“This Court having entered upon a showing by Plaintiff a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against Defaulting Defendants; Plaintiff having properly completed service of process on Defaulting Defendants, providing notice via e-mail, along with any notice that Defaulting Defendants received from the ecommerce platforms, hosts, and payment processors, being notice reasonably calculated under all circumstances to apprise Defaulting Defendants of the pendency of the action and affording them the opportunity to answer and present their objections; and Defaulting Defendants having failed to answer the Complaint or otherwise plead, and the time for answering the Complaint having expired; THIS COURT HEREBY FINDS that it has personal jurisdiction over Defaulting Defendants because Defaulting Defendants directly target their business activities toward consumers in the United States, including Illinois. Specifically, Defaulting Defendants are reaching out to do business with Illinois residents by operating one or more commercial, interactive Case: 1:22-cv-03444 Document #: 71 Filed: 09/09/24 Page 5 of 13 PageID #:1702 Infringing Websites through which Illinois residents can purchase products infringing Plaintiff’s U.S. Patent No. U.S. Patent Number 10,813,792 (“the ‘792 Patent”). THIS COURT FURTHER FINDS that the Defaulting Defendants are liable for patent infringement (35 U.S.C. § 271). Specifically, this Court finds that the ‘792 Patent is valid and enforceable and that the Defaulting Defendants have infringed Claim 1 of the ‘792 Patent literally and/or through the doctrine of equivalents. THIS COURT FURTHER FINDS that although information about the Defaulting Defendants’ profits and revenues is sparse, that Plaintiff’s efforts provide the best available measure of profits and Plaintiff has established evidence of a minimum reasonable royalty for the ‘792 Patent. THIS COURT FURTHER FINDS that the Defaulting Defendants have willfully infringed the ‘792 Patent. In particular, the Defaulting Defendants have exactly copied Plaintiff’s patented product. The Defaulting Defendants have also attempted to hide their misconduct from Plaintiff by using aliases and taking efforts to conceal their identities. The actions of the Defaulting Defendants subjectively establish that their conduct is egregious, willful, wanton, malicious, and deliberate. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default and Default Judgment is GRANTED in its entirety, that Defaulting Defendants are deemed in default and that this Final Judgment is entered against Defaulting Defendants. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defaulting Defendants, their affiliates, officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, confederates, and all persons acting for, with, by, through, under or in active concert with them be permanently enjoined and restrained from: Case: 1:22-cv-03444 Document #: 71 Filed: 09/09/24 Page 6 of 13 PageID #:1703 1. Offering for sale, selling, and importing any product covered by the ‘792 Patent that is not authorized by Plaintiff; 2. Aiding, abetting, contributing to, or otherwise assisting anyone in infringing the ‘792 Patent; 3. using, linking to, transferring, selling, exercising control over, or otherwise owning or operating the infringing webstores, websites, or any other domain name that is being used to sell or is the means by which the Defaulting Defendants could continue to sell products infringing the ‘792 Patent; 4. operating and/or hosting infringing webstores, websites and any other domain names registered or operated by Defaulting Defendants that are involved with the distribution, importation, offering for sale, or sale of any product covered by the ‘792 Patent not authorized by Plaintiff; 5. Effecting assignments or transfers, forming new entities or associations or utilizing any other device for the purpose of circumventing or avoiding the prohibitions set forth in the above subparagraphs;”