Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
Rema Arte Esporte Ltda v. Ricardo Augusto de Lorenzo | Patent Lawsuit 2019729-70.2026.8.26.0000

Rema Arte Esporte Ltda v. Ricardo Augusto de Lorenzo

2019729-70.2026.8.26.0000 Court of Justice of Sao Paulo Closed BRPI0405423B1
Get a prior-art report

Other action filed in the Court of Justice of Sao Paulo and closed 20 May 2026, with BRPI0405423B1 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: appeal dismissed.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Patent involved
BRPI0405423B1
Application no.
BRPI0405423
Case no.
2019729-70.2026.8.26.0000
Verdict cause
Other action
Court
Court of Justice of Sao Paulo
Court level
District Court
Case region
None recorded
Chief judge
None recorded
Trial level
Other
Filed – Closed
None recorded
Duration
None recorded
Basis of termination
Appeal Dismissed
Products & marks
process for application of digital image in braces, maquinário for such application and gotten braces.
Validity challenges
None recorded
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 2019729-70.2026.8.26.0000, Court of Justice of Sao Paulo. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Counsel of record

AttorneyForRole
Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“Before as stated, it is DENIED. The appeal is granted .”

Case 2019729-70.2026.8.26.0000 · Court of Justice of Sao Paulo · closed 20 May 2026
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 2019729-70.2026.8.26.0000?

2019729-70.2026.8.26.0000 is a patent other action brought by Rema Arte Esporte Ltda against Ricardo Augusto de Lorenzo in the Court of Justice of Sao Paulo. The case closed on 20 May 2026.

Which patent was asserted in 2019729-70.2026.8.26.0000?

BRPI0405423B1 (“processo para aplicação de imagem digital em cintas, maquinário para tal aplicação e cintas obtidas.”), assigned to RICARDO AUGUSTO DE LORENZO, currently inactive. The record also lists process for application of digital image in braces, maquinário for such application and gotten braces..

How was case 2019729-70.2026.8.26.0000 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is appeal dismissed. The termination text reads: “Before as stated, it is DENIED. The appeal is granted .”

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 2019729-70.2026.8.26.0000 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 2019729-70.2026.8.26.0000 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.