Onstream Media, Corp. v. Softermii, Inc.
Infringement action filed 19 May 2023 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas and closed 14 Sep 2023, with 9 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: dismissed without prejudice.
Case record
- Patents involved
- US10848707B2US9467728B2US10038930B2US10951855B2US11128833B2US10200648B2US10674109B2US10694142B2US9161068B2
- Case no.
- 6:23-cv-00390
- Verdict cause
- Infringement action
- Court
- W.D. Tex.
- Court level
- District Court
- Case region
- Texas
- Chief judge
- David Alan Ezra
- Trial level
- First instance
- Filed – Closed
- 19 May 2023 – 14 Sep 2023
- Duration
- 118 days
- Basis of termination
- Dismissed without Prejudice
- Products & marks
- Remotely accessed virtual recording room
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
Get an FTO claim chart- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
Remotely accessed virtual recording room
An audio/video stream recording, storage, and delivery system 10 utilizes an Internet-based browser connection. The system 10 includes recording software 20, storage memory 30, a code generator 40, and a user interface 50. Preferably, the recording software 20 is located on the host back end 60 where it processes and records audio and video material that originates from the user front end 70 and is streamed to the host back end. The storage memory 30, which is also located on the host back end 60, stores the recorded audio and video material. The user interface 50 to the system provides a user located at the user front end 70 with remote access to a virtual recording room. The user interface 50 further enables the user to record audio and video material streamed from the user front end 70 by activating the recording software 20 located on the host back end 60. This is accomplished without requiring recording functionality on the user front end 70. The code generator 30 produces code associated with the recorded audio and video material. This code can be easily copied and pasted to an additional location 80, such as an auction website. Activating the code pasted at the additional location 80 provides access to the recorded audio and video material from the additional location while allowing the recorded audio and video material to remain stored at the host back end 60.
- Legal status
- Inactive
- Granted
- 24 Nov 2020
- Est. expiry
- 24 Mar 2024
- Validity challenges
- None recorded
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- ELLIS, GREGORY DUANE
- Classification
- H04N5/77H04N7/173G11B27/031H04N21/643H04N21/61H04N21/4782H04N21/232H04N21/475H04N21/658H04N21/6587H04N21/4143H04N21/2747H04N21/231H04N21/2543H04N5/91
- Prosecution counsel
- PLUMSEA LAW GROUP, LLC
- Examiner
- LANGHNOJA, KUNAL
Remotely accessed virtual recording room
An audio/video stream recording, storage, and delivery system 10 utilizes an Internet-based browser connection. The system 10 includes recording software 20, storage memory 30, a code generator 40, and a user interface 50. Preferably, the recording software 20 is located on the host back end 60 where it processes and records audio and video material that originates from the user front end 70 and is streamed to the host back end. The storage memory 30, which is also located on the host back end 60, stores the recorded audio and video material. The user interface 50 to the system provides a user located at the user front end 70 with remote access to a virtual recording room. The user interface 50 further enables the user to record audio and video material streamed from the user front end 70 by activating the recording software 20 located on the host back end 60. This is accomplished without requiring recording functionality on the user front end 70. The code generator 30 produces code associated with the recorded audio and video material. This code can be easily copied and pasted to an additional location 80, such as an auction website. Activating the code pasted at the additional location 80 provides access to the recorded audio and video material from the additional location while allowing the recorded audio and video material to remain stored at the host back end 60.
- Legal status
- Active
- Granted
- 11 Oct 2016
- Est. expiry
- 16 Dec 2027
- Validity challenges
- 1 on recordIPR2020-01525 · filed by Facebook, Inc.
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- ELLIS, GREGORY
- Classification
- H04N5/00H04N21/2543H04N21/4143H04N21/475H04N21/658H04N21/6587H04N21/231H04N21/232H04N21/4782H04N21/61H04N21/643G06F17/30H04N21/2747H04N7/173H04N5/91
- Prosecution counsel
- PLUMSEA LAW GROUP, LLC
- Examiner
- FOSSELMAN, JOEL
Also asserted in this case
7 moreThe docket lists 9 asserted patents. Full bibliographic detail, drawings and prosecution history for the remaining 7 asserted patents are one query away in Eureka.
- US10038930B2Remotely accessed virtual recording room
- US10951855B2Remotely accessed virtual recording room
- US11128833B2Remotely accessed virtual recording room
- US10200648B2Remotely accessed virtual recording room
- US10674109B2Remotely accessed virtual recording room
- US10694142B2Remotely accessed virtual recording room
- US9161068B2Remotely accessed virtual recording room
Parties of record
Onstream Media, Corp.
- Core tech
- H04N5/77H04N7/173G11B27/031H04N21/643
- Counsel
- Chandran B. Iyer · Oded Burger · Ronald M. Daignault · Zachary H. Ellis
- Firm
- Daignault Iyer LLP
Softermii, Inc.
- Core tech
- Not recorded
- Counsel
- Not recorded
- Firm
- Not recorded
Counsel of record
| Attorney | For | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Chandran B. Iyer | Onstream Media, Corp. | Plaintiff |
| Oded Burger | Onstream Media, Corp. | Plaintiff |
| Ronald M. Daignault | Onstream Media, Corp. | Plaintiff |
| Zachary H. Ellis | Onstream Media, Corp. | Plaintiff |
Basis of termination
From the record · verbatim“Plaintiff Onstream Media Corporation (“Onstream”) hereby dismisses this action without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i): 1. Onstream filed its Complaint in the above-titled action against Softermii, Inc. (“Softermii”) on May 19, 2023. 2. Softermii has not served an answer of a motion for summary judgment in this action. 3. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) provides that a plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment. 4. Accordingly, Onstream hereby dismisses this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i).”
Case 6:23-cv-00390 · W.D. Tex. · closed 14 September 2023
Related cases
Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.
Frequently asked questions
What is case 6:23-cv-00390?
6:23-cv-00390 is a patent infringement action brought by Onstream Media, Corp. against Softermii, Inc., filed on 19 May 2023 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. The case closed on 14 September 2023.
Which patents were asserted in 6:23-cv-00390?
US10848707B2 (“Remotely accessed virtual recording room”), assigned to ONSTREAM MEDIA CORPORATION, currently inactive; US9467728B2 (“Remotely accessed virtual recording room”), assigned to ONSTREAM MEDIA CORPORATION, currently active; US10038930B2 (“Remotely accessed virtual recording room”), assigned to ONSTREAM MEDIA CORPORATION; US10951855B2 (“Remotely accessed virtual recording room”), assigned to ONSTREAM MEDIA CORPORATION; US11128833B2 (“Remotely accessed virtual recording room”), assigned to ONSTREAM MEDIA CORPORATION; US10200648B2 (“Remotely accessed virtual recording room”), assigned to ONSTREAM MEDIA CORPORATION; US10674109B2 (“Remotely accessed virtual recording room”), assigned to ONSTREAM MEDIA CORPORATION; US10694142B2 (“Remotely accessed virtual recording room”), assigned to ONSTREAM MEDIA CORPORATION; US9161068B2 (“Remotely accessed virtual recording room”), assigned to ONSTREAM MEDIA CORPORATION. The record also lists Remotely accessed virtual recording room.
How was case 6:23-cv-00390 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is dismissed without prejudice. The termination text reads: “Plaintiff Onstream Media Corporation (“Onstream”) hereby dismisses this action without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i): 1. Onstream filed its Complaint in the above-titled action against Softermii, Inc. (“Softermii”) on May 19, 2023. 2. Softermii has not served an answer of a motion for summary judgment in this action. 3. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) provides that a plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment. 4. Ac
What does dismissal without prejudice mean?
A dismissal without prejudice ends this action but leaves the claims alive — the plaintiff may file them again later, subject to the limitation period.
How long did case 6:23-cv-00390 take?
118 calendar days, from filing on 19 May 2023 to closure on 14 September 2023.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 6:23-cv-00390?
Chief Judge David Alan Ezra presided. Chandran B. Iyer, Oded Burger, Ronald M. Daignault and Zachary H. Ellis are recorded as counsel for plaintiff Onstream Media.
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 6:23-cv-00390 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.