“Pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and in accordance with the jury’s unanimous verdict and the entirety of the record, the Court hereby ORDERS and ENTERS JUDGMENT as follows: 1. Samsung has infringed all the Asserted Claims; 2. Samsung’s infringement of the Asserted Claims was willful; 3. The Asserted Claims are not invalid; 4. Mojo is hereby awarded damages from and against Samsung and shall accordingly have and recover from Samsung the sum of $192,136,029.00 U.S. Dollars as a lump sum reasonable royalty for Samsung’s infringement; 5. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d), Local Rule CV-54, and 28 U.S.C. § 1920, Mojo is the prevailing party in this case and shall recover its costs from Samsung. Mojo is directed to file its proposed Bill of Costs; 6. Notwithstanding the jury’s finding of willfulness, the Court having considered the totality of the circumstances together with the material benefit of having presided throughout the jury trial and having seen the same evidence and heard the same arguments as the jury, and mindful that enhancement is generally reserved for “egregious cases of culpable behavior,”1 concludes that enhancement of the compensatory award herein is not warranted under 35 U.S.C. § 284 and consequently, the court elects not to enhance the damages awarded herein;Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284 and Supreme Court guidance that “prejudgment interest shall ordinarily be awarded absent some justification for withholding such an award,”2 the Court awards to Mojo from Samsung pre-judgment interest applicable to all sums awarded herein, calculated at the 5-year U.S. Treasury Bill rate, compounded quarterly, from the date of infringement through the date of entry of this Judgment; 3 and 8. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961, the Court awards to Mojo from Samsung post-judgment interest applicable to all sums awarded herein, at the statutory rate, from the date of entry of this Judgment until paid. All other relief requested by either party which is now pending before the Court and not specifically awarded herein is DENIED.”