McOm IP, LLC v. Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.
Infringement action filed 6 Apr 2023 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas and closed 30 May 2023, with US8862508B2 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: voluntary dismissal.
Case record
- Patent involved
- US8862508B2
- Application no.
- US11/559894
- Case no.
- 6:23-cv-00253
- Verdict cause
- Infringement action
- Court
- W.D. Tex.
- Court level
- District Court
- Case region
- Texas
- Chief judge
- None recorded
- Trial level
- First instance
- Filed – Closed
- 6 Apr 2023 – 30 May 2023
- Duration
- 54 days
- Basis of termination
- Voluntary dismissal
- Products & marks
- System and method for unifying e-banking touch points and providing personalized financial services
- Validity challenges
- 1 on record
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
Get an FTO claim chart- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
System and method for unifying e-banking touch points and providing personalized financial services
A system and method for delivering a retail banking multi-channel solution that unifies interactive electronic banking touch points to provide personalized financial services to customers and a common point of control for financial institutions is provided.
- Legal status
- Active
- Granted
- 14 Oct 2014
- Earliest priority
- 14 Nov 2005
- Est. expiry
- 2 Aug 2028
- Validity challenges
- 1 on recordIPR2022-00055 · Patentability · filed by Unified Patents, LLC
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- MAIORINO, THOMAS · TAYLOR, DANIEL
- Classification
- G06Q40/00
- Examiner
- SHAIKH, MOHAMMAD Z
Parties of record
McOm IP, LLC
- Core tech
- G06Q40/00
- Counsel
- Jeffrey Eugene Kubiak · William P. Ramey III
- Firm
- Ramey LLP
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.
- Core tech
- Not recorded
- Counsel
- Kelly Ransom
- Firm
- Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP
Counsel of record
| Attorney | For | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Eugene Kubiak | McOm IP, LLC | Plaintiff |
| William P. Ramey III | McOm IP, LLC | Plaintiff |
| Kelly Ransom | Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. | Defendant |
Basis of termination
From the record · verbatim“Pursuant to Federal Rule 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii), the Plaintiff, mCom IP, LLC hereby files this notice of dismissal of this action for all of Plaintiff’s claims as Defendant has not answered or filed a motion for summary judgment. The dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims shall be WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to the asserted patent and each party shall bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees.”
Case 6:23-cv-00253 · W.D. Tex. · closed 30 May 2023
Related cases
Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.
Frequently asked questions
What is case 6:23-cv-00253?
6:23-cv-00253 is a patent infringement action brought by McOm IP, LLC against Prosperity Bancshares, Inc., filed on 6 Apr 2023 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. The case closed on 30 May 2023.
Which patent was asserted in 6:23-cv-00253?
US8862508B2 (“System and method for unifying e-banking touch points and providing personalized financial services”), assigned to MCOM IP, LLC, currently active. The record also lists System and method for unifying e-banking touch points and providing personalized financial services.
How was case 6:23-cv-00253 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is voluntary dismissal. The termination text reads: “Pursuant to Federal Rule 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii), the Plaintiff, mCom IP, LLC hereby files this notice of dismissal of this action for all of Plaintiff’s claims as Defendant has not answered or filed a motion for summary judgment. The dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims shall be WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to the asserted patent and each party shall bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees.”
What does dismissal without prejudice mean?
A dismissal without prejudice ends this action but leaves the claims alive — the plaintiff may file them again later, subject to the limitation period.
How long did case 6:23-cv-00253 take?
54 calendar days, from filing on 6 Apr 2023 to closure on 30 May 2023.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 6:23-cv-00253?
Jeffrey Eugene Kubiak and William P. Ramey III are recorded as counsel for plaintiff McOm IP. Kelly Ransom appears for defendant Prosperity Bancshares.
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 6:23-cv-00253 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.