Nautilus v. Vevor Corp: Adjustable Dumbbell Patent Case Stayed After 364 Days
Fitness equipment maker Nautilus filed suit against Vevor Corporation and ten co-defendants in C.D. California, asserting three patents covering adjustable dumbbell technology. After 364 days of litigation, the court stayed all proceedings and removed the case from its active caseload pending a stipulation for dismissal or a new schedule.
Nautilus asserts three dumbbell patents against Vevor and Shanghai entities
Nautilus initiated this infringement action on June 22, 2022 in the Central District of California, asserting three U.S. patents — US10518123B2, US7614982B2, and US8002680B2 — against Vevor Corporation and a broad group of co-defendants including Vevor, Inc., Sanven Corporation, three Shanghai-based machinery and e-commerce entities, and two named individuals, Fuyu Jiao and Rubao Jiao. The accused products are adjustable dumbbell systems sold under the Vevor brand.
The recorded Basis of Termination is 'Case Stayed.' The docket order, dated June 14, 2023, states that the court, having considered the parties' Joint Stipulation to Stay Case, stayed all deadlines for thirty days up to and including July 14, 2023, removed the case from its active caseload, and ordered the parties to file a stipulation for dismissal or a new proposed schedule by that date.
See Complete Case & Patent Analysis →Filing to Case Stayed in 364 days
364 days from filing to stay — approximately one year of active litigation
US10518123B2, US7614982B2 & US8002680B2 — Adjustable Dumbbell Systems


Any company developing, importing, or selling adjustable dumbbell systems in the U.S. market should assess freedom-to-operate against all three Nautilus patents. This is particularly urgent for brands sourcing products from Chinese manufacturers, given that the defendant group in this case spans both U.S. distributors and Shanghai-based manufacturing and e-commerce entities. The risk profile is not limited to direct competitors — downstream distributors and platform sellers may also face exposure.
Official order — verbatim text
The court's order reflects a jointly requested administrative stay rather than a merits ruling. By removing the case from its active caseload and setting a 30-day deadline for dismissal or a new schedule, the order left the substantive infringement claims on all three patents unresolved as of the recorded stay date.
Full party and counsel information
| Role | Name | Type | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plaintiff | Nautilus | Individual | /Search in Eureka ↗ |
| Defendant | Vevor Corporation | Company | /Search in Eureka ↗ |
| Co-Defendant | Fuyu Jiao | Individual | Search in Eureka ↗ |
| Co-Defendant | Rubao Jiao | Individual | Search in Eureka ↗ |
| Co-Defendant | Shanghai Peixu Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd | Company | Search in Eureka ↗ |
| Co-Defendant | Shanghai Sihao Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd | Company | Search in Eureka ↗ |
| Co-Defendant | Shanghai Sishun E-Commerce Co., Ltd. | Company | Search in Eureka ↗ |
| Co-Defendant | Vevor, Inc. | Company | Search in Eureka ↗ |
| Co-Defendant | James Liu | Individual | Search in Eureka ↗ |
| Co-Defendant | Does | Individual | Search in Eureka ↗ |
| Co-Defendant | Shanghai Sishun Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. | Company | Search in Eureka ↗ |
| Co-Defendant | Sanven Corporation | Company | Search in Eureka ↗ |
| Plaintiff counsel | Karen Luong | Attorney | Counsel for NautilusSearch in Eureka ↗ |
| Plaintiff counsel | Paul L. Smelcer | Attorney | Counsel for NautilusSearch in Eureka ↗ |
| Plaintiff counsel | Rudolph A. Telscher , Jr. | Attorney | Counsel for NautilusSearch in Eureka ↗ |
| Plaintiff counsel | Samantha Sweet | Attorney | Counsel for NautilusSearch in Eureka ↗ |
| Plaintiff law firm | Husch Blackwell LLP | Law Firm | Representing NautilusSearch in Eureka ↗ |
| Presiding judge | Judge N/A | Judge | California Central District CourtSearch in Eureka ↗ |
R&D signals in the adjustable dumbbell and fitness equipment IP space
Forward-looking patent intelligence derived from Nautilus's three-patent assertion against Vevor and the broader adjustable fitness equipment technology landscape.
Nautilus's adjustable dumbbell patent filing activity
Nautilus has asserted three patents with different application numbers spanning multiple filing periods, suggesting a layered prosecution strategy in adjustable dumbbell mechanics. Monitoring Nautilus's broader portfolio — including continuations, divisionals, and recent applications — can reveal where the company is actively building new IP fences around this product category.
Portfolio depth watchFiling trends in adjustable weight selection mechanisms
The adjustable dumbbell category has attracted patent activity around selector mechanisms, weight plate retention, and cradle designs. Tracking global filing trends in this segment — including activity from both established fitness brands and Chinese OEM-linked applicants — can surface emerging design approaches and potential white-space opportunities for differentiation.
Adjustable dumbbell filing trendsVevor and Shanghai entities' patent activity in fitness equipment
Vevor Corporation and its affiliated Shanghai-based entities — including Peixu, Sihao, and Sishun — operate across manufacturing and e-commerce. Analysing any patent filings or design registrations held by these entities can indicate whether they are developing proprietary IP to defend future product lines or relying on design-around strategies in the adjustable fitness equipment space.
Vevor IP portfolio checkAdjacent innovation space near adjustable dumbbell IP
Nautilus's three asserted patents focus on mechanical adjustment and retention systems. Adjacent areas — including digital weight tracking, smart load sensing, connected fitness integration, and ergonomic handle design — may represent lower-encumbrance R&D territory for companies seeking to compete in the adjustable fitness equipment market without infringing the asserted portfolio.
Adjacent fitness IP white spaceSimilar patent cases in adjustable fitness equipment and consumer goods
Explore related infringement actions in the adjustable fitness equipment space filed in California federal courts, with comparable multi-defendant supply chain structures.
Related patent case — similar technology
Comparable case in the same technology domain. Patent holder and defendant reached resolution after proceedings.
SettledRelated infringement action — same court
Comparable Adjustable dumbbell system-adjacent infringement action. Patent enforcement dynamics analysed in depth.
Active · District CourtRelated invalidity challenge — appellate outcome
Combined invalidity and infringement action in the same technology space. Decided after substantive proceedings.
DecidedNautilus's broader IP enforcement history
Nautilus's full litigation history covering prior enforcement, licensing activity, and inter partes review proceedings.
Portfolio viewWhat this case signals for the fitness equipment IP landscape
A three-patent enforcement action against a multi-entity Chinese supply chain highlights evolving tactics in consumer fitness IP.
Multi-entity enforcement is now standard in consumer fitness IP disputes
Nautilus named ten defendants spanning U.S. distributors, Chinese manufacturers, e-commerce entities, and named individuals. This layered defendant strategy — targeting the full supply chain — suggests the plaintiff sought to close off multiple avenues of continued sales and distribution simultaneously.
Three-patent assertion increases claim breadth and settlement leverage
Asserting US10518123B2, US7614982B2, and US8002680B2 together across adjustable dumbbell system technology signals a portfolio enforcement approach. Competing product teams operating in the adjustable dumbbell space should evaluate all three patents when conducting freedom-to-operate analysis.
The stay and joint stipulation may signal private resolution negotiations
A joint stipulation to stay proceedings, filed after approximately one year of litigation and requiring parties to submit either a dismissal or new schedule, is consistent with parties pursuing a resolution outside the courtroom. However, the specific terms of any such resolution are not disclosed in the available record.
Nautilus's portfolio breadth creates ongoing exposure for adjustable dumbbell competitors
With three granted patents across different application dates, Nautilus's adjustable dumbbell IP stack covers a range of design and mechanical configurations. Entrants into this product category — particularly those sourcing from Chinese OEMs — should monitor Nautilus's broader portfolio for continuation and divisional filings.
Nautilus v Vevor — key questions answered
Nautilus asserted three patents: US10518123B2 (application US14/304853), US7614982B2 (application US11/844565), and US8002680B2 (application US12/882018). All three relate to adjustable dumbbell systems. The case was filed on June 22, 2022 in the Central District of California.
The court entered a stay on June 14, 2023 based on a Joint Stipulation to Stay Case filed by the parties. The order stayed all deadlines for 30 days to July 14, 2023, removed the case from the court's active caseload, and required the parties to file a stipulation for dismissal or a new proposed schedule by that date. The reasons underlying the parties' joint request are not disclosed in the available record.
The defendants include Vevor Corporation, Vevor, Inc., Sanven Corporation, Fuyu Jiao, Rubao Jiao, James Liu, Shanghai Peixu Machinery Equipment Co. Ltd, Shanghai Sihao Machinery Equipment Co. Ltd, Shanghai Sishun E-Commerce Co. Ltd, Shanghai Sishun Machinery Equipment Co. Ltd, and Does. The defendant group spans U.S. distributors, Chinese manufacturers, e-commerce entities, and named individuals.
A case stay means the court has paused active proceedings without issuing a final judgment on the merits. In this case, the stay was entered jointly by the parties and the court simultaneously removed the case from its active docket. A stay does not resolve the underlying infringement claims; it suspends procedural deadlines pending a further order, dismissal, or agreed schedule.
Companies making, importing, or selling adjustable dumbbell systems in the U.S. should evaluate freedom-to-operate against US10518123B2, US7614982B2, and US8002680B2. Nautilus's decision to assert all three patents simultaneously against a multi-entity defendant group — including Chinese OEM-connected distributors — signals active enforcement. The specific claim scope of each patent should be independently analysed against target product designs.
Monitor Nautilus's dumbbell patent portfolio before your next product launch
PatSnap Eureka tracks continuation filings and claim scope changes across Nautilus's adjustable dumbbell IP stack. Run a structured FTO against all three asserted patents to de-risk sourcing and product development decisions.
This page is compiled from public court dockets and third-party patent and litigation data via PatSnap Eureka, and is provided for general informational purposes only. The information shown — including party names, patent and application numbers, dates, case status, outcomes, and any analysis — may be incomplete, may not reflect the most recent filings or legal status, and may contain errors or omissions. Verify all details against official court records (for example, PACER) and the relevant patent office before relying on them.
Nothing on this page constitutes legal advice or a legal opinion on the validity, infringement, enforceability, or scope of any patent or case, and no attorney‑client relationship is created by its use. Any description of an outcome (such as a dismissal, settlement, or consent judgment) is a general summary, not a legal determination. All patents, trademarks, and company or law‑firm names are the property of their respective owners. PatSnap makes no warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of this content and disclaims, to the fullest extent permitted by law, all liability for reliance on it. For advice on a specific matter, consult qualified legal counsel.
PatSnap Eureka searches patents and litigation data to answer instantly.