LithiumHub v. Bass Pro: ITC Battery Patent Case Settles
What would you like to do next?
Choose your path based on your current needs:
📋 Case Summary
| Case Name | LithiumHub, LLC v. Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLC |
| Case Number | 337-TA-1421 |
| Court | U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) |
| Duration | Sep 2024 – Jan 2026 1 year 4 months |
| Outcome | Settlement — No Exclusion Order |
| Patents at Issue | |
| Accused Products | Lithium Batteries with Solid-State Switches |
Case Overview
The Parties
⚖️ Complainant
A patent-holding entity asserting rights over lithium battery innovations featuring solid-state switch architecture.
🛡️ Respondent
One of the largest outdoor sporting goods retailers in the U.S., operating Bass Pro Shops and Cabela’s retail brands.
Patents at Issue
This case centered on two U.S. patents covering lithium battery technology incorporating solid-state switching mechanisms. Both patents address the replacement of traditional electromechanical relays with solid-state switches in lithium battery systems.
- • U.S. Patent No. 9,954,207 B2 — Lithium battery incorporating a solid-state switch.
- • U.S. Patent No. 9,412,994 B2 — Lithium starter battery and a solid-state switch therefor.
Developing a new battery product?
Check if your lithium battery design might infringe these or related patents before launch.
The Verdict & Legal Analysis
Outcome
ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-1421 was terminated by settlement between LithiumHub, LLC and Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLC. No public damages award was issued, consistent with ITC proceedings which provide injunctive-style import exclusion relief. No exclusion order or cease-and-desist order was entered against Bass Pro.
Key Legal Issues
The infringement action was grounded in alleged violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. LithiumHub’s strategy of targeting a major retailer distributing accused lithium battery products is a well-established ITC tactic designed to disrupt supply chains and create settlement urgency. While the settlement forecloses a precedential ruling, the patents’ subject matter—solid-state switching integrated within lithium battery systems—represents a claim scope that would likely have implicated technical distinctions between switching components.
Freedom to Operate (FTO) Analysis
This case highlights critical IP risks in lithium battery design. Choose your next step:
📋 Understand This Case’s Impact
Learn about the specific risks and implications from this litigation in battery tech.
- View all related patents in solid-state switching
- See which companies are most active in battery IP
- Understand claim construction patterns for integrated systems
🔍 Check My Product’s Risk
Run a comprehensive FTO analysis for your own lithium battery technology.
- Input your product description or technical features
- AI identifies potentially blocking patents (e.g., solid-state switches)
- Get actionable risk assessment report
High Risk Area
Solid-state switch integration in lithium batteries
2 Patents at Issue
In this specific case
Design-Around Options
Available in switch topology or BMS
✅ Key Takeaways
ITC Section 337 remains a powerful forum for lithium battery patent enforcement, offering fast timelines and import exclusion leverage.
Search related ITC cases →Targeting downstream retailers amplifies settlement pressure without requiring identification of all upstream manufacturers.
Explore legal strategies →Settlement before Initial Determination preserves patent validity from public challenge—a strategic advantage for future assertion campaigns.
Analyze litigation outcomes →Frequently Asked Questions
The investigation involved U.S. Patent No. 9,954,207 B2 (lithium battery with solid-state switch) and U.S. Patent No. 9,412,994 B2 (lithium starter battery and solid-state switch), both covering solid-state switching integrated in lithium battery systems.
The case was terminated by settlement on January 29, 2026, 504 days after filing, without a public merits ruling or Commission exclusion order.
The settlement preserves LithiumHub’s patent claims without public validity challenge, signaling continued enforcement risk for companies selling lithium batteries with solid-state switch features in U.S. markets.
Ready to Strengthen Your Patent Strategy?
Join 18,000+ IP professionals using PatSnap Eureka to conduct prior art searches, draft patents, and analyse competitive landscapes with AI-powered precision.
References
- USITC Active Investigations Database — Case 337-TA-1421
- U.S. Patent No. 9,954,207 B2
- U.S. Patent No. 9,412,994 B2
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office — Patent Center
- PatSnap — IP Intelligence Solutions for Law Firms
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. All case information is drawn from publicly available court records. For platform capabilities, visit PatSnap.