OHVA, Inc. v. Fiserv, Inc.
Infringement action filed 12 Apr 2022 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas and closed 6 Jun 2023, with US9679286B2 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: dismissed with prejudice.
Case record
- Patent involved
- US9679286B2
- Application no.
- US14/636674
- Case no.
- 6:22-cv-00366
- Verdict cause
- Infringement action
- Court
- W.D. Tex.
- Court level
- District Court
- Case region
- Texas
- Chief judge
- None recorded
- Trial level
- First instance
- Filed – Closed
- 12 Apr 2022 – 6 Jun 2023
- Duration
- 420 days
- Basis of termination
- Dismissed with Prejudice
- Products & marks
- Methods and apparatus for enabling secure network-based transactions
- Validity challenges
- 1 on record
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
Get an FTO claim chart- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
Methods and apparatus for enabling secure network-based transactions
An apparatus includes a transaction card bearing data and having an output interface capable of transmitting the data, a card reader having an input interface enabled to accept the data from the output interface of the transaction card, conversion circuitry converting the card data to an analog modulated signal, and an output pin from the card reader adapted to engage in a microphone port of a computerized appliance, the output pin providing the analog modulated signal to the port, and thence to the computerized appliance.
- Legal status
- Inactive
- Granted
- 13 Jun 2017
- Earliest priority
- 20 Sep 2005
- Est. expiry
- 26 Dec 2026
- Validity challenges
- 1 on recordIPR2023-00921 · Patentability · filed by ASKELADDEN, L.L.C
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- COLNOT, VINCENT CEDRIC · FELLERS, TY
- Classification
- G06Q20/34G06Q20/40H04L9/08H04L29/06H04L9/32
- Prosecution counsel
- Central Coast Patent Agency, LLC
- Examiner
- SHAIKH, MOHAMMAD Z
Parties of record
OHVA, Inc.
- Core tech
- G06Q20/34G06Q20/40H04L9/08H04L29/06
- Counsel
- Isaac Rabicoff
- Firm
- Rabicoff Law LLC
Fiserv, Inc.
- Core tech
- Not recorded
- Counsel
- J. Stephen Ravel · Kelly Ransom · Michael Charles Smith
- Firm
- Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP, Scheef & Stone, LLP
Counsel of record
| Attorney | For | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Isaac Rabicoff | OHVA, Inc. | Plaintiff |
| J. Stephen Ravel | Fiserv, Inc. | Defendant |
| Kelly Ransom | Fiserv, Inc. | Defendant |
| Michael Charles Smith | Fiserv, Inc. | Defendant |
Basis of termination
From the record · verbatim“Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the parties hereby stipulate to dismiss this action with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees.”
Case 6:22-cv-00366 · W.D. Tex. · closed 6 June 2023
Related cases
Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.
Frequently asked questions
What is case 6:22-cv-00366?
6:22-cv-00366 is a patent infringement action brought by OHVA, Inc. against Fiserv, Inc., filed on 12 Apr 2022 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. The case closed on 6 June 2023.
Which patent was asserted in 6:22-cv-00366?
US9679286B2 (“Methods and apparatus for enabling secure network-based transactions”), assigned to OHVA, INC., currently inactive. The record also lists Methods and apparatus for enabling secure network-based transactions.
How was case 6:22-cv-00366 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is dismissed with prejudice. The termination text reads: “Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the parties hereby stipulate to dismiss this action with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees.”
What does dismissal with prejudice mean?
A dismissal with prejudice permanently ends the claims that were filed, so the same claims cannot be brought again against that defendant. It is the usual form when the parties have settled.
How long did case 6:22-cv-00366 take?
420 calendar days, from filing on 12 Apr 2022 to closure on 6 June 2023.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 6:22-cv-00366?
Isaac Rabicoff is recorded as counsel for plaintiff OHVA. J. Stephen Ravel, Kelly Ransom and Michael Charles Smith appear for defendant Fiserv.
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 6:22-cv-00366 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.