Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
Pawesome Pet Products et al. v. Colorflowers et al. | Patent Lawsuit 2:22-cv-00629

Pawesome Pet Products, LLC et al. v. Colorflowers et al.

2:22-cv-00629 W.D. Pa. Closed US10477838B2
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 28 Apr 2022 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania and closed 14 Nov 2023, with US10477838B2 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: judgment on the merits for plaintiff.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Patent involved
US10477838B2
Application no.
US15/472206
Case no.
2:22-cv-00629
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
W.D. Pa.
Court level
District Court
Case region
Pennsylvania
Chief judge
Mark R. Hornak
Trial level
First instance
Filed – Closed
28 Apr 2022 – 14 Nov 2023
Duration
565 days
Basis of termination
Judgment on the merits for Plaintiff
Products & marks
Chew toy for Pet dental hygiene
Validity challenges
None recorded
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 2:22-cv-00629, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US10477838B2 Active App. US15/472206

Pet chew toy for dental self-cleaning by domestic pets

A pet chew toy allowing for the self-cleaning of teeth by domestic pets. The pet toy includes one or more cavities into which a pet’s teeth may engage, and the inner and outer surfaces of the cavities may have scrubbing elements designed to enhance removal of plaque and other unhygienic products from a pet’s teeth and gums. The chew toy may further include projections to enhance stabilization of the chew toy by the pet, and a reservoir and dispensing system for pet toothpaste or similar additive.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Active
Granted
19 Nov 2019
Earliest priority
28 Mar 2016
Est. expiry
28 Mar 2037
Validity challenges
None recorded
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
A01K15/02A46B9/02A46B1/00
Prosecution counsel
FERENCE & ASSOCIATES LLC
Examiner
VALENTI, ANDREA M
US10477838B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US10477838B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2
Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Defendant

Colorflowers

Core tech
Not recorded
Counsel
Not recorded
Firm
Not recorded
Also named
Rayshop90 · Fagu7386 · Jmshop Store · Keithbates2012 · Minaudas · Others too numerous to list: DAYON_60, BESTZYKJ, MS HLHW03 STORE, DTMGOODS, MIXX LABORATORY, LIUMING79, COZY STYLE STORE, ENRIKASTORE, ILUZION69, KINGWORAUS, PAWFECTDEPOT, MUJOUTDAY, DAI DEPARTMENT STORE, NIGHACOLLECTION, JOSHBOYSGAMING, SHOP110006051, GOODEDEALSNOGALES, KIDON2014, TASTYBONE STORE, AVERHAYE-0, SHOP 5431295 STORE, SANDYS_PLACE_10, WNWZZ, MEBR007, HONGGANG2019-1, SHANGKEXINRIYONG, ALI CEILING STORE, LOVFU, DULANJANA87, UNEPART, FLOSIK TOYS, YGSYOUTH0410, NFDDIZAYN, PROGUNZXZ, SHOP-MIDA, FIRRY LIVING STORE, DETIAN STORE, VICKIE7772, FAIRYCITY, EVERCHIC SUCH-LIFE STORE, PALPLAZA, YOKEE PET STORE, FUTUSHIJIE STORE, HAPPINESS SUPERMARKET STORE, CHPODOO, MUSTANG692010, HSHEN, WANEN, ALIEXPRESS GOOD KITCHEN ASSISTANT STORE, ZH5682, GITTERM123, STAO STORE, RUIDAXINXI, SHOP4233035 STORE, XINHAO34, JIAYONGJINGMAOYOUZIANGONGSI, JB2010-2012, FCXDG PETSLIFE STORE, PEACEFUL62, QIREN32, FABLAB, STEVENATIN-0, TOBE-UNIQUE, NALINDSILV_0, JSGM17, DANTRESS, HOWARDHOME STORE, AYKEWA0, SMARTBUYSTORE_01, PURS_81, LEADING-WIRELESS, TA-558789, AMVEEDI, ANMEL-9921, TEENWAY, DOGGIEFUN STORE, BESHIL, PHKASI0, PRIMETIMEDISTRIBUTION94, BEAUTY.BOX, ANIYA LIFE STORE, BESTONLINESHOPS, MIAMI98, PUSHMYCART, HJKL PETSLIFE STORE, BOUTIQUE LIFE STORE, APPRETZMEDIA, CITRU_5625, SAVAGLO-15, MANSWILL, JSQQ STORE, THE NEIGHBOR’S STORE, DMG30, MS HLHW01 STORE, IDYDZ_ACCESSORIES, ALITTLETHINGS-XUMU, EMILY154, IIIX_TREAM, PRIMETIME_DISTRIBUTION, ARELYANGELLAURENT, ERUZARAY LIVING STORE, YCLOUD PET STORE, ROHAN_E_MART, CAMGAMESALES, MART-2216, SOLETGO, PETITPET STORE, MUCERIO7788, CUDDLY STORE, MATSOFAMIC PET OFFICIAL STORE, DOGI PET SUPPLIES STORE, SCRAGGY99, HAPPLYONEDAY, DBZON, AIMDOME, IPGY STORE, KCLU_30, NEW LIFE PRODUCTS STORE, ANIMALHOUSE STORE, DJPETSTORE, WANTED2017, CHA_G2GYVK, SUAZNAVARSHOP2, PETFITT, FOREVERYOUNG377, DAYTON_OHIO, JRTE-2662, SHELLBEAL, WA321849, GXBDYXGS, SHOP1100178032 STORE, EUPHORIAHM, XIAZIMEIZHUANG, JACBO_9711, Z-GROBAL, PICK PET OFFICIAL STORE, MHORLX STORE, GNDEALZ, RSCHLAPP, SLICKZTHINGS4U, WGGH, IT AND ME PET STORE, DONGGUAN SHI SHENGKE TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD, SITUO, IRONT7624, DAILYITEMSS, INC, HAPPYDEAL-MALL, DEDAGIRL, YANG168 STORE, LEM_5142, NORTHERNCOMM_33, JTAYLOR3344, SHENZHENDAYANGHUIXINKEJIYOUGONGSI, CHOUYUN, LICRAFT US, NANDAFER, JAFVN FASHION, MS HLHW02 STORE, SIGOLY, ARESTLE HOUSEWARES, ISENVO, JENNLYNNE2, KATJUUS, DZOMNOK STORE, JOYOFRELAX, WONIUNIU, SUNNELI, A INC, YIWU LINGCHONG PETS STORE, TWO L STORE, CHUN_8594, UNIVERSEABC, PRINCESSX4, EDINESSBOSS, EPICESOLUTIONS, FOCUS-PARTS, TEXMEDUSA, BETOCORONA37, NICS_NAXX, DPLIGHT, BELLAS_PAWTIQUE, MAN RUI DEPARTMENT STORE, 4ONTHERUN, TWELVE*29, NOTW92345, SILVA SHOP, SONGWAY PET, ANGELA_HFF78, PETHOBBY RJ-SHOP, HOW-1514, HYXFLY HOUSE STORE, WUHANCHAOYOUKUAJINGDIANZISHANGWUYOUXIANGONGSI · Sankaragi-one · Smartgoals · Tangnert · Taotaopet Store

Counsel of record

Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“ORDERGRANTING145 Motion for DefaultJudgment;and, GRANTING146 Motion for Permanent Injunction. Judgment is GRANTEDin favor ofPlaintiffs on theclaimof patent infringementasserted against Defendants in the Complaint. It is further ORDEREDas set forth herein”

Case 2:22-cv-00629 · W.D. Pa. · closed 14 November 2023
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 2:22-cv-00629?

2:22-cv-00629 is a patent infringement action brought by Pawesome Pet Products, LLC against Colorflowers, filed on 28 Apr 2022 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. The case closed on 14 November 2023.

Which patent was asserted in 2:22-cv-00629?

US10477838B2 (“Pet chew toy for dental self-cleaning by domestic pets”), assigned to GHUKASYAN, CINDY, currently active. The record also lists Chew toy for Pet dental hygiene.

How was case 2:22-cv-00629 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is judgment on the merits for plaintiff. The termination text reads: “ORDERGRANTING145 Motion for DefaultJudgment;and, GRANTING146 Motion for Permanent Injunction. Judgment is GRANTEDin favor ofPlaintiffs on theclaimof patent infringementasserted against Defendants in the Complaint. It is further ORDEREDas set forth herein”

What does judgment on the merits mean?

A judgment on the merits decides the substance of the claims, as opposed to ending the case on procedural grounds.

How long did case 2:22-cv-00629 take?

565 calendar days, from filing on 28 Apr 2022 to closure on 14 November 2023.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 2:22-cv-00629?

Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak presided. Brian Samuel Malkin and Stanley D. Ference III are recorded as counsel for plaintiff Pawesome Pet Products.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 2:22-cv-00629 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 2:22-cv-00629 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.