Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
McWane et al. v. Locket IP | Patent Lawsuit 2:23-cv-00265

McWane, Inc. et al. v. Locket IP, LLC

2:23-cv-00265 N.D. Ala. Closed US10514832B2
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 2 Mar 2023 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama and closed 2 May 2023, with US10514832B2 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: voluntary dismissal.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Patent involved
US10514832B2
Application no.
US15/971020
Case no.
2:23-cv-00265
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
N.D. Ala.
Court level
District Court
Case region
Alabama
Chief judge
Nicholas A Danella
Trial level
First instance
Filed – Closed
2 Mar 2023 – 2 May 2023
Duration
61 days
Basis of termination
Voluntary dismissal
Products & marks
Method for locating regions of interest in a user interface
Validity challenges
None recorded
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 2:23-cv-00265, United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US10514832B2 Inactive App. US15/971020

Method for locating regions of interest in a user interface

The present disclosure is directed towards having a user interface that displays a number of cards or windows. A user can implement a command where the user interface will automatically change the position of the displayed cards to show regions of interest which are the parts of the cards that a user may have interested in. The user interest can be determined in accordance with user preference information. Optionally, cards which do not have regions of interest are removed from a display area and such cards are replaced with new cards that do have regions of interest.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Inactive
Granted
24 Dec 2019
Earliest priority
20 Dec 2011
Est. expiry
6 Feb 2032
Validity challenges
None recorded
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
G06F3/048G11B27/034G06F3/0482G06F3/0485G06F16/44G06F3/0484G11B27/10G06F3/0488G06F16/438
Examiner
LU, HUA
US10514832B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US10514832B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2
Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Counsel of record

AttorneyForRole
James Conrad LesterMcWane, Inc.Plaintiff
Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiffs McWane, Inc. and McWane Plant and Industrial, LLC (“Plaintiffs”) hereby give notice of the voluntary dismissal of this action without prejudice. Defendant Locket IP LLC has not filed an answer to Plaintiffs’ Complaint, Doc. No. 1.”

Case 2:23-cv-00265 · N.D. Ala. · closed 2 May 2023
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 2:23-cv-00265?

2:23-cv-00265 is a patent infringement action brought by McWane, Inc. against Locket IP, LLC, filed on 2 Mar 2023 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. The case closed on 2 May 2023.

Which patent was asserted in 2:23-cv-00265?

US10514832B2 (“Method for locating regions of interest in a user interface”), assigned to LOCKET IP LLC, currently inactive. The record also lists Method for locating regions of interest in a user interface.

How was case 2:23-cv-00265 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is voluntary dismissal. The termination text reads: “Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiffs McWane, Inc. and McWane Plant and Industrial, LLC (“Plaintiffs”) hereby give notice of the voluntary dismissal of this action without prejudice. Defendant Locket IP LLC has not filed an answer to Plaintiffs’ Complaint, Doc. No. 1.”

What does dismissal without prejudice mean?

A dismissal without prejudice ends this action but leaves the claims alive — the plaintiff may file them again later, subject to the limitation period.

How long did case 2:23-cv-00265 take?

61 calendar days, from filing on 2 Mar 2023 to closure on 2 May 2023.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 2:23-cv-00265?

Chief Judge Nicholas A Danella presided. James Conrad Lester is recorded as counsel for plaintiff McWane.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 2:23-cv-00265 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 2:23-cv-00265 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.