly granted herein are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the abovecaptioned case as no parties or claims remain.”

Case 2:24-cv-00390 · E.D. Tex. · closed 18 June 2026
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 2:24-cv-00390?

2:24-cv-00390 is a patent infringement action brought by Intercurrency Software, LLC against TradeSanta Global Limited, filed on 29 May 2024 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The case closed on 18 June 2026.

Which patents were asserted in 2:24-cv-00390?

US10776863B1 (“Method and apparatus for displaying trading assets in a preferred currency”), assigned to BENMOHA, JACKY, currently active; US11449930B1 (“Method and apparatus for trading assets in different currencies”), assigned to BENMOHA, JACKY, currently active; US10062107B1 (“Consolidated trading platform”), assigned to INTERCURRENCY SOFTWARE LLC. The record also lists TradeSanta platforms and systems and https://tradesanta.com/.

How was case 2:24-cv-00390 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is dismissed without prejudice. The termination text reads: “Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (the “Notice”). (Dkt. No. 4.) In the Notice, Plaintiff voluntarily dismisses the above-captioned case against Defendant without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Id. at 1.) Defendant has not yet answered the Complaint or moved for summary judgment. (Id.) Having considered the Notice, the Court ACCEPTS AND ACKNOWLEDGES that all claims by Plaintiff against Defendant in the above-captioned case are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Each party is to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorney

What does dismissal without prejudice mean?

A dismissal without prejudice ends this action but leaves the claims alive — the plaintiff may file them again later, subject to the limitation period.

How long did case 2:24-cv-00390 take?

750 calendar days, from filing on 29 May 2024 to closure on 18 June 2026.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 2:24-cv-00390?

Chief Judge Rodney Gilstrap presided. Christopher A. Honea is recorded as counsel for plaintiff Intercurrency Software.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 2:24-cv-00390 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 2:24-cv-00390 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.