Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
Metrom Rail v. Siemens Mobility et al. | Patent Lawsuit 24-2236

Metrom Rail, LLC v. Siemens Mobility, Inc. et al.

24-2236 Fed. Cir. Closed US8812227B2
Get a prior-art report

Patentability filed 19 Aug 2024 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and closed 11 May 2026, with US8812227B2 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: appeal dismissed in part.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Patent involved
US8812227B2
Application no.
US13/474428
Case no.
24-2236
Verdict cause
Patentability
Court
Fed. Cir.
Court level
Court of Appeals
Case region
District of Columbia
Chief judge
None recorded
Trial level
Appeal
Filed – Closed
19 Aug 2024 – 11 May 2026
Duration
630 days
Basis of termination
Appeal Dismissed in Part
Products & marks
Collision avoidance system for rail line vehicles
Validity challenges
1 on record
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 24-2236, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US8812227B2 Active App. US13/474428

Collision avoidance system for rail line vehicles

A collision avoidance system (CAS) is described that includes one or more sensor technologies, including, for example, an Ultra Wideband (UWB) sensing technology. The collision avoidance system is designed to reliably track the location and speed of vehicles and the distance between vehicles over a wide variety of track and terrain. The collision avoidance system may utilize information from a variety of sensor technologies to determine whether one or more vehicles violate speed and/or separation criteria, and may generate a warning.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Active
Granted
19 Aug 2014
Earliest priority
14 Feb 2012
Est. expiry
17 May 2032
Validity challenges
1 on recordIPR2023-00470 · Patentability · filed by SIEMENS MOBILITY, INC
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
G05D1/02B61L15/00B61L23/06B61L23/34B61L25/02G06F17/10G06G7/78G08G1/16
Prosecution counsel
MCANDREWS HELD & MALLOY, LTD
Examiner
BLACK, THOMAS
US8812227B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US8812227B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2
Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Counsel of record

Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“THIS CAUSE having been considered, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED-IN-PART AND REVERSED-IN-PART”

Case 24-2236 · Fed. Cir. · closed 11 May 2026
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 24-2236?

24-2236 is a patent patentability brought by Metrom Rail, LLC against Siemens Mobility, Inc., filed on 19 Aug 2024 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The case closed on 11 May 2026.

Which patent was asserted in 24-2236?

US8812227B2 (“Collision avoidance system for rail line vehicles”), assigned to METROM RAIL, LLC, currently active. The record also lists Collision avoidance system for rail line vehicles.

How was case 24-2236 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is appeal dismissed in part. The termination text reads: “THIS CAUSE having been considered, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED-IN-PART AND REVERSED-IN-PART”

How long did case 24-2236 take?

630 calendar days, from filing on 19 Aug 2024 to closure on 11 May 2026.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 24-2236?

Gregory Schodde, Philipp Ruben and Rajendra A. Chiplunkar are recorded as counsel for plaintiff Metrom Rail. Ali Hossein Khan Tehrani, Joshua James and Mark Michael Supko appear for defendant Siemens Mobility.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 24-2236 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 24-2236 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.