Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
New Millennium Software International v. Starship Technologies et al. | Patent Lawsuit 3:23-cv-03287

New Millennium Software International, LLC v. Starship Technologies, Inc. et al.

3:23-cv-03287 N.D. Cal. Closed US8831780B2
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 30 Jun 2023 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California and closed 9 Nov 2023, with US8831780B2 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: judgment on the merits for defendant.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Patent involved
US8831780B2
Application no.
US13/542387
Case no.
3:23-cv-03287
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
N.D. Cal.
Court level
District Court
Case region
California
Chief judge
Vince Chhabria
Trial level
First instance
Filed – Closed
30 Jun 2023 – 9 Nov 2023
Duration
132 days
Basis of termination
Judgment on the merits for Defendant
Products & marks
System and method for creating virtual presence
Validity challenges
None recorded
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 3:23-cv-03287, United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US8831780B2 Active App. US13/542387

System and method for creating virtual presence

A Global Virtual Presence (SGVP) platform integrates communications, robotics and Men Machine Interface (MMI) technologies and provides a unique way of delivering virtual presence experience to a user. The user can control a Robotic Virtual Explorer Devices (RVEDs) and receive a real-time media stream at his virtual terminal. In addition to real-time interactive video feeds, the system provides a pre-recorded video feed gallery of various most unreachable areas of the world, thereby providing a feeling of virtual-like presence to people, who may never see these places due to physical and financial constraints.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Active
Granted
9 Sep 2014
Est. expiry
25 Dec 2032
Validity challenges
None recorded
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
B25J5/00B25J9/00B25J9/16G05D1/00G05D1/02
Prosecution counsel
GREENBERG & LIEBERMAN, LLC
Examiner
HOLLOWAY, JASON
US8831780B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US8831780B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2
Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Counsel of record

Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“The Court, having dismissed this case with prejudice, now enters judgment in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.”

Case 3:23-cv-03287 · N.D. Cal. · closed 9 November 2023
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 3:23-cv-03287?

3:23-cv-03287 is a patent infringement action brought by New Millennium Software International, LLC against Starship Technologies, Inc., filed on 30 Jun 2023 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The case closed on 9 November 2023.

Which patent was asserted in 3:23-cv-03287?

US8831780B2 (“System and method for creating virtual presence”), assigned to NEW MILLENNIUM SOFTWARE INTERNATIONAL LLC, currently active. The record also lists System and method for creating virtual presence.

How was case 3:23-cv-03287 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is judgment on the merits for defendant. The termination text reads: “The Court, having dismissed this case with prejudice, now enters judgment in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.”

What does dismissal with prejudice mean?

A dismissal with prejudice permanently ends the claims that were filed, so the same claims cannot be brought again against that defendant. It is the usual form when the parties have settled.

How long did case 3:23-cv-03287 take?

132 calendar days, from filing on 30 Jun 2023 to closure on 9 November 2023.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 3:23-cv-03287?

Chief Judge Vince Chhabria presided. Dmitry Kheyfits is recorded as counsel for plaintiff New Millennium Software International. Chaarushena Deb, Gabriel Bell and Richard Gregory Frenkel appear for defendant Starship Technologies.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 3:23-cv-03287 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 3:23-cv-03287 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.