ScorpCast v. KB Productions & MG Freesites: Dismissed With Prejudice After ~1,310 Days
ScorpCast LLC, operating as HaulStars, sued KB Productions and MG Freesites — operator of Pornhub — in the Eastern District of Texas, asserting US9965780B2 covering interactive video technology. The parties jointly resolved the matter, securing a dismissal with prejudice across six coordinated cases. Each side bears its own costs.
Multi-defendant interactive video patent campaign resolved with prejudice in E.D. Tex.
ScorpCast LLC, doing business as HaulStars, filed this infringement action on June 16, 2020, in the Eastern District of Texas before Chief Judge Rodney Gilstrap. The plaintiff asserted US9965780B2 — an interactive video technology patent — against KB Productions LLC and MG Freesites Ltd., the Cyprus-registered operator behind Pornhub and related adult content platforms. The accused products were identified as Pornhub and associated ‘hub’ and ‘jump’ sites delivering pornographic video content.
The case closed on January 17, 2024, via a joint motion to dismiss filed by all parties. The court granted the motion and dismissed all claims with prejudice, meaning ScorpCast is permanently barred from reasserting the same patent claims against these defendants. The order explicitly directed each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees — a neutral cost allocation consistent with a confidential settlement rather than a litigated outcome.
The resolution covered six coordinated cases (2:20-cv-192, 193, 198, 200, 203, 210), suggesting ScorpCast mounted a coordinated campaign against multiple defendants simultaneously. The nearly 3.5-year duration before joint resolution suggests substantive negotiation likely occurred after claim construction or discovery proceedings. The public record does not disclose financial terms, licensing arrangements, or which party, if any, made concessions — details that typically remain confidential in privately negotiated patent resolutions.
Filing to filing in 1310 days
Case duration — filed June 2020, closed January 2024
Full party and counsel information
| Role | Name | Type | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plaintiff | ScorpCast, LLC | Company | Interactive video tech licensor (HaulStars) — holder of US9965780B2Search in Eureka ↗ |
| Defendant | KB Productions, LLC | Company | MG Freesites Ltd.: operator of Pornhub and affiliated adult video hub platformsSearch in Eureka ↗ |
| Plaintiff counsel | Todd Eric Landis | Attorney | Counsel for ScorpCast, LLCSearch in Eureka ↗ |
| Defendant counsel | Andrew William Stinson | Attorney | Counsel for KB Productions, LLCSearch in Eureka ↗ |
| Defendant counsel | Christopher Gerson | Attorney | Counsel for KB Productions, LLCSearch in Eureka ↗ |
| Defendant counsel | Frank M. Gasparo | Attorney | Counsel for KB Productions, LLCSearch in Eureka ↗ |
| Defendant counsel | Jaewon Lee | Attorney | Counsel for KB Productions, LLCSearch in Eureka ↗ |
| Defendant counsel | Jonathan Mark Sharret | Attorney | Counsel for KB Productions, LLCSearch in Eureka ↗ |
| Defendant counsel | Melissa Richards Smith | Attorney | Counsel for KB Productions, LLCSearch in Eureka ↗ |
| Presiding judge | Judge Rodney Gilstrap | Chief Judge | Texas Eastern District Court — Chief JudgeSearch in Eureka ↗ |
Stipulation of dismissal — official text
The court’s order recites that the parties represented the case ‘has been resolved’ — language that confirms a private agreement exists but whose terms are not before the court. The with-prejudice dismissal forecloses any future assertion of the same claims between these specific parties. The simultaneous closure of six related dockets on identical terms suggests a global settlement covering the full defendant group, rather than individual bilateral resolutions.
US9965780B2 — Interactive video delivery and navigation technology
US9965780B2 (application no. US15/688566) covers interactive video technology — specifically mechanisms by which users navigate, select, or interact with video content in a structured delivery environment. The patent was asserted against video hub and jump-site platforms, suggesting its claims reach features enabling user-directed content browsing or scene navigation at scale. The Eastern District of Texas filing is consistent with the patent being perceived as strong enough to withstand validity scrutiny in a demanding forum.
For video platform operators — whether in adult content, streaming, e-learning, or interactive media — US9965780B2 represents a potentially broad assertion vehicle. ScorpCast demonstrated willingness to pursue large platform operators over multiple years, and the with-prejudice resolution leaves the patent available for assertion against non-party platforms. Any company deploying interactive video navigation, chapter selection, or dynamic content delivery should treat this patent as an active landscape risk until expiry or IPR invalidation.
Should your platform run an FTO check against US9965780B2?
If your product team is building or scaling interactive video features — including user-directed navigation, content jump links, dynamic scene selection, or hub-style video aggregation — US9965780B2 belongs on your FTO watchlist. ScorpCast has demonstrated sustained enforcement intent across multiple defendants in this technology space, and the patent remains active. In-house counsel and R&D leads at video platform companies should not wait for a demand letter to assess claim overlap.
PatSnap Eureka’s FTO Search Agent can map the independent claims of US9965780B2 against your product’s feature set, surface related family members and continuations that may carry similar scope, and flag prosecution history estoppel arguments that may limit claim reach. Setting up a claim-change monitor on this patent ensures you receive alerts if continuation claims with expanded scope are granted — a common risk profile in active licensing campaigns.
Run a freedom-to-operate analysis on US9965780B2 to assess your product’s exposure
Run FTO in Eureka →Similar interactive video patent infringement cases in E.D. Tex.
PatSnap Eureka tracks related litigation across truck body equipment, vehicle accessories, and comparable infringement actions in the Georgia district system.
What this case signals for the interactive video IP licensing landscape
A six-case coordinated campaign ending in prejudicial dismissals suggests US9965780B2 carried enough licensing leverage to reach resolution — but public terms remain opaque.
Interactive video patents are viable enforcement assets against platform operators
ScorpCast’s ability to sustain litigation against MG Freesites — a large-scale video platform operator — for over three years before a joint resolution suggests the patent withstood early validity challenges. Companies operating interactive or user-directed video features should assess their exposure to US9965780B2 and related family members before scaling platform features.
Multi-defendant campaigns in E.D. Tex. remain a preferred enforcement structure
Filing six coordinated cases simultaneously in the Eastern District of Texas — a historically patentee-friendly venue — reflects a deliberate enforcement architecture. Defendants facing similar campaigns should assess early consolidation strategies and inter partes review timing, as the combination of venue pressure and coordinated filing can accelerate licensing leverage for the patent holder.
ScorpCast v KB — key questions answered
The case was dismissed with prejudice on January 17, 2024, pursuant to a joint motion filed by all parties. The court found the case had been resolved and ordered each party to bear its own costs. ScorpCast is permanently barred from asserting the same claims against these defendants.
ScorpCast asserted US9965780B2 (application no. US15/688566), a patent covering interactive video delivery technology. The accused products included Pornhub and related ‘hub’ and ‘jump’ video sites operated by MG Freesites Ltd.
Dismissal with prejudice constitutes a final adjudication on the merits under U.S. federal procedure. ScorpCast cannot refile the same patent infringement claims against KB Productions or MG Freesites. The dismissal does not, however, affect ScorpCast’s ability to assert the patent against other defendants.
ScorpCast filed at least six coordinated cases in June 2020 in the Eastern District of Texas. The January 2024 dismissal order simultaneously closed case numbers 2:20-cv-192, 193, 198, 200, 203, and 210, suggesting a coordinated multi-defendant enforcement campaign resolved globally.
ScorpCast was represented by Todd Eric Landis of Williams Simons & Landis, PLLC. Defendants were represented by attorneys including Frank M. Gasparo, Jonathan Mark Sharret, and Christopher Gerson, with firms including Venable LLP, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Gillam & Smith LLP, and Ramey & Flock PC.
PatSnap Eureka searches patents and litigation data to answer instantly.