Streamscale, Inc. v. Cloudera, Inc. et al.

6:21-cv-00198 is a patent infringement action brought by Streamscale, Inc. against Cloudera, Inc., filed on 2 Mar 2021 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. The case closed on 1 November 2023.

US10003358B2 (“Accelerated erasure coding system and method”), assigned to STREAMSCALE, INC., currently active; US8683296B2 (“Accelerated erasure coding system and method”), assigned to STREAMSCALE, INC., currently active; US10291259B2 (“Accelerated erasure coding system and method”), assigned to STREAMSCALE, INC.; US10666296B2 (“Accelerated erasure coding system and method”), assigned to STREAMSCALE, INC.; US9160374B2 (“Accelerated erasure coding system and method”), assigned to STREAMSCALE, INC.; US9385759B2 (“Accelerated erasure coding system and method”), assigned to STREAMSCALE, INC.. The record also lists A data matrix for holding original data, a check matrix for holding check data, and an encoding matrix for holding first factors, all in memory., A parallel lookup multiplier and a sequencer for ordering operations through the data matrix and encoding matrix to generate the check data., Accelerated erasure coding (“EC”) technology are the “EC Systems.”, Apache Hadoop (“Cloudera CDH”),, Experian Analytical Sandbox and Velcro, and any Experian product or service, ISA-L, Intel, AMD, ARM, and/or PPC64 processing cores 16 data registers of at least 16 bytes each, Intel® 64., Non-volatile storage (memory) and computer instructions to implement accelerated ECC, Player Relationship Management Platform (“PRMP”) in support of Wargaming’s online games and massively multiplayer online (“MMO”) games, and any Wargaming product or service, Systems that incorporate Cloudera Erasure Coding Components, The EC System Defendants through the deployment and/or use of Intel’s Intelligent Storage Acceleration Library (“ISA-L”)., erasure code products and services and systems capable of performing accelerated ECC.

The recorded basis of termination is judgment on the merits for plaintiff. The termination text reads: "A jury trial commenced with jury selection on October 5, 2023, and on October 13, 2023 the jury reached and returned its unanimous verdict finding that Defendant Cloudera, Inc. (“Cloudera”) directly infringed Claims 34 and 35 of U.S. Patent No. 8,683,296 (“the ’296 Patent”); Claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 9,385,759 (“the ’759 Patent”); and Claim 12 of U.S. Patent No. 10,291,259 (“the ’259 Patent”) (together, the “Asserted Claims”), finding that none of the Asserted Claims were proven invalid, and awarding damages of $240,000,000. (ECF No. 340.) The Court has resolved all pending issues between th

A dismissal without prejudice ends this action but leaves the claims alive — the plaintiff may file them again later, subject to the limitation period.

974 calendar days, from filing on 2 Mar 2021 to closure on 1 November 2023.

Chief Judge Alan D Albright presided. Austin Teng, David W Higer, H. Grant Tucker, Jamie H. McDole, Jason G. Sheasby, Lisa Glasser, Massimo Ciccarelli, Matthew K. Joeckel, Michael D. Karson, Nadia Elena Haghighatian, Phillip B. Philbin, Sarah Shawn Williamson and Stephen M. Payne are recorded as counsel for plaintiff Streamscale. Audrey Lo, Benjamin L. Bernell, Brock S. Weber, Christopher Kao, Christopher Lee Drymalla, Darryl Adams, Jeffrey E. Faucette, John J. Steger, Steven P. Tepera and Surui Ou appear for defendant Cloudera.