TBA Tecnologia em Equipamentos Ltda v. DRV Bombas Ltda

2166572-09.2023.8.26.0000 Court of Justice of Sao Paulo Closed BRMU8900667Y1
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed in the Court of Justice of Sao Paulo and closed 31 Oct 2023, with BRMU8900667Y1 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: appeal allowed.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Patent involved
BRMU8900667Y1
Application no.
BRMU8900667
Case no.
2166572-09.2023.8.26.0000
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
Court of Justice of Sao Paulo
Court level
District Court
Case region
None recorded
Chief judge
None recorded
Trial level
Other
Filed – Closed
None recorded
Duration
None recorded
Basis of termination
Appeal Allowed
Products & marks
arrangement applied in rotating cylindrical adjustable sprayer
Validity challenges
None recorded
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 2166572-09.2023.8.26.0000, Court of Justice of Sao Paulo. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
BRMU8900667Y1 Inactive App. BRMU8900667

DISPOSIÇÃO APLICADA EM ASPERSOR CILÍNDRICO GIRATÓRIO AJUSTÁVEL

DISPOSIÇÃO APLICADA EM ASPERSOR CILÍNDRICO GIRATÓRIO AJUSTÁVEL, composto por uma conexão (1) de entrada de água, um corpo (2) intermediário, roscado (R) em colarinho (3) guia pelo movimento radial (a 1) viabiliza o giro e direcionamento do fluxo d'água, sendo que metade do perímetro do referido corpo (2) conforma um rebaixo (2R) em cuja borda (2P) mais projetante é assentado um anel (4) móvel deslizante igualmente com meia seção rebaixada (4R) que pelo giro promove o ajuste vertical (a2) e horizontal (a3) do rasgo (5) gerado pela interseção entre o rebaixo (2R) e o anteparo (4A) do anel (4).

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Inactive
Granted
14 Feb 2017
Est. expiry
23 Mar 2024
Validity challenges
None recorded
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
B05B3/04
Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Counsel of record

AttorneyForRole
Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

"I uphold the appeal. They are considered to be pre-questioned everyone Devices Constitutional & Legal Treated implicit expressly, at trial.The parties are hereby informed that, in If motions for clarification are filed against the judgment, its judgment is It will take place in a virtual environment."

Case 2166572-09.2023.8.26.0000 · Court of Justice of Sao Paulo · closed 31 October 2023
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 2166572-09.2023.8.26.0000?

2166572-09.2023.8.26.0000 is a patent infringement action brought by TBA Tecnologia em Equipamentos Ltda against DRV Bombas Ltda in the Court of Justice of Sao Paulo. The case closed on 31 October 2023.

Which patent was asserted in 2166572-09.2023.8.26.0000?

BRMU8900667Y1 (“DISPOSIÇÃO APLICADA EM ASPERSOR CILÍNDRICO GIRATÓRIO AJUSTÁVEL”), assigned to TBA - TECNOLOGIA EM EQUIPAMENTOS LTDA, currently inactive. The record also lists arrangement applied in rotating cylindrical adjustable sprayer.

How was case 2166572-09.2023.8.26.0000 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is appeal allowed. The termination text reads: "I uphold the appeal. They are considered to be pre-questioned everyone Devices Constitutional & Legal Treated implicit expressly, at trial.The parties are hereby informed that, in If motions for clarification are filed against the judgment, its judgment is It will take place in a virtual environment."

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 2166572-09.2023.8.26.0000 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 2166572-09.2023.8.26.0000 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.