Infringement action filed 21 Apr 2023 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and closed 15 Dec 2023, with 5 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: dismissed with prejudice.
Disk drive partitioning methods and apparatus · Method and system for extending the functionality of an environmental monitor for an industrial personal computer · Method and system for providing independent server functionality in a single personal computer · System and method for caching web pages on a management appliance for personal computers
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 2:23-cv-00185, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
A system and method for enhancing the functionality of a dual opposing ISA/PCI bus alarm card of an industrial computer where the alarm card includes a microserver for communicating with web-enabled information on the host computer.
A system and method for providing the functionality of independent dedicated servers in a space savings and heat dissipation limited design, including a PC having a plurality of independent dedicated server cards which do not communicate over the PC system bus and only receive power therefrom. Communication with the server cards is done by independent pin connections on the exterior of the PC housing.
The docket lists 5 asserted patents. Full bibliographic detail, drawings and prosecution history for the remaining 3 asserted patents are one query away in Eureka.
Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket.Compare both portfolios
Outcome
Basis of termination
From the record · verbatim
"Before the Court is the Notice of Dismissal filed by Servstor Technologies LLC. (Dkt. No. 22.) In the Notice, Plaintiff represents that the above-captioned member case is voluntarily dismissed WITH PREJUDICE. (Id. at 1.) In light of the Notice, which the Court ACCEPTS AND ACKNOWLEDGES, and pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), all pending claims and causes of action in the abovecaptioned member case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All pending requests for relief in the above-captioned member case not explicitly granted herein are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned member case (2:23- cv-00185) as no parties or claims remain, but leave the Lead Case open."
Case 2:23-cv-00185 · E.D. Tex. · closed 15 December 2023
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.
Related cases
Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.
2:23-cv-00185 is a patent infringement action brought by ServStor Technologies, LLC against MiTAC Computing Technology Corporation, filed on 21 Apr 2023 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The case closed on 15 December 2023.
Which patents were asserted in 2:23-cv-00185?
US7310750B1 (“Method and system for extending the functionality of an environmental monitor for an industrial personal computer”), assigned to SERVSTOR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, currently inactive; US7191274B1 (“Method and system for providing independent server functionality in a single personal computer”), assigned to SERVSTOR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, currently inactive; US6738930B1 (“Method and system for extending the functionality of an environmental monitor for an industrial personal computer”), assigned to SERVSTOR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; US7870271B2 (“Disk drive partitioning methods and apparatuses”), assigned to SERVSTOR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; US7000010B1 (“System and method for caching web pages on a management appliance for personal computers”), assigned to SERVSTOR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. The record also lists Disk drive partitioning methods and apparatus, Method and system for extending the functionality of an environmental monitor for an industrial personal computer, Method and system for providing independent server functionality in a single personal computer and System and method for caching web pages on a management appliance for personal computers.
How was case 2:23-cv-00185 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is dismissed with prejudice. The termination text reads: "Before the Court is the Notice of Dismissal filed by Servstor Technologies LLC. (Dkt. No. 22.) In the Notice, Plaintiff represents that the above-captioned member case is voluntarily dismissed WITH PREJUDICE. (Id. at 1.) In light of the Notice, which the Court ACCEPTS AND ACKNOWLEDGES, and pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), all pending claims and causes of action in the abovecaptioned member case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All pending requests for relief in the above-captioned member case not explicitly granted herein are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-capt
What does dismissal with prejudice mean?
A dismissal with prejudice permanently ends the claims that were filed, so the same claims cannot be brought again against that defendant. It is the usual form when the parties have settled.
How long did case 2:23-cv-00185 take?
238 calendar days, from filing on 21 Apr 2023 to closure on 15 December 2023.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 2:23-cv-00185?
John Andrew Rubino, Justin Kurt Truelove, Michael Mondelli III and Vincent J. Rubino III are recorded as counsel for plaintiff ServStor Technologies.
Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 2:23-cv-00185 and do not constitute legal advice.Ask your own question
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 2:23-cv-00185 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.
