Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
Lyne Laboratories v. Home Depot | Patent Lawsuit 23-1672

Lyne Laboratories, Inc. v. Home Depot, Inc.

23-1672 Fed. Cir. Closed US10349479B2
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 29 Mar 2023 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and closed 31 May 2023, with US10349479B2 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: case dismissed.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Patent involved
US10349479B2
Application no.
US15/369218
Case no.
23-1672
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
Fed. Cir.
Court level
Court of Appeals
Case region
District of Columbia
Chief judge
None recorded
Trial level
Appeal
Filed – Closed
29 Mar 2023 – 31 May 2023
Duration
63 days
Basis of termination
Case Dismissed
Products & marks
Color temperature controlled and low THD LED lighting devices and systems and methods of driving the same
Validity challenges
2 on record
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 23-1672, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US10349479B2 Active App. US15/369218

Color temperature controlled and low THD LED lighting devices and systems and methods of driving the same

The purposes of the devices described herein are to provide an LED lighting device capable of efficiently and economically emitting light having a selectable color temperature or a warm-on-dim feature when driven with AC power and to provide LED lighting devices which have an improved power factor and a reduced total harmonic distortion when powered with AC power.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Active
Granted
9 Jul 2019
Earliest priority
3 Dec 2012
Est. expiry
20 Aug 2032
Validity challenges
2 on recordIPR2021-01370 · Patentability · filed by Home Depot USA, Inc.IPR2021-01370 · Patentability · filed by HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
H05B33/08H05B44/00
Prosecution counsel
K&L Gates LLP
Examiner
LE, DON P
US10349479B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US10349479B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2
Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Counsel of record

Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that: (1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. P. 42 (b).(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.”

Case 23-1672 · Fed. Cir. · closed 31 May 2023
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 23-1672?

23-1672 is a patent infringement action brought by Lyne Laboratories, Inc. against Home Depot, Inc., filed on 29 Mar 2023 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The case closed on 31 May 2023.

Which patent was asserted in 23-1672?

US10349479B2 (“Color temperature controlled and low THD LED lighting devices and systems and methods of driving the same”), assigned to LYNK LABS, INC., currently active. The record also lists Color temperature controlled and low THD LED lighting devices and systems and methods of driving the same.

How was case 23-1672 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is case dismissed. The termination text reads: “The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that: (1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. P. 42 (b).(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.”

How long did case 23-1672 take?

63 calendar days, from filing on 29 Mar 2023 to closure on 31 May 2023.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 23-1672?

James Carmichael, Minghui Yang, Stephen McBride and Stephen Terry Schreiner are recorded as counsel for plaintiff Lyne Laboratories. Brian K. Erickson, Jennifer Librach Nall and Stanley Joseph Panikowski III appear for defendant Home Depot.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 23-1672 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 23-1672 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.