Book a demo
ScorpCast v. KB Productions & MG Freesites — Interactive Video Patent Dispute | PatSnap
Explore in Eureka
Case ID2:20-cv-00198
FiledJun 2020
ClosedJan 2024
Patent Litigation

ScorpCast v. KB Productions & MG Freesites: Dismissed With Prejudice After ~1,310 Days

ScorpCast LLC, operating as HaulStars, sued KB Productions and MG Freesites — operator of Pornhub — in the Eastern District of Texas, asserting US9965780B2 covering interactive video technology. The parties jointly resolved the matter, securing a dismissal with prejudice across six coordinated cases. Each side bears its own costs.

Resolution time
1310days
Case duration — filed June 2020, closed January 2024
Patents asserted
1
US9965780B2 — interactive video delivery technology
Outcome
Dismissed with Prejudice
With prejudice — ScorpCast cannot refile the same claims against these defendants
Cost ruling
Own costs
Each party bears its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees per court order
Published by PatSnap Insights Team · Verified by PatSnap Eureka Data
Case overview

Multi-defendant interactive video patent campaign resolved with prejudice in E.D. Tex.

ScorpCast LLC, doing business as HaulStars, filed this infringement action on June 16, 2020, in the Eastern District of Texas before Chief Judge Rodney Gilstrap. The plaintiff asserted US9965780B2 — an interactive video technology patent — against KB Productions LLC and MG Freesites Ltd., the Cyprus-registered operator behind Pornhub and related adult content platforms. The accused products were identified as Pornhub and associated ‘hub’ and ‘jump’ sites delivering pornographic video content.

The case closed on January 17, 2024, via a joint motion to dismiss filed by all parties. The court granted the motion and dismissed all claims with prejudice, meaning ScorpCast is permanently barred from reasserting the same patent claims against these defendants. The order explicitly directed each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees — a neutral cost allocation consistent with a confidential settlement rather than a litigated outcome.

The resolution covered six coordinated cases (2:20-cv-192, 193, 198, 200, 203, 210), suggesting ScorpCast mounted a coordinated campaign against multiple defendants simultaneously. The nearly 3.5-year duration before joint resolution suggests substantive negotiation likely occurred after claim construction or discovery proceedings. The public record does not disclose financial terms, licensing arrangements, or which party, if any, made concessions — details that typically remain confidential in privately negotiated patent resolutions.

Case at a glance
Case no.2:20-cv-00198
CourtTexas Eastern
JudgeRodney Gilstrap
FiledJune 16, 2020
ClosedJanuary 17, 2024
Duration1310 days
OutcomeDismissed with Prejudice
Verdict causeInfringement Action
BasisDismissed with Prejudice
Prior Art Intelligence
See what prior art exists on this patent.
Eureka scans millions of patents and papers to surface prior art that may have invalidated these claims before costly litigation begins.
Check Prior Art
Case data sourced from PACER / Texas Eastern District Court via PatSnap Eureka Litigation Intelligence Explore similar cases ↗
Case timeline

Filing to filing in 1310 days

Case duration — filed June 2020, closed January 2024

Case timeline: Complaint filed May 13 2025, APR–MAY — 1310 days total Horizontal timeline showing the three key events in ScorpCast, LLC v KB Productions, LLC from filing to voluntary dismissal. Source: PACER, Texas Eastern District Court. JUN 16 2020 Complaint filed APR–MAY 2020 Pre-trial proceedings JAN 17 2024 Ongoing in progress 1310 DAYS TOTAL
Parties and representation

Full party and counsel information

RoleNameTypeDetail
PlaintiffScorpCast, LLCCompanyInteractive video tech licensor (HaulStars) — holder of US9965780B2Search in Eureka ↗
DefendantKB Productions, LLCCompanyMG Freesites Ltd.: operator of Pornhub and affiliated adult video hub platformsSearch in Eureka ↗
Plaintiff counselTodd Eric LandisAttorneyCounsel for ScorpCast, LLCSearch in Eureka ↗
Defendant counselAndrew William StinsonAttorneyCounsel for KB Productions, LLCSearch in Eureka ↗
Defendant counselChristopher GersonAttorneyCounsel for KB Productions, LLCSearch in Eureka ↗
Defendant counselFrank M. GasparoAttorneyCounsel for KB Productions, LLCSearch in Eureka ↗
Defendant counselJaewon LeeAttorneyCounsel for KB Productions, LLCSearch in Eureka ↗
Defendant counselJonathan Mark SharretAttorneyCounsel for KB Productions, LLCSearch in Eureka ↗
Defendant counselMelissa Richards SmithAttorneyCounsel for KB Productions, LLCSearch in Eureka ↗
Presiding judgeJudge Rodney GilstrapChief JudgeTexas Eastern District Court — Chief JudgeSearch in Eureka ↗
Official verdict

Stipulation of dismissal — official text

“Before the Court is the Joint Motion to Dismiss (the “Motion”) filed by Plaintiff Scorpcast LLC d/b/a HaulStars and Defendants Boutique Media PTY LTD, All 4 Health SRL, KB Productions, LLC, Manica Media SL, Oanasun Entertainment SRL, Bravomax Services Limited (Dkt. No. 190.) In the Motion, the parties represent that the above-captioned case has been resolved and request dismissal of the above-captioned action WITH prejudice. (Id. at 1.) Having considered the Motion, the Court finds that it should be and hereby is GRANTED. Accordingly, all claims and causes of action asserted between Plaintiff and Defendants in the above-captioned case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party is to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees. All pending requests for relief in the above-captioned case not explicitly granted herein are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE cases 2:20-cv-193, 2:20-cv-192, 2:20-cv-198, 2:20-cv-200, 2:20-cv-203, and 2:20-cv-210 as no parties or claims remain.”
Source: PACER Docket, Case 2:20-cv-00198, Texas Eastern District Court · Filed January 17, 2024

The court’s order recites that the parties represented the case ‘has been resolved’ — language that confirms a private agreement exists but whose terms are not before the court. The with-prejudice dismissal forecloses any future assertion of the same claims between these specific parties. The simultaneous closure of six related dockets on identical terms suggests a global settlement covering the full defendant group, rather than individual bilateral resolutions.

PACER case 2:20-cv-00198 · Public docket record Explore in Eureka ↗
Patent at issue

US9965780B2 — Interactive video delivery and navigation technology

Publication No.US9965780B2
Application No.US15/688566
Patent details
AssigneeScorpCast, LLC
ProductUS9965780B2 — interactive video platform navigation system
Publication typeB2 — grant (with prior publication)
Cited in actionJune 16, 2020

US9965780B2 (application no. US15/688566) covers interactive video technology — specifically mechanisms by which users navigate, select, or interact with video content in a structured delivery environment. The patent was asserted against video hub and jump-site platforms, suggesting its claims reach features enabling user-directed content browsing or scene navigation at scale. The Eastern District of Texas filing is consistent with the patent being perceived as strong enough to withstand validity scrutiny in a demanding forum.

For video platform operators — whether in adult content, streaming, e-learning, or interactive media — US9965780B2 represents a potentially broad assertion vehicle. ScorpCast demonstrated willingness to pursue large platform operators over multiple years, and the with-prejudice resolution leaves the patent available for assertion against non-party platforms. Any company deploying interactive video navigation, chapter selection, or dynamic content delivery should treat this patent as an active landscape risk until expiry or IPR invalidation.

Patent data sourced from USPTO via PatSnap Eureka patent database Search patent records in Eureka ↗
Freedom to operate

Should your platform run an FTO check against US9965780B2?

If your product team is building or scaling interactive video features — including user-directed navigation, content jump links, dynamic scene selection, or hub-style video aggregation — US9965780B2 belongs on your FTO watchlist. ScorpCast has demonstrated sustained enforcement intent across multiple defendants in this technology space, and the patent remains active. In-house counsel and R&D leads at video platform companies should not wait for a demand letter to assess claim overlap.

PatSnap Eureka’s FTO Search Agent can map the independent claims of US9965780B2 against your product’s feature set, surface related family members and continuations that may carry similar scope, and flag prosecution history estoppel arguments that may limit claim reach. Setting up a claim-change monitor on this patent ensures you receive alerts if continuation claims with expanded scope are granted — a common risk profile in active licensing campaigns.

PatSnap Eureka FTO Search

Run a freedom-to-operate analysis on US9965780B2 to assess your product’s exposure

Run FTO in Eureka →
Related litigation

Similar interactive video patent infringement cases in E.D. Tex.

PatSnap Eureka tracks related litigation across truck body equipment, vehicle accessories, and comparable infringement actions in the Georgia district system.

🔍
Access 40+ similar cases in PatSnap Eureka
ScorpCast, LLC patent enforcement history, Texas Eastern case history, ScorpCast, LLC’s full IP portfolio, and comparable case analysis
HaulStars v. Manica MediaHaulStars v. Boutique MediaE.D. Tex. video platform casesInteractive video § 101 rulings
Unlock similar cases in Eureka →
Strategic implications

What this case signals for the interactive video IP licensing landscape

A six-case coordinated campaign ending in prejudicial dismissals suggests US9965780B2 carried enough licensing leverage to reach resolution — but public terms remain opaque.

Interactive video patents are viable enforcement assets against platform operators

ScorpCast’s ability to sustain litigation against MG Freesites — a large-scale video platform operator — for over three years before a joint resolution suggests the patent withstood early validity challenges. Companies operating interactive or user-directed video features should assess their exposure to US9965780B2 and related family members before scaling platform features.

Multi-defendant campaigns in E.D. Tex. remain a preferred enforcement structure

Filing six coordinated cases simultaneously in the Eastern District of Texas — a historically patentee-friendly venue — reflects a deliberate enforcement architecture. Defendants facing similar campaigns should assess early consolidation strategies and inter partes review timing, as the combination of venue pressure and coordinated filing can accelerate licensing leverage for the patent holder.

🔒
Full strategic analysis in PatSnap Eureka
Includes sector IP trends, Judge Treadwell’s case history, and FTO risk assessment for the truck equipment space
Claim mapping risk tiersScorpCast portfolio depthE.D. Tex. venue data
Unlock full analysis →
Analysis powered by PatSnap Eureka Litigation Intelligence Explore in Eureka ↗
Frequently asked questions

ScorpCast v KB — key questions answered

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka can answer them instantly from patent and litigation data. Ask Eureka ↗
PatSnap Eureka

Run your own interactive video patent landscape analysis

Use PatSnap Eureka to map claim scope, monitor continuation filings, and track enforcement activity around US9965780B2 before a demand letter arrives. FTO analysis and litigation monitoring built for IP and R&D teams.

Ask anything about this case.
PatSnap Eureka searches patents and litigation data to answer instantly.
Powered by PatSnap Eureka
Link copied to clipboard

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.