Jodi A. Schwendimann v. Stahls, Inc.
Patentability filed 15 Apr 2022 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and closed 6 Oct 2023, with US7766475B2 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: appeal dismissed in part.
Case record
- Patent involved
- US7766475B2
- Application no.
- US12/193562
- Case no.
- 22-1652
- Verdict cause
- Patentability
- Court
- Fed. Cir.
- Court level
- Court of Appeals
- Case region
- District of Columbia
- Chief judge
- None recorded
- Trial level
- Appeal
- Filed – Closed
- 15 Apr 2022 – 6 Oct 2023
- Duration
- 539 days
- Basis of termination
- Appeal Dismissed in Part
- Products & marks
- Image transfer on a colored base
- Validity challenges
- 3 on record
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
Get an FTO claim chart- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
Image transfer on a colored base
The present invention includes an image transfer sheet. The image transfer sheet comprises a release layer and a polymer layer. One or more of the release layer and the polymer layer comprise titanium oxide or other white pigment.
- Legal status
- Inactive
- Granted
- 3 Aug 2010
- Est. expiry
- 9 Sep 2019
- Validity challenges
- 3 on recordIPR2020-01122 · Patentability · filed by JODI A. SCHWENDIMANN, f/k/a JODI A. DALVEYIPR2020-01122 · Other · filed by Stahls’, Inc.IPR2020-00915 · Other · filed by Neenah, Inc.
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- DALVEY, JODI A. · NASSER, NABILL F.
- Classification
- B41M5/40B41M5/00B41M5/52B44C1/17D06P5/24D06Q1/12
- Prosecution counsel
- Padda Law Group
- Examiner
- HESS, BRUCE H
Parties of record
Jodi A. Schwendimann
- Core tech
- Not recorded
- Counsel
- Britta Loftus · Devan V. Padmanabhan · Michelle Dawson · Paul J. Robbennolt
- Firm
- Padmanabhan & Dawson PLLC
Stahls, Inc.
- Core tech
- Not recorded
- Counsel
- Glenn E. Forbis · James Bradley Luchsinger
- Firm
- Harness dickey & Pierce PLC
Counsel of record
| Attorney | For | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Britta Loftus | Jodi A. Schwendimann | Plaintiff |
| Devan V. Padmanabhan | Jodi A. Schwendimann | Plaintiff |
| Michelle Dawson | Jodi A. Schwendimann | Plaintiff |
| Paul J. Robbennolt | Jodi A. Schwendimann | Plaintiff |
| Glenn E. Forbis | Stahls, Inc. | Defendant |
| James Bradley Luchsinger | Stahls, Inc. | Defendant |
Basis of termination
From the record · verbatim“Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed as moot in light of our affirmance in Schwendimann v. Neenah, Inc., No. 2022-1333, slip op. 22, ––– F.4th –––, ––– (Fed. Cir. Oct. 6, 2023), which renders unpatentable all of the claims at issue in these appeals.”
Case 22-1652 · Fed. Cir. · closed 6 October 2023
Related cases
Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.
Frequently asked questions
What is case 22-1652?
22-1652 is a patent patentability brought by Jodi A. Schwendimann against Stahls, Inc., filed on 15 Apr 2022 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The case closed on 6 October 2023.
Which patent was asserted in 22-1652?
US7766475B2 (“Image transfer on a colored base”), assigned to SCHWENDIMANN, JODI A, currently inactive. The record also lists Image transfer on a colored base.
How was case 22-1652 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is appeal dismissed in part. The termination text reads: “Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed as moot in light of our affirmance in Schwendimann v. Neenah, Inc., No. 2022-1333, slip op. 22, ––– F.4th –––, ––– (Fed. Cir. Oct. 6, 2023), which renders unpatentable all of the claims at issue in these appeals.”
How long did case 22-1652 take?
539 calendar days, from filing on 15 Apr 2022 to closure on 6 October 2023.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 22-1652?
Britta Loftus, Devan V. Padmanabhan, Michelle Dawson and Paul J. Robbennolt are recorded as counsel for plaintiff Jodi A. Schwendimann. Glenn E. Forbis and James Bradley Luchsinger appear for defendant Stahls.
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 22-1652 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.