Pictometry International Corporation v. Roofr Inc.
Patentability filed 16 Sep 2024 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and closed 22 May 2026, with US10648800B2 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: unpatentable.
Case record
- Patent involved
- US10648800B2
- Application no.
- US16/265338
- Case no.
- 24-2322
- Verdict cause
- Patentability
- Court
- Fed. Cir.
- Court level
- Court of Appeals
- Case region
- District of Columbia
- Chief judge
- None recorded
- Trial level
- Appeal
- Filed – Closed
- 16 Sep 2024 – 22 May 2026
- Duration
- 613 days
- Basis of termination
- Unpatentable
- Products & marks
- System and process for roof measurement using imagery
- Validity challenges
- 1 on record
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
Get an FTO claim chart- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
System and process for roof measurement using imagery
The present disclosure describes systems and processes, including processes in which first location data is received. Visual access to a first image corresponding to the first location data is provided, the first image including a roof structure of a building. A first computer input capable of signaling a designation from the user of a building roof structure location within the first image is provided. A designation of the building roof structure location within the first image is received. Responsive to receiving the designation of the building roof structure location, a second computer input capable of signaling user-acceptance of the building roof structure location within the first image is provided. Subsequent to receiving the user-acceptance confirming the designation of the building roof structure location, a report of the roof structure is provided.
- Legal status
- Active
- Granted
- 12 May 2020
- Est. expiry
- 22 May 2029
- Validity challenges
- 1 on recordIPR2023-00435 · Patentability · filed by ROOFR INC
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- THORNBERRY, DALE R. · THORNBERRY, CHRIS T. · GARRINGER, MARK F.
- Classification
- G06K9/00G06F30/13G06F3/0481G06T7/62G01B11/28
- Prosecution counsel
- EagleView
- Examiner
- FITZPATRICK, ATIBA O
Parties of record
Pictometry International Corporation
- Core tech
- G06K9/00G06F30/13G06F3/0481G06T7/62
- Counsel
- Jennifer Chagnon · Jonathan Tuminaro Ph.D. · Michael D. Specht · Richard Crudo · Richard M. Bemben · Steven Pappas · William Milliken
- Firm
- Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox, PLLC
Roofr Inc.
- Core tech
- Not recorded
- Counsel
- James M. Glass · Quincy Lu Mr. · Ron Hagiz · Yury Kapgan
- Firm
- Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
Counsel of record
| Attorney | For | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jennifer Chagnon | Pictometry International Corporation | Plaintiff |
| Jonathan Tuminaro Ph.D. | Pictometry International Corporation | Plaintiff |
| Michael D. Specht | Pictometry International Corporation | Plaintiff |
| Richard Crudo | Pictometry International Corporation | Plaintiff |
| Richard M. Bemben | Pictometry International Corporation | Plaintiff |
| Steven Pappas | Pictometry International Corporation | Plaintiff |
| William Milliken | Pictometry International Corporation | Plaintiff |
| James M. Glass | Roofr Inc. | Defendant |
| Quincy Lu Mr. | Roofr Inc. | Defendant |
| Ron Hagiz | Roofr Inc. | Defendant |
| Yury Kapgan | Roofr Inc. | Defendant |
Basis of termination
From the record · verbatim“THIS CAUSE having been considered, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED : AFFIRMED”
Case 24-2322 · Fed. Cir. · closed 22 May 2026
Related cases
Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.
Frequently asked questions
What is case 24-2322?
24-2322 is a patent patentability brought by Pictometry International Corporation against Roofr Inc., filed on 16 Sep 2024 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The case closed on 22 May 2026.
Which patent was asserted in 24-2322?
US10648800B2 (“System and process for roof measurement using imagery”), assigned to PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL CORP., currently active. The record also lists System and process for roof measurement using imagery.
How was case 24-2322 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is unpatentable. The termination text reads: “THIS CAUSE having been considered, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED : AFFIRMED”
How long did case 24-2322 take?
613 calendar days, from filing on 16 Sep 2024 to closure on 22 May 2026.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 24-2322?
Jennifer Chagnon, Jonathan Tuminaro Ph.D., Michael D. Specht, Richard Crudo, Richard M. Bemben, Steven Pappas and William Milliken are recorded as counsel for plaintiff Pictometry International. James M. Glass, Quincy Lu Mr., Ron Hagiz and Yury Kapgan appear for defendant Roofr.
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 24-2322 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.