Patent Armory v. Teleflora: Stipulated Dismissal in Call Routing & Auction Matching Patent Case
What would you like to do next?
Choose your path based on your current needs:
📋 Case Summary
| Case Name | Patent Armory, Inc. v. Teleflora LLC |
| Case Number | 1:25-cv-01241 |
| Court | United States District Court for the District of Delaware (Chief Judge Maryellen Noreika) |
| Duration | Oct 2025 – Nov 2025 28 days |
| Outcome | Plaintiff Claims Dismissed WITH PREJUDICE |
| Patents at Issue | |
| Accused Products | Teleflora’s commercial deployment of intelligent call routing for customer order management and its platform-level auction or matching mechanisms. |
Case Overview
The Parties
⚖️ Plaintiff
A patent assertion entity focused on enforcing telecommunications and data-matching patents against commercial technology operators.
🛡️ Defendant
A well-established floral delivery network and e-commerce operator, integrating telephony-based ordering systems and online marketplace functionality.
Patents at Issue
This case involved two patents covering telephony call routing intelligence and auction-based entity matching systems that have broad commercial relevance:
- • US9456086B1 — Method and system for matching entities in an auction
- • US7023979B1 — Telephony control system with intelligent call routing
Deploying similar call routing or auction matching technology?
Check if your systems might infringe these or related patents.
The Verdict & Legal Analysis
Outcome
The case was terminated via **stipulated dismissal (Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii))** just 28 days after filing. Patent Armory’s claims were dismissed **WITH PREJUDICE**, while Teleflora’s counterclaims were dismissed **WITHOUT PREJUDICE**. No damages or injunctive relief were entered.
Key Legal Issues
The rapid resolution suggests early settlement negotiations, potentially driven by Teleflora’s strong defense posture and the counsel of Fish & Richardson PC. The asymmetric prejudice (plaintiff’s claims with prejudice, defendant’s counterclaims without) is a significant legal detail, preserving Teleflora’s options for future proceedings.
Filing patents in call routing or auction matching?
Learn from this case. Use AI to draft stronger claims that can withstand litigation.
Power Your Patent Strategy with Eureka IP
From novelty searches to patent drafting, Eureka’s AI-powered tools help you navigate the patent landscape with confidence.
⚠️ Freedom to Operate (FTO) Analysis
This case highlights critical IP risks in call routing and auction matching. Choose your next step:
📋 Understand This Case’s Impact
Learn about the specific risks and implications from this litigation.
- View related patents in call routing and auction matching
- See which companies are most active in these technology spaces
- Understand common claim patterns in telecom/e-commerce
🔍 Check My Product’s Risk
Run a comprehensive FTO analysis for your own technology or product.
- Input your product description or technical features
- AI identifies potentially blocking patents
- Get actionable risk assessment report
High Risk Area
Telephony call routing & auction matching systems
2 Patents at Issue
US9456086B1, US7023979B1
Rapid Resolution
Case dismissed within 28 days
✅ Key Takeaways
For Patent Attorneys & Litigators
Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) stipulated dismissals with asymmetric prejudice are sophisticated negotiated exits protecting both parties’ interests.
Search related case law →Delaware remains the dominant PAE assertion venue; early engagement with premier counsel can accelerate favorable resolution.
Explore precedents →For R&D Leaders & In-House Counsel
Proactive FTO analysis for intelligent call routing systems and auction-based matching platforms is advisable before product deployment or expansion.
Start FTO analysis for my product →The asserted patents remain unadjudicated on validity, meaning assertion risk persists across the telephony and marketplace-matching sectors.
Try AI patent drafting →Ready to Strengthen Your Patent Strategy?
Join thousands of IP professionals using Eureka to conduct prior art searches, draft patents, and analyze competitive landscapes.