Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
Noco v. Shenzhenshi Daosishangmao Youxiangongsi et al. | Patent Lawsuit 4:23-cv-00554

Noco, Co. v. Shenzhenshi Daosishangmao Youxiangongsi et al.

4:23-cv-00554 S.D. Tex. Closed 5 patents
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 14 Feb 2023 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas and closed 10 May 2023, with 5 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: case stayed.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Case no.
4:23-cv-00554
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
S.D. Tex.
Court level
District Court
Case region
Texas
Chief judge
Lee H Rosenthal
Trial level
First instance
Filed – Closed
14 Feb 2023 – 10 May 2023
Duration
85 days
Basis of termination
Case Stayed
Products & marks
Portable or hand held vehicle battery jump starting apparatus with battery cell equalization circuit · Portable vehicle battery jump start apparatus with safety protection and jumper cable device thereof
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 4:23-cv-00554, United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US10328808B2 Active App. US15/921792

Portable vehicle battery jump start apparatus with safety protection and jumper cable device thereof

A handheld device for jump starting a vehicle engine includes a rechargeable lithium ion battery pack, a microcontroller, and a jumper cable device. The lithium ion battery is coupled to a power output port of the device through a FET smart switch actuated by the microcontroller. A vehicle battery isolation sensor connected in circuit with positive and negative polarity outputs connectable to the jumper cable device detects the presence of a vehicle battery connected between the positive and negative polarity outputs. A reverse polarity sensor connected to the circuit with the positive and negative polarity outputs detects the polarity of a vehicle battery connected between the positive and negative polarity outputs, such that the microcontroller will enable power to be delivered from the lithium ion power pack to the output port only when a good battery is connected to the output port and jumper cable device, and only when the battery is connected with proper polarity of positive and negative terminals.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Active
Granted
25 Jun 2019
Est. expiry
3 Jul 2034
Validity challenges
None recorded
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
H02J7/00H02J1/00
Examiner
DIAO, M BAYE
US10328808B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US10328808B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2
US11254213B2 Active App. US16/461562

Portable or hand held vehicle battery jump starting apparatus with battery cell equalization circuit

A portable or handheld device or apparatus for jump starting a vehicle engine having a depleted or discharged starting battery. The portable or handheld device or apparatus for jump starting a vehicle engine includes a rechargeable lithium-ion (Li-ion) battery pack and a battery cell equalization circuit configured to prevent overcharging of one or more individual lithium-ion battery cells, which can cause fire, damage to the battery pack and device or apparatus for jump starting a vehicle, or personal injury to a user.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Active
Granted
22 Feb 2022
Est. expiry
29 Nov 2038
Validity challenges
None recorded
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
H02J7/00B60L3/00H01M10/0525H01M10/42H01M10/44B60L50/60F02N11/12B60L53/18
Examiner
GRANT, ROBERT
US11254213B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US11254213B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2
Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Counsel of record

Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“The court grants Metasee LLC’s and Ace Farmer LLC’s motion to stay pending resolution of related proceedings before the U.S. International Trade Commission. (Docket Entry No. 30). This case is stayed in its entirety until the resolution of the ITC proceedings. All current deadlines are vacated. The parties must file a joint notice with the court within 14 days of the resolution of the ITC proceedings. The notice must include the parties’ proposal as to how this case should proceed”

Case 4:23-cv-00554 · S.D. Tex. · closed 10 May 2023
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 4:23-cv-00554?

4:23-cv-00554 is a patent infringement action brought by Noco, Co. against Shenzhenshi Daosishangmao Youxiangongsi, filed on 14 Feb 2023 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. The case closed on 10 May 2023.

Which patents were asserted in 4:23-cv-00554?

US10328808B2 (“Portable vehicle battery jump start apparatus with safety protection and jumper cable device thereof”), assigned to THE NOCO COMPANY, currently active; US11254213B2 (“Portable or hand held vehicle battery jump starting apparatus with battery cell equalization circuit”), assigned to THE NOCO COMPANY, currently active; US9770992B2 (“Portable vehicle battery jump start apparatus with safety protection and jumper cable device therefor”), assigned to THE NOCO COMPANY; US11447023B2 (“Portable vehicle battery jump start apparatus with safety protection and jumper cable device thereof”), assigned to THE NOCO COMPANY; US10981452B2 (“Portable or hand held vehicle battery jump starting apparatus with battery cell equalization circuit”), assigned to THE NOCO COMPANY. The record also lists Portable or hand held vehicle battery jump starting apparatus with battery cell equalization circuit and Portable vehicle battery jump start apparatus with safety protection and jumper cable device thereof.

How was case 4:23-cv-00554 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is case stayed. The termination text reads: “The court grants Metasee LLC’s and Ace Farmer LLC’s motion to stay pending resolution of related proceedings before the U.S. International Trade Commission. (Docket Entry No. 30). This case is stayed in its entirety until the resolution of the ITC proceedings. All current deadlines are vacated. The parties must file a joint notice with the court within 14 days of the resolution of the ITC proceedings. The notice must include the parties’ proposal as to how this case should proceed”

How long did case 4:23-cv-00554 take?

85 calendar days, from filing on 14 Feb 2023 to closure on 10 May 2023.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 4:23-cv-00554?

Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal presided. Anna E Raimer, David B. Cochran, John C. Evans and Meredith M. Wilkes are recorded as counsel for plaintiff Noco.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 4:23-cv-00554 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 4:23-cv-00554 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.