Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
Patent Armory v. LG Electronics | Patent Lawsuit 6:23-cv-00326

Patent Armory, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc.

6:23-cv-00326 W.D. Tex. Closed 3 patents
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 5 May 2023 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas and closed 27 Oct 2023, with 3 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: voluntary dismissal.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Case no.
6:23-cv-00326
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
W.D. Tex.
Court level
District Court
Case region
Texas
Chief judge
Alan D Albright
Trial level
First instance
Filed – Closed
5 May 2023 – 27 Oct 2023
Duration
175 days
Basis of termination
Voluntary dismissal
Products & marks
Mobile communication device with electromagnetic radiation sensors · Phased array sound system · Wireless communication device with integrated electromagnetic radiation sensors
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 6:23-cv-00326, United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US7130430B2 Inactive App. US10/024159

Phased array sound system

An array of speakers are fed from a single source of audio frequency sound but each speaker transmits the sound delayed by an amount which is determined by the distance between a particular speaker and a selected region in space, so that sound from each speaker constructively adds at the selected region in space. A sufficiently large number of speakers are employed so that when sound reaches a region in space at the same moment in time the audio volume will be increased substantially over sound in regions where there is not constructive interference. This simple technique allows audio frequency sound to be heard in only selected regions within the room or other auditory space. Multiple regions with multiple soundtracks can be created by simultaneously playing variously delayed soundtracks over each of the speakers in the array.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Inactive
Granted
31 Oct 2006
Est. expiry
28 Feb 2024
Validity challenges
None recorded
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
H04B3/00H04R1/40H04R3/12H04R27/00
Prosecution counsel
STIENNON & STIENNON
Examiner
PENDLETON, BRIAN T.
US7130430B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US7130430B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2
US8275413B1 Active App. US13/303054

Wireless communication device with integrated electromagnetic radiation sensors

A hand-held mobile communication device, such as smart telephone, incorporating sensors and signal conditioning modules for measuring signals from external sources of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) in the low, radio, ultraviolet, and infrared spectral ranges. These include the detector for receiving and monitoring electromagnetic fields originating from various external sources of radiation that pose potential health hazards or may interfere with various electronic devices. The mobile phone equipped with such sensors could alternate between communication and monitoring functions. Other integrated EMR sensors are a photodiode for the ultraviolet detection to monitor the user’s sun exposure and a thermopile for non-contact measurement of temperature of humans or inanimate objects. This infrared sensor in combination with a photographic digital camera and a pattern recognition signal processing allows measuring temperatures at specific locations and from optimal distances to the surface of the object to enhance accuracy of non-contact temperature measurements.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Active
Granted
25 Sep 2012
Earliest priority
17 Sep 2011
Est. expiry
22 Nov 2031
Validity challenges
None recorded
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
H04M1/00H04B1/16H04M1/72403
Prosecution counsel
Fraden Corporation
Examiner
TRINH, SONNY
US8275413B1 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2

Also asserted in this case

1 more

The docket lists 3 asserted patents. Full bibliographic detail, drawings and prosecution history for the remaining asserted patent are one query away in Eureka.

Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Counsel of record

Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff hereby dismisses this action with prejudice. Defendant has not yet answered the Complaint or moved for summary judgment. Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees.”

Case 6:23-cv-00326 · W.D. Tex. · closed 27 October 2023
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 6:23-cv-00326?

6:23-cv-00326 is a patent infringement action brought by Patent Armory, Inc. against LG Electronics, Inc., filed on 5 May 2023 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. The case closed on 27 October 2023.

Which patents were asserted in 6:23-cv-00326?

US7130430B2 (“Phased array sound system”), assigned to PATENT ARMORY INC., currently inactive; US8275413B1 (“Wireless communication device with integrated electromagnetic radiation sensors”), assigned to THE FRADEN FAMILY TRUST, currently active; US8825112B1 (“Mobile communication device with electromagnetic radiation sensors”), assigned to THE FRADEN FAMILY TRUST. The record also lists Mobile communication device with electromagnetic radiation sensors, Phased array sound system and Wireless communication device with integrated electromagnetic radiation sensors.

How was case 6:23-cv-00326 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is voluntary dismissal. The termination text reads: “Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff hereby dismisses this action with prejudice. Defendant has not yet answered the Complaint or moved for summary judgment. Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees.”

What does dismissal with prejudice mean?

A dismissal with prejudice permanently ends the claims that were filed, so the same claims cannot be brought again against that defendant. It is the usual form when the parties have settled.

How long did case 6:23-cv-00326 take?

175 calendar days, from filing on 5 May 2023 to closure on 27 October 2023.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 6:23-cv-00326?

Chief Judge Alan D Albright presided. Isaac Rabicoff is recorded as counsel for plaintiff Patent Armory. Melissa Richards Smith appears for defendant LG Electronics.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 6:23-cv-00326 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 6:23-cv-00326 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.