Scitech Produtos Médicos Ltda v. Cilag GMBH International | Patent Lawsuit 2212462-68.2023.8.26.0000

Case record

Patent involved: BRPI0807365B1
Application no.: BRPI0807365
Case no.: 2212462-68.2023.8.26.0000
Verdict cause: Infringement action
Court: Court of Justice of Sao Paulo
Court level: District Court
Case region: None recorded
Chief judge: None recorded
Trial level: Other
Filed – Closed: None recorded
Duration: None recorded
Basis of termination: Appeal Dismissed
Products & marks: surgical instrument identification cryptographic sustaining electrically-piece interchangeable
Validity challenges: None recorded

Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 2212462-68.2023.8.26.0000, Court of Justice of Sao Paulo. Open this record in Eureka

Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart

10,000 free credits to start

NoveltyFTODesign FTO

BRPI0807365B1 Assess invalidity risk

01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions

Patent at issue

BRPI0807365B1 Active App. BRPI0807365

INSTRUMENTO CIRÚRGICO AUTOALIMENTADO ELETRICAMENTE COM IDENTIFICAÇÃO CRIPTOGRÁFICA DE PEÇA INTERCAMBIÁVEL

ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, INC.

instrumento cirúrgico autoalimentado elétricamente com identificação criptográfica de peça intercambiável um instrumento cirúrgico inclui um efetor terminal cirúrgico, tendo um segmento receptor para receber, de forma removível, no mesmo, uma peça intercambiável. o segmento receptor possui uma conexão de .c omu. nicação. um cabo conectado ao efetor terminal aciona o efetor terminal. o cabo possui um controlador eletricamente conectado com a conexão de comunicação para autenticar a peça intercambiável quando localizada no efetor terminal. uma peça intercambiável é conectada, de forma removível, no segmento receptor e possui um dispositivo de encriptação eletricamente removível, conectado com a conexão de comunicação quando localizado no segmento receptor. o dispositivo de encriptação autentica a peça intercambiável quando solicitado pelo controlador elétrico.

Read claims and description in Eureka Show full abstractHide full abstract

Patent standing

Legal status: Active
Granted: 5 Nov 2019
Earliest priority: 21 Feb 2007
Est. expiry: 21 Feb 2028
Validity challenges: None recorded
Licences recorded: None recorded
Inventors: KEVIN SMITH · THOMAS BALES · MATTHEW PALMER · DEREK DEVILLE · CARLOS RIVERA
Classification: A61B17/04

Get a novelty search report in Eureka

Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims

Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Plaintiff

Scitech Produtos Médicos Ltda

Core tech: Not recorded
Counsel: Not recorded
Firm: Not recorded

View litigation record See its litigation pattern

Defendant

Cilag GMBH International

Core tech: Not recorded
Counsel: Not recorded
Firm: Not recorded

View litigation record See its litigation pattern

Counsel of record

Attorney	For	Role

Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios

Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

"Therefore, the full maintenance of the aggravated decision is strictly maintained. In the light of the foregoing, the action is dismissed."
Case 2212462-68.2023.8.26.0000 · Court of Justice of Sao Paulo · closed 15 December 2023

Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

Who else has this plaintiff sued? Every case naming Scitech Produtos Médicos Ltda, with the patent, court and outcome for each Could my product read on this patent? Claim-by-claim comparison against your own design What else is litigated in this field? The dispute map for diagnosis & surgery

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 2212462-68.2023.8.26.0000?

2212462-68.2023.8.26.0000 is a patent infringement action brought by Scitech Produtos Médicos Ltda against Cilag GMBH International in the Court of Justice of Sao Paulo. The case closed on 15 December 2023.

Which patent was asserted in 2212462-68.2023.8.26.0000?

BRPI0807365B1 (“INSTRUMENTO CIRÚRGICO AUTOALIMENTADO ELETRICAMENTE COM IDENTIFICAÇÃO CRIPTOGRÁFICA DE PEÇA INTERCAMBIÁVEL”), assigned to ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, INC., currently active. The record also lists surgical instrument identification cryptographic sustaining electrically-piece interchangeable.

How was case 2212462-68.2023.8.26.0000 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is appeal dismissed. The termination text reads: "Therefore, the full maintenance of the aggravated decision is strictly maintained. In the light of the foregoing, the action is dismissed."

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 2212462-68.2023.8.26.0000 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Browse related dockets

Cases in Court of Justice of Sao Paulo Cases on diagnosis & surgery All patent litigation records

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 2212462-68.2023.8.26.0000 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.