McOm IP, LLC v. Webster Financial Corporation
Infringement action filed 5 Oct 2023 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and closed 25 Oct 2023, with US8862508B2 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: voluntary dismissal.
Case record
- Patent involved
- US8862508B2
- Application no.
- US11/559894
- Case no.
- 1:23-cv-08772
- Verdict cause
- Infringement action
- Court
- S.D.N.Y.
- Court level
- District Court
- Case region
- New York
- Chief judge
- Mary Kay Vyskocil
- Trial level
- First instance
- Filed – Closed
- 5 Oct 2023 – 25 Oct 2023
- Duration
- 20 days
- Basis of termination
- Voluntary dismissal
- Products & marks
- System and method for unifying e-banking touch points and providing personalized financial services
- Validity challenges
- 1 on record
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
Get an FTO claim chart- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
System and method for unifying e-banking touch points and providing personalized financial services
A system and method for delivering a retail banking multi-channel solution that unifies interactive electronic banking touch points to provide personalized financial services to customers and a common point of control for financial institutions is provided.
- Legal status
- Active
- Granted
- 14 Oct 2014
- Earliest priority
- 14 Nov 2005
- Est. expiry
- 2 Aug 2028
- Validity challenges
- 1 on recordIPR2022-00055 · Patentability · filed by Unified Patents, LLC
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- MAIORINO, THOMAS · TAYLOR, DANIEL
- Classification
- G06Q40/00
- Examiner
- SHAIKH, MOHAMMAD Z
Parties of record
McOm IP, LLC
- Core tech
- G06Q40/00
- Counsel
- David John Hoffman
- Firm
- Law Office David J. Hoffman
Webster Financial Corporation
- Core tech
- Not recorded
- Counsel
- Not recorded
- Firm
- Not recorded
Counsel of record
| Attorney | For | Role |
|---|---|---|
| David John Hoffman | McOm IP, LLC | Plaintiff |
Basis of termination
From the record · verbatim“Pursuant to FederalRule 41 (a)(1)(A)(i), the Plaintiff, mComIP, LLC, files this notice of voluntary dismissal ofthisaction forall ofPlaintiff’sclaimsas defendant has notanswered or filed a motion for summary judgment. The dismissal ofPlaintiff’sclaims shall be WITHPREJUDICE as to theasserted patent. Each party shall bear its own costs,expensesand attorneys’ fees. Granted. SO ORDERED”
Case 1:23-cv-08772 · S.D.N.Y. · closed 25 October 2023
Related cases
Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.
Frequently asked questions
What is case 1:23-cv-08772?
1:23-cv-08772 is a patent infringement action brought by McOm IP, LLC against Webster Financial Corporation, filed on 5 Oct 2023 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The case closed on 25 October 2023.
Which patent was asserted in 1:23-cv-08772?
US8862508B2 (“System and method for unifying e-banking touch points and providing personalized financial services”), assigned to MCOM IP, LLC, currently active. The record also lists System and method for unifying e-banking touch points and providing personalized financial services.
How was case 1:23-cv-08772 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is voluntary dismissal. The termination text reads: “Pursuant to FederalRule 41 (a)(1)(A)(i), the Plaintiff, mComIP, LLC, files this notice of voluntary dismissal ofthisaction forall ofPlaintiff’sclaimsas defendant has notanswered or filed a motion for summary judgment. The dismissal ofPlaintiff’sclaims shall be WITHPREJUDICE as to theasserted patent. Each party shall bear its own costs,expensesand attorneys’ fees. Granted. SO ORDERED”
What does voluntary dismissal mean?
A voluntary dismissal is one the plaintiff asks for rather than one the court imposes. Where both sides stipulate to it, it commonly signals a settlement that is not filed on the public docket.
How long did case 1:23-cv-08772 take?
20 calendar days, from filing on 5 Oct 2023 to closure on 25 October 2023.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 1:23-cv-08772?
Chief Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil presided. David John Hoffman is recorded as counsel for plaintiff McOm IP.
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 1:23-cv-08772 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.