Nursing Bra Patent Case Dismissed: Hu v. Schedule A Defendants
What would you like to do next?
Choose your path based on your current needs:
📋 Case Summary
| Case Name | Hao Hu v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A |
| Case Number | 1:24-cv-12217 |
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Duration | Nov 2024 – May 2025 175 days |
| Outcome | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| Patents at Issue | |
| Accused Products | Hands-free pumping seamless nursing bras |
Case Overview
The Parties
⚖️ Plaintiff
Individual patent holder asserting rights under a U.S. design patent covering nursing bra technology.
🛡️ Defendant
A group of anonymous online sellers, typically operating on platforms like Amazon, eBay, or Wish, targeted in common IP enforcement actions.
The Patent at Issue
This case involved a U.S. Design Patent covering an ornamental design for a hands-free pumping seamless nursing bra product:
- • USD1027376S — Ornamental design for hands-free pumping seamless nursing bra products
Designing a similar product?
Check if your nursing bra design might infringe this or related patents.
The Verdict & Legal Analysis
Outcome
On May 20, 2025, the case was dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. No damages were awarded, and no injunctive relief was granted. This dismissal means the plaintiff is barred from refiling the same claims against the same defendants in federal court.
Key Legal Issues
The dismissal was based on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), which allows courts to dismiss an action when a plaintiff fails to prosecute their case or comply with court orders. This outcome underscores the critical importance of consistent prosecutorial diligence, particularly in multi-defendant Schedule A cases targeting online infringers.
Filing a design patent?
Learn from this case. Use AI to draft stronger claims that can withstand litigation.
Power Your Patent Strategy with PatSnap Eureka IP
From novelty searches to patent drafting, PatSnap Eureka’s AI-powered tools help you navigate the patent landscape with confidence.
⚠️ Freedom to Operate (FTO) Analysis
This case highlights critical IP risks in nursing bra design. Choose your next step:
📋 Understand This Case’s Impact
Learn about the specific risks and implications from this litigation.
- View patent USD1027376S details and related prior art
- See typical enforcement patterns in Schedule A cases
- Understand procedural requirements for plaintiffs
🔍 Check My Product’s Risk
Run a comprehensive FTO analysis for your own technology or product.
- Input your product description or technical features
- AI identifies potentially blocking patents
- Get actionable risk assessment report
High Risk Area
Failure to prosecute in Schedule A cases
Patent Still Active
USD1027376S remains in force
Proactive FTO
Crucial for nursing bra designs
✅ Key Takeaways
For Patent Attorneys
Dismissal with prejudice under FRCP 41(b) for failure to prosecute is a terminal outcome for a case; rigorous calendar management is non-negotiable.
Search related case law →Schedule A enforcement strategies require dedicated post-filing attention; early TROs are not a substitute for full prosecution or formal resolution.
Explore precedents →For R&D Teams
Design patent risk in the nursing bra and wearable apparel category remains active; conduct FTO analysis before finalizing product aesthetics.
Start FTO analysis for my product →Design differentiation from patented ornamental features remains the most reliable risk mitigation strategy.
Try AI patent drafting →Ready to Strengthen Your Patent Strategy?
Join thousands of IP professionals using PatSnap Eureka to conduct prior art searches, draft patents, and analyze competitive landscapes.