Lifetime Products, Inc. v. Iceberg Enterprises LLC
Infringement action filed 23 Jun 2025 in the United States District Court for the District of Utah and closed 9 Jun 2026, with US8622007B2 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: voluntary dismissal.
Case record
- Patent involved
- US8622007B2
- Application no.
- US13/455073
- Case no.
- 1:25-cv-00087
- Verdict cause
- Infringement action
- Court
- D. Utah
- Court level
- District Court
- Case region
- Utah
- Chief judge
- Dale A. Kimball
- Trial level
- First instance
- Filed – Closed
- 23 Jun 2025 – 9 Jun 2026
- Duration
- 351 days
- Basis of termination
- Voluntary dismissal
- Products & marks
- Table with molded plastic table top
- Validity challenges
- None recorded
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
Get an FTO claim chart- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
Table with molded plastic table top
A table may include a molded plastic table top with an upper surface, a lower surface and a hollow interior portion disposed between the upper surface and the lower surface. The upper surface, lower surface and hollow interior portion of the table top may be integrally formed during the molding process as part of a unitary, one-piece construction. The table may also include a side rail of a frame connected to the lower surface of the table top and a plurality of depressions disposed between the side rail and the upper surface of the table top. The plurality of depressions may be integrally formed in the lower surface of the table top during the molding process as part of the unitary, one-piece construction. The plurality of depressions may be sized and configured to support the portion of the table top disposed above the side rail of the frame.
- Legal status
- Active
- Granted
- 7 Jan 2014
- Earliest priority
- 25 Apr 2011
- Est. expiry
- 25 Apr 2031
- Validity challenges
- None recorded
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- PEERY, WENDELL · JIN, JU-YOUNG · JOHNSON, MITCH
- Classification
- A47B3/00
- Prosecution counsel
- Maschoff Brennan
- Examiner
- ING, MATTHEW
Parties of record
Lifetime Products, Inc.
- Core tech
- A47B3/00
- Counsel
- Kirk R. Harris · Sterling Arthur Brennan
- Firm
- Maschoff Brennan Gilmore Israelsen & Mauriel
Iceberg Enterprises LLC
- Core tech
- Not recorded
- Counsel
- Charles L. Riddle
- Firm
- Wasatch IP
Counsel of record
| Attorney | For | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Kirk R. Harris | Lifetime Products, Inc. | Plaintiff |
| Sterling Arthur Brennan | Lifetime Products, Inc. | Plaintiff |
| Charles L. Riddle | Iceberg Enterprises LLC | Defendant |
Basis of termination
From the record · verbatim“Plaintiff Lifetime Products, Inc. hereby files this Notice of Voluntary Dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). According to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or motion for summary judgment. Defendant has not filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, Lifetime Products, Inc. voluntarily dismisses this action against Defendant Iceberg Enterprises, LLC with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) with the parties to bear their own fees and costs.”
Case 1:25-cv-00087 · D. Utah · closed 9 June 2026
Related cases
Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.
Frequently asked questions
What is case 1:25-cv-00087?
1:25-cv-00087 is a patent infringement action brought by Lifetime Products, Inc. against Iceberg Enterprises LLC, filed on 23 Jun 2025 in the United States District Court for the District of Utah. The case closed on 9 June 2026.
Which patent was asserted in 1:25-cv-00087?
US8622007B2 (“Table with molded plastic table top”), assigned to LIFETIME PRODUCTS, INC., currently active. The record also lists Table with molded plastic table top.
How was case 1:25-cv-00087 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is voluntary dismissal. The termination text reads: “Plaintiff Lifetime Products, Inc. hereby files this Notice of Voluntary Dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). According to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or motion for summary judgment. Defendant has not filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, Lifetime Products, Inc. voluntarily dismisses this action against Defendant Iceberg Enterprises, LLC with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) with the parties to be
What does dismissal with prejudice mean?
A dismissal with prejudice permanently ends the claims that were filed, so the same claims cannot be brought again against that defendant. It is the usual form when the parties have settled.
How long did case 1:25-cv-00087 take?
351 calendar days, from filing on 23 Jun 2025 to closure on 9 June 2026.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 1:25-cv-00087?
Chief Judge Dale A. Kimball presided. Kirk R. Harris and Sterling Arthur Brennan are recorded as counsel for plaintiff Lifetime Products. Charles L. Riddle appears for defendant Iceberg Enterprises.
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 1:25-cv-00087 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.