Interface IP Holdings, LLC v. Latam Airlines Group, SA
Infringement action filed 8 May 2023 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and closed 9 Aug 2023, with 3 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: dismissed with prejudice.
Case record
- Patents involved
- US7080325B2US7500201B2US7406663B2
- Case no.
- 2:23-cv-00200
- Verdict cause
- Infringement action
- Court
- E.D. Tex.
- Court level
- District Court
- Case region
- Texas
- Chief judge
- Rodney Gilstrap
- Trial level
- First instance
- Filed – Closed
- 8 May 2023 – 9 Aug 2023
- Duration
- 93 days
- Basis of termination
- Dismissed with Prejudice
- Products & marks
- Data input method and system with multi-sub-field matching of user entries into a graphical input device · Graphical device for comprehensive viewing and input of variable data via a browser-based display · Graphical input device with dynamic field width adjustment for input of variable data via a browser-based display
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
Get an FTO claim chart- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
Graphical device for comprehensive viewing and input of variable data via a browser-based display
A graphical input device, preferably in a browser-based display, resembles a pull-down menu, with a displayed data entry field. The set of possible entries to be displayed along with the graphical input device varies depending on the user. The minimum display width needed for full-width display of the entries is evaluated by scripting and the actual display of the set is generated accordingly. The drop-down list and its listed entries may be wider than the data entry field. The user can thus view and select customized possible entries that cannot fit within the displayed data entry field. According to another aspect of the preferred embodiment of the invention, when the user is making selections from the drop-down list, multiple keyboard entries can be used to cause rapid scrolling to entries that match not only the first character entered, but also to entries whose first n characters match n characters entered while viewing the list. For hierarchically structured and itemized entry lists, matching is preferably performed first to the right of at least one delimiter. The various novel aspects of the invention are implemented using scripting embedded within HTML code so that they are available to users who are browsing web content.
- Legal status
- Inactive
- Granted
- 18 Jul 2006
- Est. expiry
- 21 Apr 2023
- Validity challenges
- None recorded
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- TREIBACH-HECK, VARDA · CALDWELL, BYRON G. · JOHNSON, BRUCE
- Classification
- G06F3/00G06F3/033G06F3/048
- Prosecution counsel
- Heck Family Trust
- Examiner
- HUYNH, BA
Data input method and system with multi-sub-field matching of user entries into a graphical input device
A current set of user-selectable choices is associated with a displayed graphical input device, which is used to select a value of an input parameter. Each user-selectable choice has at least one pair of information fields separated by a delimiter and each information field comprises sequentially ordered characters. A search for a matching entry to assign to the input parameter is carried out as the user enters each of a sequence of characters, and if a match is not found in a first information field, then (or simultaneously) it is sought in a different information field, also on the basis of the character-by-character user entries.
- Legal status
- Inactive
- Granted
- 3 Mar 2009
- Est. expiry
- 22 Feb 2022
- Validity challenges
- None recorded
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- TREIBACH-HECK, VARDA · CALDWELL, BYRON G. · JOHNSON, BRUCE
- Classification
- G06F3/048G06F3/00G06F3/033
- Examiner
- THERIAULT, STEVEN B
Also asserted in this case
1 moreThe docket lists 3 asserted patents. Full bibliographic detail, drawings and prosecution history for the remaining asserted patent are one query away in Eureka.
Parties of record
Interface IP Holdings, LLC
- Core tech
- G06F3/00G06F3/033G06F3/048
- Counsel
- Bradford J. Black · Eric Hugh Findlay
- Firm
- Bradford Black PC, Findlay Craft PC
Latam Airlines Group, SA
- Core tech
- Not recorded
- Counsel
- Not recorded
- Firm
- Not recorded
Counsel of record
| Attorney | For | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford J. Black | Interface IP Holdings, LLC | Plaintiff |
| Eric Hugh Findlay | Interface IP Holdings, LLC | Plaintiff |
Basis of termination
From the record · verbatim“Having considered the Notice, the Court ACCEPTS AND ACKNOWLEDGES that all claims and causes of action asserted by Plaintiff against Defendant in the above-captioned case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”
Case 2:23-cv-00200 · E.D. Tex. · closed 9 August 2023
Related cases
Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.
Frequently asked questions
What is case 2:23-cv-00200?
2:23-cv-00200 is a patent infringement action brought by Interface IP Holdings, LLC against Latam Airlines Group, SA, filed on 8 May 2023 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The case closed on 9 August 2023.
Which patents were asserted in 2:23-cv-00200?
US7080325B2 (“Graphical device for comprehensive viewing and input of variable data via a browser-based display”), assigned to INTERFACE IP HOLDINGS LLC, currently inactive; US7500201B2 (“Data input method and system with multi-sub-field matching of user entries into a graphical input device”), assigned to INTERFACE IP HOLDINGS LLC, currently inactive; US7406663B2 (“Graphical input device with dynamic field width adjustment for input of variable data via a browser-based display”), assigned to INTERFACE IP HOLDINGS LLC. The record also lists Data input method and system with multi-sub-field matching of user entries into a graphical input device, Graphical device for comprehensive viewing and input of variable data via a browser-based display and Graphical input device with dynamic field width adjustment for input of variable data via a browser-based display.
How was case 2:23-cv-00200 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is dismissed with prejudice. The termination text reads: “Having considered the Notice, the Court ACCEPTS AND ACKNOWLEDGES that all claims and causes of action asserted by Plaintiff against Defendant in the above-captioned case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”
What does dismissal with prejudice mean?
A dismissal with prejudice permanently ends the claims that were filed, so the same claims cannot be brought again against that defendant. It is the usual form when the parties have settled.
How long did case 2:23-cv-00200 take?
93 calendar days, from filing on 8 May 2023 to closure on 9 August 2023.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 2:23-cv-00200?
Chief Judge Rodney Gilstrap presided. Bradford J. Black and Eric Hugh Findlay are recorded as counsel for plaintiff Interface IP.
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 2:23-cv-00200 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.