Lifted Limited v. Novelty Inc. & Walmart: Design Patent Dispute Ends in Stipulated Dismissal
What would you like to do next?
Choose your path based on your current needs:
📋 Case Summary
| Case Name | Lifted Limited, LLC v. Novelty, Inc. and Walmart, Inc. |
| Case Number | 1:16-cv-03135 (D. Colo.) |
| Court | U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Duration | Dec 2016 – Apr 2024 7 years 3 months |
| Outcome | Resolved — Stipulated Dismissal |
| Patents at Issue | |
| Accused Products | Smoking accessory devices embodying the protected ornamental design |
Case Overview
After more than seven years of litigation in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Lifted Limited, LLC v. Novelty, Inc. and Walmart, Inc. (Case No. 1:16-cv-03135) concluded not with a jury verdict or judicial ruling on the merits, but with a stipulated dismissal with prejudice — a resolution that closed all claims, counterclaims, and defenses between the parties permanently.
At the center of this design patent infringement dispute was U.S. Design Patent No. USD662,655S — protecting the ornamental design of the Flagship Toker Poker® Smoking Tool, a multi-function smoking accessory device manufactured and marketed by plaintiff Lifted Limited, LLC. The defendants, specialty retailer Novelty, Inc. and retail giant Walmart, Inc., faced allegations that competing products infringed that registered design.
For IP professionals, R&D teams, and patent litigators, this case offers instructive insights into the lifecycle of design patent assertions, the strategic dynamics of pursuing retail distribution chains, and how prolonged litigation ultimately gives way to negotiated resolution.
The Parties
⚖️ Plaintiff
Owner and commercializer of the Toker Poker® brand of multi-function smoking tool accessories, with meaningful retail penetration in the smoking accessories market.
🛡️ Defendant
Novelty, Inc. is a specialty wholesale/retail distributor. Walmart, Inc. is a global retail corporation. Both faced allegations of infringing products.
The Patent at Issue
This dispute centered on a single design patent protecting the ornamental appearance of a popular smoking accessory. Design patents are registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and protect ornamental appearance rather than functional technology.
- • US D662,655S — Ornamental design of the Flagship Toker Poker® Smoking Tool
Designing a similar product?
Check if your product’s design might infringe this or related patents before launch.
The Verdict & Legal Analysis
Outcome
On April 1, 2024, Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer entered an order acknowledging the Stipulated Dismissal with Prejudice (Docket No. 324), filed jointly by all appearing parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The dismissal encompassed “all claims, counterclaims, and defenses that have been or could have been asserted by and between the Parties.” No damages award, injunctive relief, or public judicial ruling on validity or infringement was issued.
Key Legal Issues
The case, designated as an infringement action, involved design patent protection. Design patent litigation under 35 U.S.C. § 289 carries distinctive features, including total profits disgorgement as a potential remedy. Infringement is assessed through the “ordinary observer test” (Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc., Fed. Cir. 2008), which is notably favorable to plaintiffs compared to utility patent claim construction. The involvement of Walmart as a downstream retailer likely created significant settlement pressure due to brand risk and operational disruption concerns.
Freedom to Operate (FTO) Analysis
This case highlights critical IP risks in consumer product design. Choose your next step:
📋 Understand This Case’s Impact
Learn about the specific risks and implications from this litigation.
- View the related patent in this technology space
- See which companies are most active in design patents
- Understand claim construction patterns
🔍 Check My Product’s Risk
Run a comprehensive FTO analysis for your own technology or product.
- Input your product description or technical features
- AI identifies potentially blocking patents
- Get actionable risk assessment report
High Risk Area
Smoking accessory device designs
1 Related Patent
In smoking accessory design space
Design-Around Options
Available for most claims
✅ Key Takeaways
Stipulated dismissals with prejudice after extensive docket activity typically reflect undisclosed settlement terms — monitor related licensing activity in the market.
Search related case law →Design patent infringement claims against retail chains carry distinct settlement leverage due to brand risk and supply chain disruption concerns.
Explore precedents →The Egyptian Goddess ordinary observer standard remains the operative infringement test — case strategy should be structured accordingly.
Learn more about this standard →Document design evolution thoroughly and conduct FTO analysis before finalising product aesthetics.
Start FTO analysis for my product →Consider filing design patents early in the product development cycle to protect your own aesthetic innovations.
Try AI patent drafting →Frequently Asked Questions
U.S. Design Patent No. USD662,655S (Application No. US29/413,681), protecting the ornamental design of the Flagship Toker Poker® Smoking Tool.
The case was resolved through a Stipulated Dismissal with Prejudice (Docket No. 324) entered April 1, 2024, under FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with no public damages award or merits ruling.
Naming major retail defendants creates significant settlement leverage — retailers face brand reputational risk, supply chain disruption, and operational costs that often make resolution preferable to prolonged litigation.
Ready to Strengthen Your Patent Strategy?
Join 18,000+ IP professionals using PatSnap Eureka to conduct prior art searches, draft patents, and analyse competitive landscapes with AI-powered precision.
PatSnap IP Intelligence Team
Patent Research & Competitive Intelligence · PatSnap
This analysis was produced by the PatSnap IP Intelligence Team — a group of patent analysts, IP strategists, and data scientists who work daily with PatSnap’s global patent database of over 2 billion structured data points across patents, litigation records, scientific literature, and regulatory filings.
The team specialises in tracking landmark litigation outcomes, translating complex court rulings into actionable IP strategy, and identifying the competitive intelligence implications for R&D and legal teams. All case analysis is grounded in primary sources: official court records, USPTO filings, and Federal Circuit opinions.
References
- PACER — Case No. 1:16-cv-03135, D. Colo.
- USPTO Patent Center — USD662,655S
- Justia Law — Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc., 543 F.3d 665 (Fed. Cir. 2008)
- Cornell Legal Information Institute — 35 U.S.C. § 289
- PatSnap — IP Intelligence Solutions for Law Firms
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. All case information is drawn from publicly available court records. For platform capabilities, visit PatSnap.
📑 Table of Contents
🚀 PatSnap Eureka IP Tools
🔍Novelty Search
Find prior art instantly
Patent Drafting
AI-assisted claim writing
FTO Analysis
Assess infringement risk
Concerned About Your Product?
Don’t wait for litigation. Check your product’s freedom to operate now with AI-powered analysis.
Run FTO for My Product