Securenet Solutions Group, LLC v. Milestone Systems
Infringement action filed 14 Jul 2025 in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon and closed 6 May 2026, with 9 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: voluntary dismissal.
Case record
- Patents involved
- US9619984B2US10587460B2US11929870B2US10862744B2US10020987B2US9344616B2US11323314B2US8354926B2US8130098B2
- Case no.
- 3:25-cv-01232
- Verdict cause
- Infringement action
- Court
- D. Or.
- Court level
- District Court
- Case region
- Oregon
- Chief judge
- Amy E. Potter
- Trial level
- First instance
- Filed – Closed
- 14 Jul 2025 – 6 May 2026
- Duration
- 296 days
- Basis of termination
- Voluntary dismissal
- Products & marks
- XProtect software · XProtect software in combination with XProtect video analytics extensions from third-party partners · XProtect software in combination with any of the foregoing as installed on the Milestone Husky VMS hardware appliance · XProtect software in combination with the Briefcam Respond video analytics extension
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
Get an FTO claim chart- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
Systems and methods for correlating data from IP sensor networks for security, safety, and business productivity applications
Monitoring systems and methods for use in security, safety, and business process applications utilizing a correlation engine are disclosed. Sensory data from one or more sensors are captured and analyzed to detect one or more events in the sensory data. The events are correlated by a correlation engine, optionally by weighing the events based on attributes of the sensors that were used to detect the primitive events. The events are then monitored for an occurrence of one or more correlations of interest, or one or more critical events of interest. Finally, one or more actions are triggered based on a detection of one or more correlations of interest, one or more anomalous events, or one or more critical events of interest. Events may come from sensory devices, legacy systems, third-party systems, anonymous tips, and other data sources. The present invention may be used to increase business productivity by improving security, safety, and increasing profitability of business processes.
- Legal status
- Active
- Granted
- 11 Apr 2017
- Earliest priority
- 4 Oct 2007
- Est. expiry
- 4 Oct 2027
- Validity challenges
- None recorded
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- DONOVAN, JOHN J · HUSSAIN, DANIAR
- Classification
- G08B21/00G08B13/196G06F3/0481H04N7/18H04L29/08H04N5/232H04N5/247H04L12/24G06F3/06H04N23/90
- Prosecution counsel
- American Patent Agency PC
- Examiner
- LA, ANH V
Systems and methods for correlating sensory events and legacy system events utilizing a correlation engine for security, safety, and business productivity
Monitoring systems and methods for use in security, safety, and business process applications utilizing a correlation engine are disclosed. Sensory data from one or more sensors are captured and analyzed to detect one or more events in the sensory data. The events are correlated by a correlation engine, optionally by weighing the events based on attributes of the sensors that were used to detect the primitive events. The events are then monitored for an occurrence of one or more correlations of interest, or one or more critical events of interest. Finally, one or more actions are triggered based on a detection of one or more correlations of interest, one or more anomalous events, or one or more critical events of interest. Events may come from sensory devices, legacy systems, third-party systems, anonymous tips, and other data sources. The present invention may be used to increase business productivity by improving security, safety, and increasing profitability of business processes.
- Legal status
- Active
- Granted
- 10 Mar 2020
- Earliest priority
- 4 Oct 2007
- Est. expiry
- 4 Oct 2027
- Validity challenges
- None recorded
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- DONOVAN, JOHN J · HUSSAIN, DANIAR
- Classification
- G08B21/00H04L12/24G08B13/196H04N7/18H04N5/77H04W4/70H04L29/08H04L29/06H04L12/26
- Prosecution counsel
- American Patent Agency PC
- Examiner
- LA, ANH V
Also asserted in this case
7 moreThe docket lists 9 asserted patents. Full bibliographic detail, drawings and prosecution history for the remaining 7 asserted patents are one query away in Eureka.
- US11929870B2Correlation engine for correlating sensory events
- US10862744B2Correlation system for correlating sensory events and legacy system events
- US10020987B2Systems and methods for correlating sensory events and legacy system events utilizing a correlation engine for security, safety, and business productivity
- US9344616B2Correlation engine for security, safety, and business productivity
- US11323314B2Heirarchical data storage and correlation system for correlating and storing sensory events in a security and safety system
- US8354926B2Systems and methods for business process monitoring
- US8130098B2Systems and methods for safety and business productivity
Parties of record
Securenet Solutions Group, LLC
- Core tech
- G08B21/00G08B13/196G06F3/0481H04N7/18
- Counsel
- Albert Bianchi Jr · Benjamin Woodruff · Jennifer E. Schlatter · Jon Trembath · Vandana Koelsch
- Firm
- Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Milestone Systems
- Core tech
- Not recorded
- Counsel
- Eric T. Harmon · Jason M. Dorsky · Michael P. Sandonato · Nathan C. Brunette · Per A. Ramfjord
- Firm
- Stoel Rives LLP, Venable LLP
Counsel of record
| Attorney | For | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Albert Bianchi Jr | Securenet Solutions Group, LLC | Plaintiff |
| Benjamin Woodruff | Securenet Solutions Group, LLC | Plaintiff |
| Jennifer E. Schlatter | Securenet Solutions Group, LLC | Plaintiff |
| Jon Trembath | Securenet Solutions Group, LLC | Plaintiff |
| Vandana Koelsch | Securenet Solutions Group, LLC | Plaintiff |
| Eric T. Harmon | Milestone Systems | Defendant |
| Jason M. Dorsky | Milestone Systems | Defendant |
| Michael P. Sandonato | Milestone Systems | Defendant |
| Nathan C. Brunette | Milestone Systems | Defendant |
| Per A. Ramfjord | Milestone Systems | Defendant |
Basis of termination
From the record · verbatim“Plaintiff SecureNet Solutions Group, LLC by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files this notice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A) to notify the Court and Defendant that this action is dismissed without prejudice. Because Defendant has neither filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment, this dismissal is self-effectuating.”
Case 3:25-cv-01232 · D. Or. · closed 6 May 2026
Related cases
Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.
Frequently asked questions
What is case 3:25-cv-01232?
3:25-cv-01232 is a patent infringement action brought by Securenet Solutions Group, LLC against Milestone Systems, filed on 14 Jul 2025 in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. The case closed on 6 May 2026.
Which patents were asserted in 3:25-cv-01232?
US9619984B2 (“Systems and methods for correlating data from IP sensor networks for security, safety, and business productivity applications”), assigned to SECURENET SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC, currently active; US10587460B2 (“Systems and methods for correlating sensory events and legacy system events utilizing a correlation engine for security, safety, and business productivity”), assigned to SECURENET SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC, currently active; US11929870B2 (“Correlation engine for correlating sensory events”), assigned to SECURENET SOLUTIONS GROUP LLC; US10862744B2 (“Correlation system for correlating sensory events and legacy system events”), assigned to SECURENET SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC; US10020987B2 (“Systems and methods for correlating sensory events and legacy system events utilizing a correlation engine for security, safety, and business productivity”), assigned to SECURENET SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC; US9344616B2 (“Correlation engine for security, safety, and business productivity”), assigned to SECURENET SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC; US11323314B2 (“Heirarchical data storage and correlation system for correlating and storing sensory events in a security and safety system”), assigned to SECURENET SOLUTIONS GROUP LLC; US8354926B2 (“Systems and methods for business process monitoring”), assigned to SECURENET SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC; US8130098B2 (“Systems and methods for safety and business productivity”), assigned to SECURENET SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC. The record also lists XProtect software, XProtect software in combination with XProtect video analytics extensions from third-party partners, XProtect software in combination with any of the foregoing as installed on the Milestone Husky VMS hardware appliance and XProtect software in combination with the Briefcam Respond video analytics extension.
How was case 3:25-cv-01232 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is voluntary dismissal. The termination text reads: “Plaintiff SecureNet Solutions Group, LLC by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files this notice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A) to notify the Court and Defendant that this action is dismissed without prejudice. Because Defendant has neither filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment, this dismissal is self-effectuating.”
What does dismissal without prejudice mean?
A dismissal without prejudice ends this action but leaves the claims alive — the plaintiff may file them again later, subject to the limitation period.
How long did case 3:25-cv-01232 take?
296 calendar days, from filing on 14 Jul 2025 to closure on 6 May 2026.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 3:25-cv-01232?
Chief Judge Amy E. Potter presided. Albert Bianchi Jr, Benjamin Woodruff, Jennifer E. Schlatter, Jon Trembath and Vandana Koelsch are recorded as counsel for plaintiff Securenet Solutions Group. Eric T. Harmon, Jason M. Dorsky, Michael P. Sandonato, Nathan C. Brunette and Per A. Ramfjord appear for defendant Milestone Systems.
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 3:25-cv-01232 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.