Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
Sequoia Technology v. Hewlett-Parkard | Patent Lawsuit 21-2264

Sequoia Technology, LLC v. Hewlett-Parkard, Co.

21-2264 Fed. Cir. Closed US6718436B2
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 30 Aug 2021 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and closed 12 Apr 2023, with US6718436B2 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: appeal dismissed in part.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Patent involved
US6718436B2
Application no.
US10/005604
Case no.
21-2264
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
Fed. Cir.
Court level
Court of Appeals
Case region
District of Columbia
Chief judge
None recorded
Trial level
Appeal
Filed – Closed
30 Aug 2021 – 12 Apr 2023
Duration
590 days
Basis of termination
Appeal Dismissed in Part
Products & marks
Method for managing logical volume in order to support dynamic online resizing and software raid and to minimize metadata and computer readable medium storing the same
Validity challenges
1 on record
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 21-2264, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US6718436B2 Inactive App. US10/005604

Method for managing logical volume in order to support dynamic online resizing and software raid and to minimize metadata and computer readable medium storing the same

A method for managing a logical volume for minimizing a size of metadata and supporting dynamic online resizing and software redundant array of independent disks (RAID), and a computer-readable recording medium storing instructions for embodying the method, are disclosed. The method includes the metadata having a disk partition table containing information of a disk partition in which the metadata is stored; a logical volume table for maintaining the information of the logical volume by storing duplicated information of the logical volume onto all disk partitions of the logical volume; an extent allocation table for indicating whether each extent in the disk partitions is used or not; and a mapping table for maintaining a mapping information for a physical address space corresponding to a logical address space which is a continuous address space equal in size of storage space of whole logical volume.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Inactive
Granted
6 Apr 2004
Earliest priority
27 Jul 2001
Est. expiry
5 May 2022
Validity challenges
1 on recordIPR2019-00465 · Other · filed by Red Hat, Inc.
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
G06F12/02G06F12/00G06F13/00G06F3/06
Prosecution counsel
JACOBSON HOLMAN, PLLC.
Examiner
GOSSAGE, GLENN
Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Counsel of record

Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“THIS CAUSE having been considered, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: REVERSED-IN-PART, AFFIRMED-IN-PART”

Case 21-2264 · Fed. Cir. · closed 12 April 2023
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 21-2264?

21-2264 is a patent infringement action brought by Sequoia Technology, LLC against Hewlett-Parkard, Co., filed on 30 Aug 2021 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The case closed on 12 April 2023.

Which patent was asserted in 21-2264?

US6718436B2 (“Method for managing logical volume in order to support dynamic online resizing and software raid and to minimize metadata and computer readable medium storing the same”), assigned to ELECTRONICS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, currently inactive. The record also lists Method for managing logical volume in order to support dynamic online resizing and software raid and to minimize metadata and computer readable medium storing the same.

How was case 21-2264 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is appeal dismissed in part. The termination text reads: “THIS CAUSE having been considered, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: REVERSED-IN-PART, AFFIRMED-IN-PART”

How long did case 21-2264 take?

590 calendar days, from filing on 30 Aug 2021 to closure on 12 April 2023.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 21-2264?

Alan J. Heinrich, Andrei Iancu and Philip J. Warrick are recorded as counsel for plaintiff Sequoia Technology. Jack B. Blumenfeld appears for defendant Hewlett-Parkard.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 21-2264 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 21-2264 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.