Sandboni v. All Terrain Bars: Mobile Bar Patent Action Dismissed in 84 Days
Sandboni, Inc. asserted US10703400B2 — covering a mobile bar business package including the ‘Sand Bar’ — against All Terrain Bars LLC and Ronald Burgess in California’s Southern District. The plaintiff voluntarily dismissed without prejudice before the defendant answered, closing the case in just 84 days.
Early voluntary exit in mobile bar patent dispute leaves door open
On July 30, 2024, Sandboni, Inc. filed an infringement action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California (Case No. 3:24-cv-01345) against All Terrain Bars LLC and individual defendant Ronald Burgess. The suit centred on US10703400B2, a patent covering a mobile bar business package that includes the proprietary ‘Sand Bar’ mobile bar product. Sandboni was represented by Adele C. Noon of The Webb Law Firm PC.
The case closed on October 22, 2024 — just 84 days after filing — when Sandboni filed a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), dismissing all claims against both defendants without prejudice. The dismissal was filed before either defendant had answered the complaint or filed a motion for summary judgment, making it a unilateral right of the plaintiff requiring no court order.
The speed of the dismissal — under three months and before any substantive defendant response — is consistent with early settlement, a licensing agreement, or a strategic reassessment of the litigation. Because the dismissal is without prejudice, Sandboni retains the right to refile claims on the same patent against the same defendants. The public record does not disclose whether any agreement was reached, leaving the ultimate commercial resolution unknown.
Filing to Voluntary dismissal in 84 days
84 days — resolved well before typical district court patent litigation timelines of 2+ years
Voluntarily dismissed: what the Rule 41 exit means for both parties
Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i): plaintiff’s unilateral right to exit
Federal Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) allows a plaintiff to dismiss an action without a court order at any time before the defendant serves an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Because All Terrain Bars and Ronald Burgess had not yet responded, Sandboni exercised this right unilaterally. No judicial approval was needed, and no merits determination was made.
Pre-answer voluntary dismissalPublic record is silent on whether a deal underlies the dismissal
The notice expressly states ‘WITHOUT PREJUDICE,’ meaning Sandboni is not barred from refiling the same claims against the same defendants in future. A with-prejudice dismissal would have permanently extinguished those claims. The public record does not confirm whether a settlement, licence, or other agreement was reached — only that the claims were not adjudicated on the merits.
Refiling rights preservedDefendants exit without an adverse ruling — but remain exposed
All Terrain Bars LLC and Ronald Burgess face no court-ordered liability from this action. However, because the dismissal is without prejudice, they cannot treat the matter as fully resolved. If no licence or agreement is in place, Sandboni could refile. Defendants would be prudent to assess their product line’s freedom to operate under US10703400B2.
No res judicata protectionPatent remains live and enforceable in the mobile bar market
US10703400B2 was not challenged, invalidated, or licensed on the public record. Its enforceability is unchanged. Other operators of mobile bar concepts — particularly those using similar ‘sand bar’ or beach-themed portable bar systems — should note that this patent survives and that Sandboni has demonstrated willingness to assert it. The short timeline suggests enforcement strategy may continue.
US10703400B2 remains enforceableFull party and counsel information
| Role | Name | Type | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plaintiff | Sandboni, Inc. | Company | Mobile bar concept and IP holder — owner of US10703400B2 covering the Sand Bar mobile barSearch in Eureka ↗ |
| Defendant | All Terrain Bars LLC | Company | All Terrain Bars LLC and individual Ronald Burgess — accused mobile bar operatorsSearch in Eureka ↗ |
| Co-Defendant | Ronald Burgess | Individual | Search in Eureka ↗ |
| Plaintiff counsel | Adele C. Noon | Attorney | Counsel for Sandboni, Inc.Search in Eureka ↗ |
| Plaintiff law firm | The Webb Law Firm PC | Law Firm | Representing Sandboni, Inc.Search in Eureka ↗ |
| Presiding judge | Judge N/A | Judge | California Southern District CourtSearch in Eureka ↗ |
Official order — verbatim text
The dismissal notice invokes Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) and explicitly states ‘WITHOUT PREJUDICE,’ confirming no merits adjudication occurred. The phrasing that ‘Defendant has not answered or filed a motion for summary judgment’ is legally significant — it is the precise threshold that entitles a plaintiff to dismiss as of right. No court order was required. The without-prejudice designation means claim preclusion does not attach: Sandboni may reassert US10703400B2 against these same defendants in a future action.
US10703400B2 — Mobile Bar Business Package and the ‘Sand Bar’ System
US10703400B2, filed under application number US15/686619, covers the commercial concept and physical apparatus of a mobile bar business package — specifically including the ‘Sand Bar,’ a portable bar unit designed for deployment at events and outdoor venues. The patent’s grant provides Sandboni with exclusivity over this distinctive combination of mobile bar design and business system, positioning it as a barrier to entry for competitors seeking to offer materially similar products or services.
In a fragmented market for experiential and event hospitality equipment, a granted utility patent on a mobile bar package carries meaningful commercial weight. Competitors operating beach-themed or outdoor mobile bar concepts face infringement exposure if their product configuration overlaps with the claims of US10703400B2. The fact that Sandboni was willing to litigate — even briefly — confirms the patent is being actively managed as an enforcement asset, not merely a portfolio placeholder.
Should you run an FTO analysis against US10703400B2?
Any company designing, manufacturing, or commercially operating a mobile bar unit — particularly one marketed as a portable or outdoor event bar — should assess freedom to operate against US10703400B2. This applies to hospitality equipment manufacturers, event hire companies, franchise operators of portable bar concepts, and any start-up building a mobile bar business package. The risk is heightened if your product resembles a sand or beach bar aesthetic.
PatSnap Eureka’s FTO Search Agent allows IP and R&D teams to map your product features against the specific claims of US10703400B2, identify any continuation or divisional applications that may extend protection, and surface design-around options. Running an FTO now — before scaling production or investment — is significantly less costly than defending an infringement action in the Southern District of California.
Run a freedom-to-operate analysis on US10703400B2 to assess your product’s exposure
Run FTO in Eureka →Similar mobile bar and hospitality equipment patent cases in U.S. district courts
Cases involving mobile bar, portable hospitality equipment, and event service patents filed in California and other U.S. district courts — including comparable pre-answer voluntary dismissals.
What this case signals for the mobile bar and experiential hospitality IP landscape
A fast voluntary dismissal without prejudice in a niche product patent case typically signals more than it reveals — here is what operators and IP teams should take away.
Pre-answer dismissals often reflect off-record resolution, not weakness
When a plaintiff dismisses before the defendant even answers, it frequently suggests a swift licence, settlement, or cease-and-desist compliance — not an abandonment of the patent. Sandboni’s patent remains intact, and the without-prejudice framing keeps all enforcement options open. IP teams in adjacent mobile hospitality product categories should not read this as a failed assertion.
Mobile bar and portable hospitality patents are an undermonitored risk category
US10703400B2 covers a specific commercial concept — a mobile bar business package — that intersects product design, hospitality, and event services. Companies building or franchising portable bar concepts should conduct FTO analysis against this patent and related continuation applications before scaling operations or seeking investment.
Sandboni v All — key questions answered
Sandboni dismissed all claims under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) before defendants answered, meaning no merits ruling was made. The ‘without prejudice’ designation means Sandboni retains the right to refile the same patent infringement claims against All Terrain Bars LLC and Ronald Burgess in the future.
The asserted patent is US10703400B2, filed under application US15/686619. It covers a mobile bar business package including the ‘Sand Bar,’ a portable bar unit. Sandboni alleged that All Terrain Bars and Ronald Burgess infringed this patent through their mobile bar products and operations.
Yes. Because the dismissal was without prejudice, Sandboni is not barred by claim preclusion or res judicata. It may refile infringement claims based on US10703400B2 against the same defendants, subject to the applicable statute of limitations for patent infringement, which is generally six years from the date of infringement.
Naming an individual defendant alongside a corporate entity is a common tactic in smaller-entity patent disputes. It may reflect an assessment that Burgess was personally involved in the allegedly infringing activity, or that plaintiff’s counsel wished to apply additional settlement pressure by creating personal liability exposure alongside the LLC’s corporate liability.
The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California (Case No. 3:24-cv-01345). It was filed on July 30, 2024 and closed on October 22, 2024 — a duration of 84 days — following Sandboni’s voluntary dismissal without prejudice under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i).
PatSnap Eureka searches patents and litigation data to answer instantly.